• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Shouldn't region-free gaming be a standard next gen?

OuterWorldVoice said:
The difference is that gouging is taking advantage of an unusual circumstance to make a profit that directly hurts the customer. We're talking about companies trying not to lose money on foreign distribution, that's a massive difference, not a semantic one.

You haven't given a reason why this control is actually necessary to "not lose money on foreign distribution" given that three of the current five systems do without it, though.
 
OuterWorldVoice said:
The difference is that gouging is taking advantage of an unusual circumstance to make a profit that directly hurts the customer. We're talking about companies trying not to lose money on foreign distribution, that's a massive difference, not a semantic one.

And in 15 years of gaming you've never read an english manual? Or played a localized version of the game?
Your argument doesn't hold up to a logical assesment. If there is a large enough local market to support a game's local release, then it will be there regardless of whether or not region locking is in place. If there is no such market, then region locking will only reduce the total amount of sales for a game. Also, translation is a completely different matter: if someone wants a translated version of the game he won't import anyway.

Region locking benefits no one except maybe local subsidiaries of publishers. It does not benefit developers and it does not benefit customers.

charlequin said:
You haven't given a reason why this control is actually necessary to "not lose money on foreign distribution" given that three of the current five systems do without it, though.
3 1/2 actually. Or rather, 4 1/2 out of 6.
 
sprocket said:
not every PS3 game is region free. same as the 360. and no movie is region free those all about merchandising.

That would be a good point if it wasn't incorrect.
All PS3 games are region free.

Most blu-ray movies are.
 
I totally don't get why the DS is region-free but the Wii isn't.


Thank fucking god for homebrew and GeckoOS.
 
H_Prestige said:
ps1, ps2 games, DVDs, and some blu ray movies have region locks that the ps3 doesn't bypass.
Those are all extra features and with the exception of Blu-ray, not even "this gen".
Besides, 90% of Blu-ray movies are region-free as well.

sprocket said:
not every PS3 game is region free.
Name one.
 
charlequin said:
You haven't given a reason why this control is actually necessary to "not lose money on foreign distribution" given that three of the current five systems do without it, though.

OK, here's a scenario.

SCEA is set up as a standalone business unit. It has not decided whether it will release Super Jumping Flash in the US yet. Meanwhile, demand for import is huge. So it sells a lot to hardcore import gamers.

Now SCEI doesn't make any more or less money on these transactions, but SCEA loses the cream off the top of a future release. It also loses control of marketing and messaging for the product.

Also, Super Jumping Flash is LOUSY with nudity AND swearing in the Japanese version, and the ESRB slaps Sony with a fine for not doing a better job of protecting the children.

I'm not saying any of this is a big deal, I'm just saying it's one of the primary reasons companies still do region locking.

There are two takeways from this scenario:

1. It's an old artifice, that while annoying, has practical non-evil benefits for the local subsidiary.
2. Super Jumping Flash is GOTY 2009.
 
Haunted said:
I totally don't get why the DS is region-free but the Wii isn't.

Let's just clear up one thing: it's the publishers who want region locks, not the console makers. If anything, region locks are another hassle when making a console. Nintendo could do a region free DS because they pretty much owned the handheld market. But it's pretty clear they didn't want any reasons to scare off potential publishers with their new unproven console, especially coming after one of their worst performing (sales-wise) consoles ever.

I do hope, and actually expect, that all next-gen consoles will be region free. There's, after all, no reason for them to not be region free.
 
TOTALLY YES

i'd die if there will be a new .hack game or a new xeno on the xbox360 and they will not arrive in Europe >_>
just to clear, i have nothing against that console, it's just the one with region lock (wii has freeloader) >_>
 
Brakara said:
Let's just clear up one thing: it's the publishers who want region locks, not the console makers. If anything, region locks are another hassle when making a console. Nintendo could do a region free DS because they pretty much owned the handheld market. But it's pretty clear they didn't want any reasons to scare off potential publishers with their new unproven console, especially coming after one of their worst performing (sales-wise) consoles ever.
That's certainly an interesting point.
 
cjelly said:
Isn't the Wii the only region-locked console out?
Come on, ask me why I haven't played Tales of Vesperia yet.

(In fact, I find the 360 even more annoying, since with the Wii and earlier consoles it was/is atleast possible to circumvent the region locking mechanism)
 
stilgar said:
nintendo_logo.jpg


"no"

Nintendo only region locks their home consoles. Even the original brick GameBoy unit was region free along with the Gameboy Advance, the Virtual Boy, and the DS. All systems are region free.

Every Nintendo home console has been region locked but what was funny is that the N64 was region locked due to plastic. It was little nubs that just prevented other region carts from being inserted into the machine. If you removed that piece of plastic, you could play just fine.
 
Durante said:
Come on, ask me why I haven't played Tales of Vesperia yet.

(In fact, I find the 360 even more annoying, since with the Wii and earlier consoles it was/is atleast possible to circumvent the region locking mechanism)
The 360 is region-free. Games on it are locked by the publishers on a game-by-game basis.

With ToV, there's a very good reason why it's region locked: Because Namco sell distribution rights in Europe as they don't distribute their own games here.
 
cjelly said:
The 360 is region-free. Games on it are locked by the publishers on a game-by-game basis.
If there are region locked 360 games then 360 is not region free. If some publishers have to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century then so be it. DS, PSP and PS3 show that it can be done.
 
I wonder if Microsoft's stance on region-coding has been softened by Sony's approach. Both Xboxes have left whether or not the game should be region-coded to the publisher, but whereas on the first Xbox it was pretty much only Microsoft and Ubisoft that left it out with any regularity (a list I found listed 45 region-free original Xbox titles), on the 360 it's mostly just EA and obscure Japanese games. Something changed there and I can only assume that Microsoft has started encouraging publishers not to use it.

Whether or not MS will drop it entirely for the next Xbox is 50/50, but Nintendo changing?


...
:lol :lol :lol :lol

Edit: There have been region-locked demos on the PS3, so the provision to do it is obviously there.
 
What's the deal if you buy a PS3 game outside your region and then want to buy DLC for it?

And yeah, complete region freedom is not going to happen.
 
Nintendo used to really do the bare minimum with region lock : physical differences in cartridge shape, resistors on PCB and so on. I don't really think they want a strong region lock. But they definitely don't want publishers to go away with this. 360 way could be a solution, though.

Brakara said:
Let's just clear up one thing: it's the publishers who want region locks, not the console makers.
Actually, I think it may be one of the reasons of the success of 360 among japanese publishers... I was expecting PS3 to be the home for smaller japanese studios, but it turned wrong. And indeed, most japanese 360 games are region-locked.

And it really bothers me :(
 
Fredescu said:
And yeah, complete region freedom is not going to happen.
Many people say this. I really don't see why. The arguably most successful current gaming system (DS) is not region locked. Neither is one of the current consoles and the other handheld. In one console it's optional but rarely (if annoyingly) used. PCs never had a region locking mechanism to begin with.

Why does it seem like such a fact of life to some? Because a few clauses in some distribution agreements would have to change slightly? I really don't see it.
 
Durante said:
Many people say this. I really don't see why. The arguably most successful current gaming system (DS) is not region locked. Neither is one of the current consoles and the other handheld. In one console it's optional but rarely (if annoyingly) used. PCs never had a region locking mechanism to begin with.

Why does it seem like such a fact of life to some? Because a few clauses in some distribution agreements would have to change slightly? I really don't see it.
Not to pee on your parade, but by using your argument (though reversed), you could bring up the fact that the the best-selling home platforms are region locked (or in the 360's case, mostly region locked), and the two worst-selling home/handheld platforms are region free.

Maybe publishers are jumping ship because they want region locking!

Again, I'm using your argument, lol
 
Fredescu said:
What's the deal if you buy a PS3 game outside your region and then want to buy DLC for it?

And yeah, complete region freedom is not going to happen.
If I'm not mistaken, PS3 game saves and DLC work just like they do on the PSP. Game saves and DLC are stored on folders named after the games serial number. Since each region has its own unique set of serial numbers, each game is tied to the DLC of the same region.

If you have a N.A. console and want to download content for a JP game you have to buy it from the JP store and if you have a Euro console and want to download content for a U.S. game you have to buy it from the U.S. store (etc...).
 
Hooray for next-gen OFLC global censorship.

It's a necessary evil guys. They don't do it just to fuck with you.
 
Michan said:
Maybe publishers are jumping ship because they want region locking!
Publishers are jumping ship away from DS or towards Wii? That's news to me!

Anyway, my argument was not that lack of region locking causes great sales, that's what you interpreted. My argument was and is that plenty of gaming platform do just fine without it, so it is by no means a necessity.
 
With publishers and console suppliers leaning more and more toward digital delivery of games, fighting used sales, controlling individual game content through codes and direct purchase, I'd say you could kiss the dream of region free gaming goodbye along with a lot of other niceties we took for granted the last couple gens.
 
yes

Wii is stupid because I need homebrew or a disk to play the import games I PAY FOR and instead of Nintendo giving a reasonable solution similar to the one that FANS DID IN THEIR SPARE TIME they attempt to constantly block ways of doing this.
 
regioning should be abolished, but now that the Australian dollar sucks the hairiest of balls right now, it's irrelevant.

Earlier in the year though it was brilliant. Got my PS3 games so cheap.
 
Linkzg said:
yes

Wii is stupid because I need homebrew or a disk to play the import games I PAY FOR and instead of Nintendo giving a reasonable solution similar to the one that FANS DID IN THEIR SPARE TIME they attempt to constantly block ways of doing this.
I think the Wii has it pretty nice compared to most systems. You usually have to mod a console or buy something extra, whereas with the Wii, you just need to put some stuff on the SD card.
 
Durante said:
Right, now I remember, that's a huge problem on PC, PSP, DS and PS3. Except... not.

Yeah becuase those users are importing from other uncensored regions. However, it'll only take one bad lawsuit to reverse it. We've already seen such things with Fallout 3. Also, No More Heros benefitted from the region lock in that the US version retains blood.
 
Killthee said:
If I'm not mistaken, PS3 game saves and DLC work just like they do on the PSP. Game saves and DLC are stored on folders named after the games serial number. Since each region has its own unique set of serial numbers, each game is tied to the DLC of the same region.

If you have a N.A. console and want to download content for a JP game you have to buy it from the JP store and if you have a Euro console and want to download content for a U.S. game you have to buy it from the U.S. store (etc...).

Wow, that's retarded. If that's the future of "region free" games, then no thanks (give me the 360 model instead).
 
It will never be a standard - a few advocates of digital distribution will probably be surprised when the platform holders region lock our asses off.
If I lived in the United States I probably wouldn't worry to much but as a European and especially a German gamer I'm pretty afraid of the first generation that only uses digital distribution.
 
Brakara said:
Wow, that's retarded. If that's the future of "region free" games, then no thanks (give me the 360 model instead).
Huh? So being able to import games, but having to deal with a slight hassle when buying DLC for them is somehow worse than not being able to play them at all?
 
Brakara said:
Wow, that's retarded. If that's the future of "region free" games, then no thanks (give me the 360 model instead).

Wouldn't the same situation arise with the region free 360 games and region-specific DLC?
 
If you can buy the game from another region, make sure you can buy DLC from that region, if you want it.

Besides, it's very easy anyway, with prepaid cards in the US and Japan.
Unless you want something from Europe, but with the current exchange rates I don't know why any sane American or Asian person would buy from Europe...
 
KevinCow said:
I think the Wii has it pretty nice compared to most systems. You usually have to mod a console or buy something extra, whereas with the Wii, you just need to put some stuff on the SD card.

Again, Nintendo is trying to get rid of this stuff with (now) stealth firmware updates. PS3, PSP, and DS are the only good solutions since they are 100% region free. 360 is sometimes region free, sometimes not.
 
Brakara said:
Let's just clear up one thing: it's the publishers who want region locks, not the console makers. If anything, region locks are another hassle when making a console. Nintendo could do a region free DS because they pretty much owned the handheld market.
Oh, so that's the same reason why they make DSiWare region locked? Because they own the handheld market, right?
 
Goldrusher said:
Those are all extra features and with the exception of Blu-ray, not even "this gen".
Besides, 90% of Blu-ray movies are region-free as well.

sprocket said:
Originally Posted by sprocket:
not every PS3 game is region free.


Name one.
Still waiting......are you going to name one or not?
 
Linkzg said:
Again, Nintendo is trying to get rid of this stuff with (now) stealth firmware updates. PS3, PSP, and DS are the only good solutions since they are 100% region free. 360 is sometimes region free, sometimes not.

They don't like the fact that Wii's security was broken, the primary concerns are over disc based and downloadable piracy which is what many of their updates are tageting. It's not region circumvention they are trying to kill.

DSi is region-locked for the purpose of parental controls. Nintendo made their portables region-free for a reason, but with DSi they probably don't want to force global ratings as it may be too much of a burden on small publishers and people could possibly file lawsuits over their children playing games that have not been properly rated. People really are this stupid. Physical games need special importing, dowloadable games can be had by anyone which makes the problem harder.
 
I'd never have thought that there would be relatively many people on GAF defending or trying to justify something as patently absurd and anti-customer as region locking. I guess it's another case of "my favourite company does it so it has to be good!".
 
Region locking might be (besides the money hats) one of the reasons why the Japanese publishers actually like the 360 this gen. Square-Enix especially is well known for being extremely against any kind of importing of their RPGs. Heck, they even managed to make sure that us Europeans wouldn't import a worldwide released title like the Last Remnant...
 
H_Prestige said:
Wouldn't the same situation arise with the region free 360 games and region-specific DLC?

Well, I can easily buy European DLC for the US and Asian 360 games I have. I'm just saying I want my region free games to be 100% region free. If not, then I'm not going to bother. Registering a Chinese account with a credit card, and having my DLC tied to that account instead of my main one, is just not going to happen.
 
Durante said:
I'd never have thought that there would be relatively many people on GAF defending or trying to justify something as patently absurd and anti-customer as region locking. I guess it's another case of "my favourite company does it so it has to be good!".

You don't have to look long to realize that this isn't the only anti-consumer issue that GAF doesn't mind. Some (most?) are awesomely in lockstep with any such plan as long as it's endorsed by their sweethearts.
 
Durante said:
Right, now I remember, that's a huge problem on PC, PSP, DS and PS3. Except... not.
It's not a problem on PSP and DS because it's by and large the ultra realistic gore that the OFLC is against. Steam is region locked on the PC, we pretty much can't buy GTA in Australia through Steam. It's illegal to import banned region free games anyway, although I haven't heard any reports of people being busted for it.

As a consumer I hate it, especially living in the country I do. I hate that Activision can price something like CoD4 out of the market in Steam altogether. Software publishers are the driving force of the industry though. If publishers believe they need region protection to be profitable, then it's something that I'd have to begrudgingly accept.

Killthee said:
If you have a N.A. console and want to download content for a JP game you have to buy it from the JP store and if you have a Euro console and want to download content for a U.S. game you have to buy it from the U.S. store (etc...).
So does this mean if you wanted to play DLC on an imported game you couldn't play it under your normal profile? Trophies and that sort of thing don't get credited to your normal account?
 
Top Bottom