bigmakstudios
Banned
"Pi-Ness!"
"D-Ike!"
lawl.
"D-Ike!"
lawl.
Jammy said:I'm surprised they didn't go with a Piplup, Grotle, Infernape combination to try to advertise Pokemon Diamond and Pearl more. I hope they're in as different skins.
Chikorita has already been confirmedShockingAlberto said:Infernape and Turtwig will probably just replace Charizard and Chikorita in the pokeballs.
I'd move Captain Falcon and Ness into Semi-confirmed. F-Zero and Mother items were finally put into the game; it seems just about unthinkable that, after doing that, they'd remove those series' actual characters.Cosmonaut X said:Just to try and get an idea of where we stand with characters, would this be a reasonable summary:
[...]
[SEMI-CONFIRMED]
- Peach (appearance in Subspace Emissary cutscene)
- Meta Knight (appearance in multiple Dojo entries and promo material)
- Solid Snake (appearance in promo material)
[POSSIBLE]
- Captain Falcon (appeared in all previous SSB games)
- Ness (appeared in all previous SSB games)
[...]
Any additions or corrections?
He seems to have reserved the Semi-Confirmed section for characters that have actually made an appearance themselves in some way shape or form - which is wise.Jiggy37 said:I'd move Captain Falcon and Ness into Semi-confirmed. F-Zero and Mother items were finally put into the game; it seems just about unthinkable that, after doing that, they'd remove those series' actual characters.
Not trying to be mean (I'm still biting my nails over Ganon)
Huh?bigmakstudios said:are you fucking joking? he's the fucking antagonist of the zelda series. fuck. >_>
No, there has never been a past stage from a game that didn't have a character to match. Some people take that as an indication that there WILL be an AC character...but most of the good ones seem to be taken up by the stage itself. The only plausible AC character left is a generic AC protagonist.Ravidrath said:In the past, have there been levels that haven't had associated playable characters? I can't think of any, but it's been a while.
That just makes me think we will have a playable AC character or something like that, in addition to Captain Falcon, etc.
Well, Final Destination isn't attributed to a game series I don't think. I don't think you were looking for that kind of answer though.Ravidrath said:In the past, have there been levels that haven't had associated playable characters? I can't think of any, but it's been a while.
He means his inclusion is almost guaranteed.Zeed said:Huh?
Bingo, but what he meant was if there was ever a stage that was attributed to a game that did not have a character to match.ggnoobIGN said:Well, Final Destination isn't attributed to a game series I don't think.=
That's attributed to Smash Bros.ggnoobIGN said:Well, Final Destination isn't attributed to a game series I don't think. I don't think you were looking for that kind of answer though.
Testicular Sound Express said:ganondorf was already confirmed by Aonuma.
He's actually the announcer.Nexus Zero said:Do we know he's not just an assist trophy?
Did Gaf lose common sense?Nexus Zero said:Do we know he's not just an assist trophy?
AniHawk said:He's actually the announcer.
He isn't going to be an assist trophy. How can he go from playable character to assist? I think he's going to be playable but have his own moveset.Nexus Zero said:Do we know he's not just an assist trophy?
Only if you're winning. If you're losing, it's Navi.AniHawk said:He's actually the announcer.
Zeed said:No, there has never been a past stage from a game that didn't have a character to match. Some people take that as an indication that there WILL be an AC character...but most of the good ones seem to be taken up by the stage itself. The only plausible AC character left is a generic AC protagonist.
It's quite possible that the moveset could live on but in the form of a new, more relevant character.Firestorm said:But the other thing is that the old characters are much easier to implement as they already have movesets made for them.
pray for a Pikmin stageant1532 said:I swear. If they put someone in AC in over Olimar.
Olimar better be in the game.
This makes me think we're going to be in the neighborhood of 45 characters. Blind speculation on my part though.Keru_Shiri said:I was totally not expecting another new character announcement this early after Ike. But you won't hear me complaining!
ant1532 said:I swear. If they put someone in AC in over Olimar.
Olimar better be in the game.
This makes me think we're going to be in the neighborhood of 45 characters. Blind speculation on my part though.
ant1532 said:I swear. If they put someone in AC in over Olimar.
Olimar better be in the game.
ant1532 said:I swear. If they put someone in AC in over Olimar.
Olimar better be in the game.
theres still the geneic Boy or GirlDeceitDecide said:But... but... aren't AC characters already ruled out? What'll happen if you use an AC character on the AC stage? Have Nook running around in the foreground and background on the same level??? o_0
DeceitDecide said:But... but... aren't AC characters already ruled out? What'll happen if you use an AC character on the AC stage? Have Nook running around in the foreground and background on the same level??? o_0
DeceitDecide said:But... but... aren't AC characters already ruled out? What'll happen if you use an AC character on the AC stage? Have Nook running around in the foreground and background on the same level??? o_0
Or they could just, well, have two Nooks. It's not like the world explodes when all four players pick Mario, or something.Cosmonaut X said:The only AC characters apparently ruled out are the ones who appear in the background of the AC level (so, Brewster, Nook, KK etc.) but even then I believe that someone pointed out that playable characters have appeared in the background of stages previously (can't remember the example given) and there's no reason why Nook couldn't just disappear from the AC background if he was chosen as a playable character on that stage.
I don't believe this is true. Can someone cite this example? I'm running the stages through my head and can't think of anything.Cosmonaut X said:playable characters have appeared in the background of stages previously (can't remember the example given)
Zeed said:I don't believe this is true. Can someone cite this example? I'm running the stages through my head and can't think of anything.
Actually, the most distinctive characteristic of his outfit in the two FE games he's in is his lack of pants.WastingPenguins said:IMO, Marth's outfit would have to see some definite changes if they keep him around. They just look too similar. My problem is that I don't play Fire Emblem, so I have a question-- COULD they change Marth's costume and maintain his character? Does he ever wear different clothes in the FE games?
Or is his outfit an integral part of his character, like Mario's overalls and hat or Link's green tunic, etc.? I'm guessing it is, but I'm still curious.
Resetti is not shown in the background.DeceitDecide said:But... but... aren't AC characters already ruled out? What'll happen if you use an AC character on the AC stage? Have Nook running around in the foreground and background on the same level??? o_0
That really doesn't mean anything. We're looking at Arwings, not characters - one of them could be piloted by James McCloud for all we know.justchris said:On the Great Fox, even if both Falco & Fox are being played, there are points with 3 Arwings in the background. And this is before Krystal existed.
MrCheez said:The background characters on the stage change for every match. It could easily be possible that if someone picked Tom Nook as a fighter (for example), the Tom Nook in the background would not show up for that match.
Don't listen to him!mclem said:Or they could just, well, have two Nooks. It's not like the world explodes when all four players pick Mario, or something.
It's true.jwj442 said:Actually, the most distinctive characteristic of his outfit in the two FE games he's in is his lack of pants.
Interesting bulge there.Slavik81 said:It's true.
![]()
Sans the photoshop, is that official art?Slavik81 said:It's true.
![]()