Baron Aloha
A Shining Example
Most of the Wii games were probably done on Gamecube kits.
Mrbob said:but Nintendo definitely did not make a strong case and WOW people with the Wii.
oh umm...in that case....let's see.....umm...hold on...I know there was something else....Saoh said:i just got home, can anyone tell what MS did?
´cuz i dont loose my pants for HALO3
fortified_concept said:Not to mention this E3 prooved the power difference between PS3 and 360. Price killed everything Sony did good in E3.
Wollan said:I like how Microsofts big announcement was that they wouldn't get GTA4 later than the PS3.
ronito said:oh umm...in that case....let's see.....umm...hold on...I know there was something else....
Saoh said:i just got home, can anyone tell what MS did?
´cuz i dont loose my pants for HALO3
MrSardonic said:As much as I hate to agree with you, I do this time. Nintendo didn't wow me with wii, most games would have looked ugly at the GC E3 conference, and some of the new IPs were in fact pretty gimmicky imo. I didn't see anything that made me think "shit! wow, I've never seen that kind of game before, the wiimote is fantastic, this is going to own traditional gaming".
Only thing they said Nintendo underwhelmed with was the graphics, rest was all positive.GashPrex said:So Sony underwhelmington, Nintendo underwhelmington, but MS delivers? - pretty much what the gamespot blog says
Chiggs said:Ahahahahahahahahaha
What?!
GashPrex said:So Sony underwhelmington, Nintendo underwhelmington, but MS delivers? - pretty much what the gamespot blog says
My Arms Your Hearse said:You disagree? It was pretty blatant.
FFXIII, Lair, and MSG4 are clearly superior graphically to anything realtime that MS showed, and Lair is supposed to be a launch game, no?
Heavenly Sword was on par or better as well, and was demonstrably playable.
My Arms Your Hearse said:You disagree? It was pretty blatant.
FFXIII
LegendofJoe said:That's because you have to play the Wii to get it. Playing is believing according to Nintendo, now don't you think that might be why they have 27 playable games on the show floor?
Chiggs said:A couple of questions:
1. How much of Final Fantasy XIII was actually realtime? I've seen this issue debated and discussed without any real conclusion.
2. Are you impressed by realtime cutscenes, or do you care about how the game actually looks when real code is being processed?
Edit for a couple of thoughts: Warhawk looks like shit. The Naughty Dog game looks cool, but not out of the 360's league, and MGS4 looks spectacular--I have no criticisms of that. Lair...well, not my sort of thing.
Mrbob said:Wait, so Peter Moore pimped the fact X360 is getting GTA4 the same day as PS3? I suppose this is a coupe of sorts, but that is funny. :lol
Well according to Kuturagi PS3 is also too cheap at the moment. Don't fall for the PR hype machine.![]()
basically it's like this... if you weren't already a fan of nintendo style games, there was nothing to be "whelmed" about. if you are a nintendo fan, then yeah, they made more of those types of games for you, so you're happy.BrandNew said:I really don't know how people can be underwhelmed by the Nintendo conference.
I agree but according to my biased side, I would give Nintendo the nod.Suerte said:Microsoft (only slightly) > Nintendo >>>> Sony.
Final verdict.
ding ding ding!!Saoh said:oh, bots overhyping
again. sorry but no![]()