staticneuron said:
Your math is a bit off. The 360 is larger than PS3's install base in the US (28 million vs 17 million) and japan cannot make up for that (around 7 million), so obviously the PS3 has to be doing better worldwide to narrow the gap so much. Puts PAL at 22 million and EMEAA at 6 mill for PS3. So if NA + Japan can add up to around 30 million for the 360, then the 360 would have to be doing next to nothing in EMEAA areas to be 1:1 for sony in PAL areas given both companies reported shipments.
By 'EMEAA areas' I guess you mean EMEAA minus Europe, as EMEAA is "Europe Mid East Africa Asia"?
Lets check:
Xbox 360; 55M LTD WW - 28M US - 1.5 JP, leaves 25,5 for EMEAA total.
PS3; 52M LTD WW - 17M US - 7M JP and now we know they're 22M in Europe leaving 6M for remaining EMEAA areas.
Let's assume that Xbox 360 is also 6M in remaining EMEAA (highly unlikely, but lets just say to for arguments sake), that'll give Xbox 360 some 19,5M installed base in Europe vs the 22M reported PS3.
And that's the 'worst case' scenario numbers for 360 Europe, assuming equal footing with PS3 in "Mid East Africa Asia".
'Ballpark' in Europe, I'd say that's well within any reasonable interpretation of that phrase, even under the worst case scenario for X360 Europe. But that's just me.
No matter; Europe has now been shown to be the closets fought region this generation between the Xbox and PS-brands.