terrisus
Member
...But they aren't.
But there's no reason they can't be.
Let's create a new size chart, called the "terrisus preference sizes," shortened to "tsizes"
She's a "tsize -4"
...But they aren't.
I'll agree that beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
However, there is no doubt that she is big.
She's not that plus size, she has a thigh gap for goodness sake.
I guess we just have different definitions of what constitutes big. I would not consider her "big" based on that photo. However others are indicating it's been photoshopped so perhaps I've been deceived
Wrong. That's shopped. Let's look at some unshopped pics of her.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Is she attractive? Maybe, to you. Is she overweight? Obviously.
Wrong. That's shopped. Let's look at some unshopped pics of her.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Is she attractive? Maybe, to you. Is she overweight? Obviously. Should that preclude her from being in an ad? Nah.
Jesus Christ, that's a stupid thing to photoshop
Ashley Alexiss.
But you brought it up...So obviously to some people it would be classification of "too big". As if thigh gaps were that important.
I'm a dude and I'm jealous that even though her BMI is probably 30% higher than mine, her stomach is that taut.
"Big" means visible overweight. As in, you can tell by looking at her that she is biologically overweight. It's just a definition. Not a subjective thing.
Thigh gaps can be pretty important to some women, they can go to some pretty crazy extremes to achieve it.
It's really weird that they'd photoshop a plus sized model to have one.
I get that, but the picture in the OP does not appear to be overweight to me. So there must be a degree of subjectivity involved.
Remember when Cosmo got in trouble for calling Robyn Lawley plus-size?
I get that, but the picture in the OP does not appear to be overweight to me. So there must be a degree of subjectivity involved.
To be fair, she's 6'2'', which is about a foot taller than most swimsuit models.
Come on man, she's overweight. Obese, even, by medical standards.
I read in a different article that she's a size 14. That's the average American woman's size. As in, the average girlfriend/wife of a male American Gaffer is size 14.
I read in a different article that she's a size 14. That's the average American woman's size. As in, the average girlfriend/wife of a male American Gaffer is size 14.
As in, you guys calling her "heavy" or "big" are delusional. My wife is skinny with curves in all the right places, and she's a size 8-10, depending on her clothes brand.
We're just too used to seeing skeleton models on the runway and in magazines. I'll take a size 14 over a size 4 any day of the week.
Then, medically, the average girlfriend/wife is fat. I'm sorry. That's not a derision or insult, it's medical truth.
If you're ok with that, more power to you, since that's the trend these days.
Around 14 is the crossover between regular and plus. Most makers will have regular clothes in that size, but they will be designed for body types considerably smaller and might not look right.
You're the idiot if you don't understand what fat is.
This model is beautiful. She's fat.
Just like many of the older models are beautiful, but skinny.
Average is not normal. It's only in America where you get participation trophies for breathing, that this kind of attitude comes up. That chick is beautiful, and fat. It's not normal. It's not even average (referring to distribution and shape), though the fat percentage might be.
I read in a different article that she's a size 14. That's the average American woman's size. As in, the average girlfriend/wife of a male American Gaffer is size 14.
As in, you guys calling her "heavy" or "big" are delusional. My wife is skinny with curves in all the right places, and she's a size 8-10, depending on her clothes brand.
We're just too used to seeing skeleton models on the runway and in magazines. I'll take a size 14 over a size 4 any day of the week.
How is something a "plus" size when it's what the average woman in our country wears? That makes no sense. I know what you're saying is accurate, but it's absurd.
The average American woman is medically overweight.
I read in a different article that she's a size 14. That's the average American woman's size. As in, the average girlfriend/wife of a male American Gaffer is size 14.
As in, you guys calling her "heavy" or "big" are delusional. My wife is skinny with curves in all the right places, and she's a size 8-10, depending on her clothes brand.
We're just too used to seeing skeleton models on the runway and in magazines. I'll take a size 14 over a size 4 any day of the week.
Wrong. That's shopped. Let's look at some unshopped pics of her.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Is she attractive? Maybe, to you. Is she overweight? Obviously. Should that preclude her from being in an ad? Nah.
But since the average is overweight, that doesn't make the average good or necessarily more promotable to the industry.
Yeah she caries a much smaller percentage of her weight in her stomach. It mostly goes to her arms, legs and hips. Lucky girl honestly
She's a big girl but her fat is mostly subcutaneous. That's a good thing, means she's still plenty healthy. Proportions more important than actual weight IMO.
I dunno man. My wife is a size 4 and she has plenty of curves. This girl is definitely thick. Just because Americans are overweight in general doesn't make this model somehow not overweight.I read in a different article that she's a size 14. That's the average American woman's size. As in, the average girlfriend/wife of a male American Gaffer is size 14.
As in, you guys calling her "heavy" or "big" are delusional. My wife is skinny with curves in all the right places, and she's a size 8-10, depending on her clothes brand.
We're just too used to seeing skeleton models on the runway and in magazines. I'll take a size 14 over a size 4 any day of the week.