SolidSnakex said:I wonder if any footage will leak? I know GTTV had one of their reveals spoiled when some site leaked the footage early (which caused Game Trailers to post it on their site before GTTV aired).
LiK said:From the mega thread
Where mah planes?
spats said:
Juan29.zapata said:That would be seriously exasperating for them. There's only 7 hours left until the episode is aired and this would be horrible for them.
But hey, it's gameplay!
detective gaf matched the mole. Dont forget thatparams7 said:IGN leaked dev interview, Gamespot leaked the pics. Starhawk the name is confirmed. They both just trolled GTTV a little.
duffyside said:I hate that publishers still release screenshots. Screenshots as a way to market a game should really be a thing of the past. They should only still exist when fans take a still of some epic or hilarious moment. It's 2011, for fuck's sake. No more 5 screenshots. Instead, do 5 seconds of non-cutscene gameplay.
mrwilt said:I want one of these.
![]()
Smision said:The time it takes to touch up and doctor a photo is way less time than it would take to doctor video
revolverjgw said:There's impressions and then there's ridiculous jumps to conclusions like, to quote one guy, ''looks like I'll never see a true sequel to my beloved Warhawk". I think it's pretty easy to understand why some observers would take issue with a myopic comment like that, based on "information" like this. I'm not crazy about this initial peak at the art style, but it's not time to proclaim that they've ruined it or that "it's nothing like Warhawk".
Hell, nothing in these shots looks like anything that would be out of place in Warhawk, at all... if it was in 1st person and there were XP popups everywhere... then let's get to bitchin'.
params7 said:As long as we can do this in Starhawk I think we'll be on for a good sequel :
![]()
I would never call warhawk bland looking at all.GodofWine said:People in this thread remind me of my 2 yr old daughter...when she sees a cloud (one cloud, could be blue everywhere else), she says "Ohhhhhh...raining" and gets sad...
People in this thread see pics of a game (that looks more graphically pleasing than Warhawk by a mile) and somehow say "Ohhhhh...raining.." and get sad and angry all at once.
Warhawk = fairly bland colors...fairly poor graphics (except the sky)...generic people fighting generic people (yes, there were bald versions of them too...)...but it was bang on perfect in terms of gameplay, balance (weapon pick ups only, no classes), big maps...and flat out fun as hell.
So...if this looks a little better, has more creative people fighting more creative looking people, and retains its core gameplay plus maybe a new little twist...
WINNING.
Cronox said:As long as they fix the input lag that killed my ability to aim in Warhawk I'm interested.
warhawk definitely had an input lag. Albeit smallparams7 said:Get better controllers man/stop confusing Warhawk with KZ2
That would be terrible imo, if your Warhawk gets blown up you should die. I hated taking down a Warhawk only to have the person to jump out with a jetpack and fly away to safety.TheJollyCorner said:please have the ability to parachute out of the Warhawks/Starhawks in this one... please...![]()
Crakatak187 said:Well the hype was massively inflated by years of rumors. I can see why there is disappointments.
Naw that would mess up the balance.TheJollyCorner said:please have the ability to parachute out of the Warhawks/Starhawks in this one... please...![]()
But...Spike is horrible. You will regret this decision.yencid said:im watching spike from now till 1 am.
I AM NOT FUCKING MISSING THIS
yencid said:warhawk definitely had an input lag. Albeit small
i know.... but i dont care... i am not missing this i said.narwhalSTAB said:But...Spike is horrible. You will regret this decision.
Loudninja said:Naw that would mess up the balance.
yencid said:i know.... but i dont care... i am not missing this i said.
You could always wait a few hours after airing when it goes up online.yencid said:i know.... but i dont care... i am not missing this i said.
MuseManMike said:You could always wait a few hours after airing when it goes up online.
^ seriously! the hype sets in when you know the time is close.DoomXploder7 said:there is absolutely no fun in that man.
params7 said:Never noticed it. At least the flight game had none of it. Pick up lightning, and if you could tap L1 10 times in 1 second, you could finish off a full health plane in 1 second.
The ground game maybe when lobbying grenades there might've been some lag.
Yeah but for something like Warhawk I don't think it will work it fun trying to get a way with the boosters when you getting shot up.TheJollyCorner said:maybe for you damn flyboys!
Dunno. I liked having the option in Battlefield 1943. Besides, it was awesome turning around and gunning down the parachutist!
NoTotobeni said:Mechs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fighter aircraft.
It will be so downgrade if Mechs transform into Warhawks, it's like having a Bugatti Veyron transform into a broken pink tricycle.
Gimme flying mechs, it's called Starhawk, so no need to bring the old Warhawk aircrafts ( or ugly Nemesis) here.
Bebpo said:wtf, I thought all everyone ever wanted was Warhawk but arcade space sim like X-wing vs. Tie Fighter/Colony Wars.
Will wait for trailer, but if there is none of that, than most misleading title ever.
Totobeni said:Mechs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fighter aircraft.
It will be so downgrade if Mechs transform into Warhawks, it's like having a Bugatti Veyron transform into a broken pink tricycle.
Gimme flying mechs, it's called Starhawk, so no need to bring the old Warhawk aircrafts ( or ugly Nemesis) here.