Pretty apparent that you are an awful personSlayven said:I wonder if that liver Jobs brought was still under warranty?
spiderman123 said:Alright Apple, it's my time to shine. Make me your new CEO, my monthly pay will be $500,000 please.
Great deal amirite. ?!
Why is a picture of Moraine Lake gracing such a tacky phone? Please stop defiling my mountains.Tobor said:No way, man. I'd be looking forward to the new Android phones.
![]()
No, No. We'd all still be using shitty phones from LG and the like, balking at expensive data plans for smart phones that had such awful browsers and weresuch an awful experience, you'd wonder how it could possibly be worth $40 bucks a month.LCfiner said:wed all be looking forward to the new blackberries
Well his note says he can't work, not that he doesn't want to, so yes, he is probably dying.Synth_floyd said:So is Jobs going to die soon, or did he just have an extreme change of heart about the direction of his life and decided to focus on non-work (i.e. non-Apple) stuff?
I hadn't thought about that. You might be right. Also, what would have happened to Microsoft without the pressure to nuke Windows Mobile and start over?LCfiner said:I know were joking around but I honestly think BB wouldve killed Android in that form.
No one knows.Synth_floyd said:So is Jobs going to die soon, or did he just have an extreme change of heart about the direction of his life and decided to focus on non-work (i.e. non-Apple) stuff?
Synth_floyd said:So is Jobs going to die soon, or did he just have an extreme change of heart about the direction of his life and decided to focus on non-work (i.e. non-Apple) stuff?
So you're saying that tomorrow, AAPL won't be closing significantly far from where it closed today correct? Because it was already priced into the market before the announcement was made.Phoenix said:Sure - its called irrational market theory and has been around in finance for quite some time and illustrates pretty cleanly that the market moves of large drops happen before major news announcements. This is a topic discussed in the MBA real on efficient and irrational markets.
giga said:
LCfiner said:yeah, sure, I remember that a bit. not the specific details of the handover, but the whole lead up and press coverage.
The thing that gets me (and I suppose most people in here) about the Jobs resignation is that it is related directly to his poor health.
when the news broke about his resignation, my first thought was about how sick he must be to have to do this. it makes this a much more somber story.
Korey said:So you're saying that tomorrow, AAPL won't be closing significantly far from where it closed today correct? Because it was already priced into the market before the announcement was made.
Tobor said:I hadn't thought about that. You might be right. Also, what would have happened to Microsoft without the pressure to nuke Windows Mobile and start over?
Raistlin said:Holy shit ... end of a fucking era
No matter how you feel about Apple or Jobs, you can't argue with his influence on the computer and CE industry.
First Bill, now Steve. My childhood weepsHell, their influence is in part what directed my career.
Bboy AJ said:Tim Cook is the best replacement, IMO. I wouldn't sweat Apple losing their vision under his command. I like Jonathan Ive but he's not a spotlight kind of guy. Apple is Apple because of their people.
StuBurns said:Was the iPhone the first phone that had voice mail the way it does?
So to summarize- the influential, big investors already take such things into account and as such there will never be large fluctuations in the market due to such? And additionally, any fluctuations in the market will be quickly reversed? Pretty interesting stuff. Where'd you get your MBA from?Phoenix said:No irrational market theory says that the large volume of investors had already taken into account that Steve Jobs would be leaving the company and Tim Cook would be taking over a LONG time ago - this isn't a huge surprise to them. The price they are willing to pay for the stock is based upon this knowledge so there is no mass panic selling due to this news because it is expected. There are irrational behaviors associated with the transition, but the fundamentals of the company and the stock have not changed. As such the swing will be right where it was before the other major news item - Sprint, something the market is pricing into the stock. Irrational market theory goes into great detail on why things like timing the market, selling immediately on 'bad news' etc. are actually counter to rational efficient moves of the market.
I wrote a long paper on it, specifically with respect to Apple while getting my MBA titled "A Steve Jobs a day keeps competitors away?" about 3 years ago that examined the market moves based on the news of Steve's departure and where the major market players actually came in as bargain hunters some days later and the stock was back where it was supposed to be. If you track all of the Steve Jobs medical leave stock announcements you'll find damn near the same 5% trend by irrational investors and shortly thereafter the stock rebounds - even though Steve is not at the helm and Cook is in charge. There are institutional investors who are more stable who have more sense and panic selling day traders who generally make dumb ass moves like this one.
scoobs said:when the iphone5 comes out, nobodys gonna care... everyone will buy it and apple will continue to swim in money
Plasmid said:he's staying on as chairman, neat.
Is this due to his illness(es)?
but Apple's erratic stock performance on Wednesday - hell, even the last 5 days - closely follows that of the major indices - http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=NASDAQ:AAPLPhoenix said:Sure - its called irrational market theory and has been around in finance for quite some time and illustrates pretty cleanly that the market moves of large drops happen before major news announcements. This is a topic discussed in the MBA real on efficient and irrational markets.
foodtaster said:So to summarize- the influential, big investors already take such things into account and as such there will never be large fluctuations in the market due to such? And additionally, any fluctuations in the market will be quickly reversed? Pretty interesting stuff. Where'd you get your MBA from?
789shadow said:Remember how much Apple's stock plummeted after the rumor that Jobs had died got started?
Yeah. This'll be 10 times worse.
scorcho said:but Apple's erratic stock performance on Wednesday - hell, even the last 5 days - closely follows that of the major indices - http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&q=NASDAQ:AAPL
Wikipedia said:By definition, the market itself has a beta of 1.0, and individual stocks are ranked according to how much they deviate from the macro market (for simplicity purposes, the S&P 500 is sometimes used as a proxy for the market as a whole). A stock whose returns vary more than the market's returns over time can have a beta whose absolute value is greater than 1.0 (whether it is, in fact, greater than 1.0 will depend on the correlation of the stock's returns and the market's returns). A stock whose returns vary less than the market's returns has a beta with an absolute value less than 1.0.
So what's your timeline for the reversion after all the panic selling?Phoenix said:In the market - no, that would be an incorrect derivation. In a particular stock - yes. Institutional investors buy and sell based on where they value the stock at some point in the future. It is important to separate fluctuations from a stock from market fluctuations as there is only a correlation between the two based (somewhat loosely) on the stocks beta (which measures how the stock moves with the market).
MBA from Georgia Institute of Technology - go Jackets!
CUPERTINO, CAIn his first major product release since stepping in for an ailing Steve Jobs last month, interim Apple CEO Tim Cook faced a storm of harsh criticism Monday after unveiling a grotesque new version of the company's popular MacBook that many in attendance described as "disgusting."
![]()
Cook presented the bizarre, malformed new product to stunned silence during a media event at Apple headquarters, revealing a device that, while vaguely similar to a computer in certain respects, appeared to be encased in a thick, flesh-like coating that was visibly moist and engorged.
![]()
"Oh, my sweet God," Apple employee Kurt Starfeldt said after viewing the MacBook up close. "It appeared to be discharging some sort of mucus-type substance from the headphone jack and making these weird murmuring sounds. And then it started quivering at one point when Tim was demonstrating how to use the touch pad. It was quite upsetting, actually."
+China Mobile+China TelecomCloudy said:This could be a WONDERFUL buying opportunity with iphone5/Sprint/ipad3 coming soon
Wow, I see. Any (somewhat) easy to read books on this that you'd recommend for someone going for an MBA in the future? What do you do now that you have a MBA? GIT is a good school.Phoenix said:In the market - no, that would be an incorrect derivation. In a particular stock - yes. Institutional investors buy and sell based on where they value the stock at some point in the future. It is important to separate fluctuations from a stock from market fluctuations as there is only a correlation between the two based (somewhat loosely) on the stocks beta (which measures how the stock moves with the market).
MBA from Georgia Institute of Technology - go Jackets!
But didn't you also state that Wednesday's volatility was born on by the anticipation of Jobs' imminent news? That subsequently affected the performance of a majority of other stocks in the exact same manner?Phoenix said:Apple's stock has a beta of (1.08) which means that it fairly closely moves with the market unless there is some event to suggest that it will outperform or underperform the market.
LCfiner said:This Onion article should be reposted.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/interim-apple-chief-under-fire-after-unveiling-gro,19111/
Interim Apple Chief Under Fire After Unveiling Grotesque New MacBook
LCfiner said:This Onion article should be reposted.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/interim-apple-chief-under-fire-after-unveiling-gro,19111/
Interim Apple Chief Under Fire After Unveiling Grotesque New MacBook