Dangansona
Member
Rayman > Banjo-Kazooie
Nice. Ta.Yeah, just a bit under 3 hours.
Rayman > Banjo-Kazooie
Banjo will show up someday...
I'll admit that I expected more characters to come out of the Smash Ballot. Nintendo probably could have done more to align people's expectations. I mean, in the end Corrin looks like he'll be a fun character to play as, but no one asked for him, and when you have a ballot box with character suggestions from vocal fans RIGHT THERE it seems a bit off to go back to a series which is already very over represented in the game.
Yeah dude what the hell is their thought process that they add the most characters from their most popular series. TOTALLY DISGUSTING./s
I don't get the Corrin hate. He's a weredragon pokemon with a chainsaw sword (or she). That's ace!
You enjoy this don't you.I do agree that franchises should only get character slots based on their popularity, which is why I hope Sakurai removes all Metroid characters, Zelda should have fewer characters with every iteration, and all Mario characters should only come from NSMB.
You really don't understand why people would take issue with the most overrepresented franchise in the game getting another character when there are plenty of franchises with great possible characters that are either underrepresented or not represented at all?
I do agree that franchises should only get character slots based on their popularity, which is why I hope Sakurai removes all Metroid characters, Zelda should have fewer characters with every iteration, and all Mario characters should only come from NSMB.
You really don't understand why people would take issue with the most overrepresented franchise in the game getting another character when there are plenty of franchises with great possible characters that are either underrepresented or not represented at all?
You really don't understand why people would take issue with the most overrepresented franchise in the game getting another character when there are plenty of franchises with great possible characters that are either underrepresented or not represented at all?
To me, whoever we get at this point is just gravy. There's never going to be a "perfect" roster as they're never going to satisfy the wish list of everybody. So I get that people are going to want their own picks to get in. But there's 58 characters in this game. Even if you don't count the clones, there's still a very, very healthy amount there. Whatever problems may exist in the game, nitpicking the roster should not be very high on the list.
I don't really care how many characters there are. Adding shitty unnecessary characters is a bad thing no matter what, especially when they literally have a list of the characters people actually want.
I honestly would have preferred no DLC character over a character who was blatantly chosen based on marketing and Sakurai's personal bias.
I'm not trying to stir shit, but how is Simon even remotely on par with Mario or Link? He's not nearly as big as Mega Man, either.
Simon iconic on par with Mario, Link, Mega Man and Pit?
I'm sorry but holy shit lmao.
Just to be clear (not that you were calling me out), I don't have a problem with Corrin. I just wanted to respond to a post that seemed to insinuate that Fire Emblem's representation made sense based on its popularity.
I almost made that same point, but then again, so is Mega Man.
It is good that you said this so I can never take you seriously in these conversations. Thanks!I don't really care how many characters there are. Adding shitty unnecessary characters is a bad thing no matter what, especially when they literally have a list of the characters people actually want.
I honestly would have preferred no DLC character over a character who was blatantly chosen based on marketing and Sakurai's personal bias.
Idol master gameFire Emblem should just get its own Smash spin off game.
...Doesn't it? Fire Emblem Fates is absurdly popular in Japan right now, more so than pretty much any of their IPs barring Splatoon(?)
It's ridiculously hot right now.
Ridiculously hot? Best numbers I can find are that it sold over a half a million in Japan. For the current climate, I can concede that it's a really good number. But the notion that it's the second biggest franchise for Nintendo and almost as big as Mario seems like quite a stretch. I think you need more data than just two 3DS games released over a three year span before elevating it to those levels given that the franchise was on its last legs when Smash 4 was in the conception phase. And in Japan, Fates was outsold by both Splatoon and Animal Crossing.
Mind you, this is kind of a tangent. I don't think that Sakurai has to justify franchise representation based on sales numbers. It's just as much as I am completely on board with the resurgence of the Fire Emblem franchise, I don't think that it's seeing such a meteoric rise that we can now safely call it Nintendo's second biggest franchise just yet.
I don't like another FE being added but I'd rather have an additional character to use (and Corrin is fun!). This is a silly mentality to have. Net plus over a negative or nothing, always.I don't really care how many characters there are. Adding shitty unnecessary characters is a bad thing no matter what, especially when they literally have a list of the characters people actually want.
I honestly would have preferred no DLC character over a character who was blatantly chosen based on marketing and Sakurai's personal bias.
I sincerely doubt Hawlucha was ever even considered for this game. Corrin has nothing to do with Hawlucha's absence.Should have been Hawlucha instead of corn.RIP Hawlucha, you got robbed not once, but twice. First by another fucking pikachu in pokken and then again by corn, a character no one asked for.
I do agree that franchises should only get character slots based on their popularity, which is why I hope Sakurai removes all Metroid characters, Zelda should have fewer characters with every iteration, and all Mario characters should only come from NSMB.
I sincerely doubt Hawlucha was ever even considered for this game. Corrin has nothing to do with Hawlucha's absence.
You really don't understand why people would take issue with the most overrepresented franchise in the game getting another character when there are plenty of franchises with great possible characters that are either underrepresented or not represented at all?
I don't really care how many characters there are. Adding shitty unnecessary characters is a bad thing no matter what, especially when they literally have a list of the characters people actually want.
I honestly would have preferred no DLC character over a character who was blatantly chosen based on marketing and Sakurai's personal bias.
What I don't get is people acting like Corrin was put in the game to spite them.
Personally, I think the obvious choices for characters are mostly covered now. Mii and Wii Fit Trainer cover recent successes. Villager covers a hit franchise that was passed over in an earlier game. Little Mac and Duck Hunt represent classic games that still weigh heavily in public memory. Not to mention Pac-Man and Ryu.
Besides getting characters from other Touch Generations games, it's getting harder and harder to think of new franchises to add that aren't niche. And we did get a bunch of representation for popular niche games as well. Shulk, Robin, Mega Man, etc.
For some perspective, I'm pretty sure that Toad is one of the biggest requests. He was one of the biggest for the initial "who do you want if we make Smash 2" poll, and if you look at the ballot thread for GAF, he was one of the most popular there too. I'd have to double check, but I'm pretty sure he's the biggest request from the earlier games that still hasn't made it in.
Frankly, I'd imagine that we'd be hearing a lot of whining if another Mario character was announced as well. And I think Toad is phenomenally boring choice. Peach already covers Super Mario Bros 2.
At this point, I think we're looking for characters like Jin Saotome from Marvel Vs Capcom; the type of crossover character that wasn't expected or highly requested, but provides something interesting and new to the gameplay that more recognizable characters might not. I really like those sort of characters myself, and that's how I look at Bayonetta and Corrin.
Nintendo still has a few franchises that could use representation with Splatoon, Advance Wars and Rhythm Heaven being the most notable. Third Party wise Koei Tecmo, Hudson, Konami are the big ones left. SNK, Level-5, and Taito are the only other ones I could think of.
Out of those Castlevania representing Konami is really the biggest omission at this point. Putting a Belmont in would pretty much complete Smash and everything else would just be a bonus.
Im pretty curious how dragon quest did in the japanese poll since it would seem like an obvious choice down the road as well.
Excitebike is very notable, and it lends itself to an incredibly offbeat moveset, so I'd be disappointed if it never showed up in Smash Bros. It's one of the more iconic NES games people tend to think of alongside Punch-Out!! and Duck Hunt, and it's received a few sequels over the years.
Ice Climbers were chosen as Melees retro representation. In one of the Smash 2 e-mails, Sakurai discussed how important it is to have a wide selection of characters in order to appeal to the various demographics. When the Ice Climbers got their Japanese Melee character page, Sakurai included other characters that were considered for the Ice Climbers spot. These include Balloon Fighter, Urban Champion, Bubbles (from Clu Clu Land) and Excitebike.
Ridiculously hot? Best numbers I can find are that it sold over a half a million in Japan. For the current climate, I can concede that it's a really good number. But the notion that it's the second biggest franchise for Nintendo and almost as big as Mario seems like quite a stretch. I think you need more data than just two 3DS games released over a three year span before elevating it to those levels given that the franchise was on its last legs when Smash 4 was in the conception phase. And in Japan, Fates was outsold by both Splatoon and Animal Crossing.
Mind you, this is kind of a tangent. I don't think that Sakurai has to justify franchise representation based on sales numbers. It's just as much as I am completely on board with the resurgence of the Fire Emblem franchise, I don't think that it's seeing such a meteoric rise that we can now safely call it Nintendo's second biggest franchise just yet.
I'm just so happy that Bayonetta made it to Smashand K. Rool didn't.
I know, but that was 15 years ago. Ice Climbers and Excitebiker wouldn't be fighting for the same spot anymore. Sakurai has changed his mind plenty of times before, and Bowser Jr. is proof that a "rider" character works in Smash Bros. With that said, I honestly don't think it's going to happen, but there's nothing definitive preventing it.
Excitebike is very notable, and it lends itself to an incredibly offbeat moveset, so I'd be disappointed if it never showed up in Smash Bros. It's one of the more iconic NES games people tend to think of alongside Punch-Out!! and Duck Hunt, and it's received a few sequels over the years.
Dixie's the only character I'm really pulling for now (well, outside of Ridley I guess) but I really do fear she's slipped through the cracks at every available moment and will never get her chance.I think the only legacy character that really is missing Dixie Kong.