I'm no photoshop expert but I whipped this together real quick since I wanted it without the text as well.
EDIT: Fixed some of the minor smudges because they were driving my OCD crazy.
Good work. Thank you.
I'm no photoshop expert but I whipped this together real quick since I wanted it without the text as well.
EDIT: Fixed some of the minor smudges because they were driving my OCD crazy.
A lot of people act like 3D World had fewer moves than Galaxy, which is odd, but it actually had almost every move 3D Mario has ever had and new ones.
I'm no photoshop expert but I whipped this together real quick since I wanted it without the text as well.
EDIT: Fixed some of the minor smudges because they were driving my OCD crazy.
If people ignore 3D World movement options it's because they felt horribly gimped and were mostly useless for advanced, creative gameplay. You simply have to watch speedruns to realize Galaxy still makes use of Mario's core abilities to take cool shortcuts and break the regular level progression while 3D World essentially requires the Peach and cat suit combo to pull off anything. 3D World no powerup runs are the saddest thing to watch.
I'm no photoshop expert but I whipped this together real quick since I wanted it without the text as well.
EDIT: Fixed some of the minor smudges because they were driving my OCD crazy.
3D World copped plenty of flack almost immediately.
You'll have Odyssey, Zelda and Xenoblade for your single player plus ARMS, Splatoon and Mario Kart for multiplayer. Plus many more that'll be announced.Can't afford to throw down on a Switch until next year, but man, am I gonna have a good time when I do or what?
Lightning in the bottle, part 2. This year's output is Nintendo at the top of their game: you'll most likely have a good time.Can't afford to throw down on a Switch until next year, but man, am I gonna have a good time when I do or what?
The first trailer was pretty disappointing.Mostly unjustified though. It is a shame they gimped Mario's movement, but the level design was incredible.
New long gameplay from the final build of the game. Looks beautiful.
https://youtu.be/zIXfgyDMy1E
You can tell the lighting has improved a lot.
Does everyone know that the game is $47.99 for prime members on amazon? I just went to amazon to look for some stuff .. 20% off https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01MY7GHKJ/?tag=neogaf0e-20
Ohh nice I didnt know this.All new games should be 20% off. I use Best Buy Gamers Club and get every brand new game for $48.
New long gameplay from the final build of the game. Looks beautiful.
https://youtu.be/zIXfgyDMy1E
You can tell the lighting has improved a lot.
The HUD looks a little busy for my tastes. Do we know if there are any HUD options like there were with BOTW? I feel like I could do without that compass and the moon counter (I totally skimmed through the video so apologies if this is addressed).
Ohh nice I didnt know this.
Can you also trade in a game and have that go towards whatever new game you are getting a discount on?
Does everyone know that the game is $47.99 for prime members on amazon? I just went to amazon to look for some stuff .. 20% off https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01MY7GHKJ/?tag=neogaf0e-20
For uk customers, the game is 41.99 (39.99 prime) digitally too. Same price as retail.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B071G9VTY1/
New long gameplay from the final build of the game. Looks beautiful.
https://youtu.be/zIXfgyDMy1E
You can tell the lighting has improved a lot.
I'm no photoshop expert but I whipped this together real quick since I wanted it without the text as well.
EDIT: Fixed some of the minor smudges because they were driving my OCD crazy.
Can't afford to throw down on a Switch until next year, but man, am I gonna have a good time when I do or what?
The only one I would look upon with contention. You can see why; it did add a lot of cinematic impact and grandeur to GTA, as well as multiplayer.They gave fucking GTA IV a 10/10? That shit was disappointing coming from San Andreas. It's better than III though.
I was going to make a joke earlier about how skeptical you'd be about this review but I wondered if your tenor had changed since the reveal
How can you claim to be the biggest Mario fan here and not be extremely excited for this game? Doesn't compute.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1431899&page=2
He really swears by Edge scores when it suits his agenda...
the worst thing about oblivion is his fucking iwata avatar
They gave fucking GTA IV a 10/10? That shit was disappointing coming from San Andreas. It's better than III though.
And BOTW to an extent.GTA4 was a rare instance of unity for reviews, in that everyone lost their goddamned minds to praise it for the things that it set out to do rather than the things that it actually did well. LBP had the same thing going for it, too.
nahAnd BOTW to an extent.
Erik Kain said:"On the other hand, it's always a little bit odd when one publication has its review out so far in advance of every other. It cheapens the perfect score because we can't help but wonder if it's all above board, or if secret deals were struck behind the scenes.
The value of reviews, at least to some degree, lies in their consensus. Outliers are fine, and independent voices can and should rise above mere aggregation. But if there's only one review to choose from, it's almost as useless as having no reviews at all.
So my suggestion would be to take this with a massive, heaping hat full of salt. I have confidence that Super Mario Odyssey will be a good game (I've enjoyed what little I've played) but I wouldn't place much value on this sort of lone review. There's a reason universal embargoes exist, and a reason we feel a little suspicious whenever one publication gets such a hefty jump on all the rest. Thankfully, many other reviews will almost certainly be out before the game launches and savvy consumers can read up ahead of making a purchase."
Technically it's a follow up to Mario 64/Sunshine, in Nintendo's eyes. If anything, 3D Land and World were the sucessors to the Galaxy duology. As told by The Chart™.
I like the second paragraph in your quote. If the value of reviews lies in their consensus, maybe wait until others reviewed the game before you accuse Edge of wrongdoing? What if their score isn't an outlier at all?Did any of you happen to catch that piece from Erik Kain on Forbes about Edge's score?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...uper-mario-odyssey-review-score/#1e1fb07e453f
Is it just me, or does it sound like he's accusing Edge of Paid Reviews?
Did any of you happen to catch that piece from Erik Kain on Forbes about Edge's score?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...uper-mario-odyssey-review-score/#1e1fb07e453f
Is it just me, or does it sound like he's accusing Edge of Paid Reviews?
Super Mario Odyssey isn't coming out for over two more weeks. At this point, we're not sure when review embargoes will lift for the game, or even when review copies will go out to game reviewers.
GTA4 was a rare instance of unity for reviews, in that everyone lost their goddamned minds to praise it for the things that it set out to do rather than the things that it actually did well. LBP had the same thing going for it, too.
This is what makes me interested. Everything after Sunshine was slowly going down hill. Not shit of course, but too linear and nothing like 64 and Sunshine which were both awesome.
Did any of you happen to catch that piece from Erik Kain on Forbes about Edge's score?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...uper-mario-odyssey-review-score/#1e1fb07e453f
Is it just me, or does it sound like he's accusing Edge of Paid Reviews?
This is what makes me interested. Everything after Sunshine was slowly going down hill. Not shit of course, but too linear and nothing like 64 and Sunshine which were both awesome.
BotW got sixty-nine perfect scores. Edge's score is hardly an outlier. And they're the only relevant print magazine still in existance, so that fact probably is the reason they're getting exclusive reviews.Well, I dont think its a coincidence that Edge have got the exclusive reviews of the most recent Zeldas and Marios. I doubt theyre paid, but Nintendo can probably assume theyre going to get pretty favourable scores.
Did any of you happen to catch that piece from Erik Kain on Forbes about Edge's score?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...uper-mario-odyssey-review-score/#1e1fb07e453f
Is it just me, or does it sound like he's accusing Edge of Paid Reviews?
The value of reviews, at least to some degree, lies in their consensus. Outliers are fine, and independent voices can and should rise above mere aggregation. But if there's only one review to choose from, it's almost as useless as having no reviews at all.
This is what makes me interested. Everything after Sunshine was slowly going down hill. Not shit of course, but
Did any of you happen to catch that piece from Erik Kain on Forbes about Edge's score?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...uper-mario-odyssey-review-score/#1e1fb07e453f
Is it just me, or does it sound like he's accusing Edge of Paid Reviews?
Did any of you happen to catch that piece from Erik Kain on Forbes about Edge's score?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikka...uper-mario-odyssey-review-score/#1e1fb07e453f
Is it just me, or does it sound like he's accusing Edge of Paid Reviews?
Wouldnt be so skeptical.
Have heard that SMO is tracking higher than BOTW in terms of reviews/expectations.
We may just have two GOATs in one year.
Sunshine is really really flawed, good controls don't excuse buggy physics, cut corners and shit camera. The idea that Galaxy is worse than Sunshine is laughable.