hey_monkey
Banned
Full article won't be available until tomorrow, but The Stranger posted an excerpt from (writer/activist) Ijeoma Oluo's long interview with Rachel Dolezal and it's already a doozy (surprise):
I'll be happy to update OP when full article is out.
Update: full article is out and it's really well written. This stuck out to me:
This is just a standard white person backlash - I'M NOT PRIVILEGED SO DON'T PAINT ME WITH PRIVILEGE. And it's all here from that. Wow.
roll me around in mud as an appropriative technique if old.
Throughout our conversation, I get the increasing impression that, for someone who claims to love blackness, Rachel Dolezal has little more than contempt for many actual black people and their own black identities.
The dismissive and condescending attitude towards any black people who see blackness differently than she does is woven throughout her comments in our conversation. It is not just our pettiness, it is also our lack of education that is preventing us from getting on Dolezal's level of racial understanding. She informs me multiple times that black people have rejected her because they simply haven't learned yet that race is a social construct created by white supremacists, they simply don't know any better and don't want to: ”I've done my research, I think a lot of people though haven't probably read those books and maybe never will."
”Race is just a social construct" is a retort I get quite often from white people who don't want to talk about black issues anymore. A lot of things in our society are social constructs–money, for example, is one–but the impact that they have on our lives, and the rules by which they operate, are very real. I cannot undo the evils of capitalism simply by pretending to be a millionaire.
Dolezal looks me in the eye and says with a straight face: ”I'm not trying to redefine anything. In fact, I didn't try to coin a transracial term, or any of that stuff."
...When I write about race, I often get people coming back and saying, ‘Why are you focused on this? Race is a social construct.' That's primarily white people who say it because the default of the social construct is, whiteness is invisible... But part of white supremacy is actually never having to acknowledge you're white, freedom from a lot of that because you're the default. My question is, does this actually deconstruct race when it still only goes one way?
”Well," says Rachel, ”but why does it have to just go one way?"
I'll be happy to update OP when full article is out.
Update: full article is out and it's really well written. This stuck out to me:
"I'm not comparing the struggles, okay? Because I never said that my life was the same. I never said that it was the equivalent of slavery, of chattel slavery. I did work and bought all my own clothes and shoes since I was 9 years old. That's not a typical American childhood life," she says. "I worked very hard, but I didn't resonate with white women who were born with a silver spoon. I didn't find a sentence of connection in those stories, or connection with the story of the princess who was looking for a knight in shining armor."
This is just a standard white person backlash - I'M NOT PRIVILEGED SO DON'T PAINT ME WITH PRIVILEGE. And it's all here from that. Wow.
roll me around in mud as an appropriative technique if old.