SolidSnakex said:
I guess the question then is, why? What does anyone gain from having those games go away other than losing a quality gaming franchise?
Well, amazing as it might sound, some of us are still convinced it is a step backwards as far as gaming "growing up" goes -- much like the Mortal Kombat games. It's as though someone developed a very interesting idea, but made sure to spread a layer of controversy and sludge on top JUST enough to make sure that it got some extra shock value. Is that the actual intent of the game itself? Probably not, but it does little to advance games, in the opinion of some folks.
As a really horrible example, suppose one made a WWII history exhibit that was quite detailed and interesting, but also let you use a bayonet to stab dummies, who would them realistically bleed, lose organs, and collapse on the floor. While that might well add some realism and fit with the theme of the war, most normal folks would consider it rather crude and shocking. It's vaguely the same thing -- while one can appreciate the effort at making a game open ended, the amount of violence to innocents that can be achieved (or is thought to be possible) turns off large chunks of society.
Every time this discussion comes up, I feel like I'm trying to explain to my high school class why I don't want them cursing in class.