Fuck that. I have saved so much money not buying chargers or batteries for my PS3 controllers.
Umm, have you seen the way devs/execs in the game industry can talk? I wouldn't doubt it for a second.
he only thing that I do know for definite is that Durango will be running Windows 8. It will essentially be the full version of the OS, minus the desktop side of things. This means itll be running the new WinRT framework, which as a side effect also means that contrary to popular belief MS will be the most indie friendly of all the big 3 next gen.
This is because any app/game that is created for the Windows app store will (after adding controller support of course) be playable on Durango.
In other words, any random person worldwide can pay Microsoft a $60 license fee (for the Windows Store) and submit their app/game to the store where millions of people can then download/buy it. No expensive development kits needed.
Expect to hear much more on WinRT - Durango at Build2013.
Eneloops > built in rechargeable batteries. But if you have a 360 you could have just bought a play kit and it would work just like the PS3 controller, minus the stupidly short cable.
Why can't someone leak what Live will be? Paywall or no paywall is all that matters.
I'd rather just ask you guysSystem on a chip.
A simple Google search would've solved this inquiry for you.
Fuck that. I have saved so much money not buying chargers or batteries for my PS3 controllers.
8 GB GDDR5 is overkill. There's just no use for it with the CPU and GPU that's in the PS4. The only reason why it's there is because Sony found out that Microsoft has 8 GB and had to equal it. Having 4 GB GDDR5 and 4 GB DDR3 would've meant a complete system redesign and loss of unified RAM, so they only had the choice to go to 8 GB GDDR5. Which is costly and not needed.
Funny. The stuff I've been hearing that popped up on my radar 2 weeks ago (after GTC) are not mentioned here. I know who I rather listen to and its not this pastebin post.
That's also extra money to do basically the same thing.
I don't understand why people like spending money so much.
Umm, have you seen the way devs/execs in the game industry can talk? I wouldn't doubt it for a second.
That's also extra money to do basically the same thing.
I don't understand why people like spending money so much.
Makes sense. They can use the 360 SOC for those HMD (Fortaleza) glasses or Kinect or the OS without compromising the Durango performance. And have full BC as an added bonus. It moves the overall performance to around 1.75 Teraflops, so close to PS4. I guess it's also the main reason why they have the Display planes, allowing to merge whatever both APUs do into one resulting image (plus an additional plane for Fortaleza).
Everything else seems very believable and in line with what I have heard elsewhere.
I'd rather have a strong console GPU and have the PCs catch up, rather than mid-range cards be ahead before the consoles are released.
That way the gap doesn't become as pronounced as this generation early on in the life cycle.
Both the PS4 and the rumored specs of the 360 are very under powered for 2013.
$30? I mean, how many do you have? I got a charger with 4 Eneloops for 20, it covers my needs perfectly.
Umm, have you seen the way devs/execs in the game industry can talk? I wouldn't doubt it for a second.
Why can't someone leak what Live will be? Paywall or no paywall is all that matters.
it's a one time purchase for like 30$.
That's also extra money to do basically the same thing.
I don't understand why people like spending money so much.
This is from... a random Twitter account writing on pastebin?
That's the vibe I got as well. I call bullshit (on the things that weren't known before).That drama filled, multi-paragraph rant at the beginning pretty much proves this is from some fake, internet nobody. No real source would be that vain. Full of self-importance and spite. Like your standard 15 year old.
Most xbox live arcade and full game download libraries are massive and would be more incline to cross over then the ps2 library to ps3.PS3 launched with 100% PS2 BC, how did that turnout for them?
360 SoC would be great for BC, but it wouldn't be possible for developers to use its PowerPC hardware at the same time as the main x86 Durango hardware without tremendous effort for very little gain. That part, at least, doesn't pass the bullshit test. If it's in there, it's for BC only.
Other devices use batteries too, you know. You're not tied to a single proprietary battery. Also, the battery is high quality and won't lose its charge as easily as those crappy X360 proprietary batteries. Also, no cords.
If it bothered you that much, dropping £12 on a play and charge kit is no big deal considering how many years you use a console for.That's also extra money to do basically the same thing.
I don't understand why people like spending money so much.
I'm not talking about AA batteries, I'm talking about the rechargeable lithium batteries....the controller cable on my PS3 is like 3 feet long. Every time I have to recharge it I have to stop playing.
I have two rechargeable batteries for my 360 on the other hand. When one dies, I put it in the other one and recharge the dead one and keep on playing
Eneloops > built in rechargeable batteries. But if you have a 360 you could have just bought a play and charge kit and it would work just like the PS3 controller, minus the stupidly short cable.
The guy who wrote this (assuming what he says is even partly true) works in software; he's not a PR man trying to appeal to obnoxious gamers.
Still uses AA batteries.
why
It's not like MS can even profit off of this, there are no 'Microsoft' batteries. I don't understand, is it really that much cheaper than putting a chargeable battery?
edit - Unless they sell that charging kit separately, ugh. Forgot about that.
Or a zero-time purchase for 0$.
Any guy who knows stuff will probably try to make money off it (SuperDae), not randomly put it on Pastebin. I don't think this is legit.
Must have set you back an obscene amount of money.