• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Tekken Tag 2 to be modified due to use of 'Allah' in Saudi Arabia stage

genjiZERO

Member
You have no point so you are trying to pull in unrelated events. This thread is about people asking a question to Harada in an normal way and Harada responding. You are trying to make this a thing about violence simply, because it mentions Muslims. You are essentially punishing people for things they didn't do. Islamic gamers aren't allowed to ask questions and developers aren't allowed to respect their wishes, because there are Islamic terrorist in the world? Or do you believe all Muslims are violent? Is that the context you are banging on about?

Uhm they have the right to ask and the devs have the right to respond kindly. Which seems to annoy you guys greatly, which is what baffles me. What's wrong with respecting the wishes of other people?

Did you not ask why "people overreact to every single thing Muslims do"? That statement itself is necessarily outside of the scope of "people asking a question to Harada in an normal way and Harada responding". So clean the fucking wax out of your ears son. People overreact to every single thing Muslims do, even when it's something as innocuous as asking a question to Harada in an normal way and Harada responding, because in contemporary times there are many examples Muslims either destroying things or killing people over artwork deemed offensive.
 
Every culture is made fun of. I see a ton of horseshit said about the United States, but you don't see me complaining about it.

I think I must have missed those. Maybe they are buried under tons of nazi, communists, and terrorists generalization on movies, games, books and any other medium.
 

2San

Member
Did you not ask why "people overreact to every single thing Muslims do"? That statement itself is necessarily outside of the scope of "people asking a question to Harada in an normal way and Harada responding". So clean the fucking wax out of your ears son. People overreact to every single thing Muslims do, even when it's something as innocuous as asking a question to Harada in an normal way and Harada responding, because in contemporary times there are many examples Muslims either destroying things or killing people over artwork deemed offensive.
I see that clears things up. People are overreacting, because they think all Muslims are the same. You're right people really should stop being such biggots and see the bigger picture.
 

genjiZERO

Member
I see that clears things up. People are overreacting, because they think all Muslims are the same. You're right people really should stop being such biggots and see the bigger picture.

edit: I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic or not, so I'm going to assume that you are not. However, you cannot make the step from criticising an endemic cultural issue within Islam and thinking "all Muslims are the same". There's an endemic problem of pedophilia within Catholicism. That doesn't mean all Catholics are pedophiles or condone it. My statement is that there is an endemic cultural problem within Islam with artwork that some view as offensive or insulting to Islam. In the mildest scenario it's a few people politely asking a developer to remove a bit map, in a more moderate example it's Muslim governments trying to get anti-blasphemy directorates through the UN, and in the worst scenario it's destroying 5,000 year old artifacts or attacking embassies and killing people. Because there are so many examples, and because it's a global phenomenon I don't think this is an unfair criticism. But I agree bigotry is horrible. That's why, as a side, the thing I think Muslims should be offended about isn't artwork, but the stereotyping of Muslim people in the media.
 

cameron

Member
Demanding something be changed is one thing, but I see no issue with simply letting a dev know that you find something to be offensive or inaccurate (or even just questioning the motives). It's part of the feedback a studio would want. If the devs believe whatever outside input has merit, then they can take appropriate action to fix the issue.

I'm fine with the tweet in the OP and the Harada's response to it. Apparently it was an oversight, Harada doesn't want it in there, so he's going to patch it out. Didn't GT5 have a car with a diecast logo on the undercarriage, a non-religious but still trivial issue, that was later patched? The fear of religious extremists doesn't have to be the primary reason a dev would patch an issue like the one described in the OP.
 

Sayah

Member
Because you don't complain it doesn't mean others don't have a right to complain.

It's just basics of democracy. They don't have to change it, but it doesn't mean others can't complain.


Some people are so trying to represent themselves as liberal and modern that they just fall from the other side.

Pretty much this.
"Sorry Muslims, we tell you what you have the right to be offended by because we totally understand your religion and culture. And no, you do not have the right to peacefully interact with a game developer about your concerns."

"Sorry game developer, your work is being censored and your freedom of speech is being infringed upon even though you are willingly removing a floor texture and initially never intended for something like this to even be there in the first place."

It's quite clear who is the one being irrational and silly. So much ignorance and hypocrisy, it's baffling.
 

Izayoi

Banned
Pretty much this.
"Sorry Muslims, we tell you what you have the right to be offended by because we totally understand your religion and culture. And no, you do not have the right to peacefully interact with a game developer about your concerns."
Nobody here is saying that.

"Sorry game developer, your work is being censored and your freedom of speech is being infringed upon even though you are willingly removing a floor texture and initially never intended for something like this to even be there in the first place."
Nobody here is saying that either.

The thread has gone a little off-topic, and now seems to be about the reactions in general to offensive art as opposed to being only about this particular case. Can't really blame anyone for that, seeing as there isn't a whole lot to discuss about this story specifically.
 

2San

Member
edit: I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic or not, so I'm going to assume that you are not. However, you cannot make the step from criticising an endemic cultural issue within Islam and thinking "all Muslims are the same". There's an endemic problem of pedophilia within Catholicism. That doesn't mean all Catholics are pedophiles or condone it. My statement is that there is an endemic cultural problem within Islam with artwork that some view as offensive or insulting to Islam. In the mildest scenario it's a few people politely asking a developer to remove a bit map, in a more moderate example it's Muslim governments trying to get anti-blasphemy directorates through the UN, and in the worst scenario it's destroying 5,000 year old artifacts or attacking embassies and killing people. Because there are so many examples, and because it's a global phenomenon I don't think this is an unfair criticism.
It becomes unfair criticism when you are attributing the atrocities of others to people who have nothing to do with it. The Muslims in this case have done nothing wrong and Harada responding has done nothing wrong.
But I agree bigotry is horrible. That's why, as a side, the thing I think Muslims should be offended about isn't artwork, but the stereotyping of Muslim people in the media.
And here you are having a problem with Muslims wanting an accurate representation.
 

Sayah

Member
Nobody here is saying that.


Nobody here is saying that either.

The thread has gone a little off-topic, and now seems to be about the reactions in general to offensive art as opposed to being only about this particular case. Can't really blame anyone for that, seeing as there isn't a whole lot to discuss about this story specifically.


No one is saying that? LOL
Read through the comments. I don't want to go through this thread to actually provide you with the various examples present in this thread.

I refrain myself from discussions like this because they are most often pointless but it was a Tekken thread so I got involved anyway. At the end of the day, I don't really care what anyone has to say because I'm going to continue playing TTT2 and continue enjoying it.
 

I-hate-u

Member
I am a Muslim who is offended by the use of "Allah" on the ground where the characters step on. I would not have had an issue if it was on the wall or something. I respect Harada for putting an Arab represented stage in Tekken complying with our complaint. All the responses from Muslims to Harada where in line from what I saw.

So whats the problem here gaf? That some people actually care about their religion and culture where they do not want them demeaned in any way?
 

Codeblue

Member
Yeah, I'm not seeing the issue.

Dude asked nicely and Harada pretty much said "ok, we'll change it".

This isn't like OoT and LBP where people asked for it to be changed over nothing. Stepping on something is a big deal in the Middle East. Why do you think that one of the first things the Americans did in Baghdad is remove George Bush Sr's face from that hotel floor?
 

genjiZERO

Member
It becomes unfair criticism when you are attributing the atrocities of others to people who have nothing to do with it. The Muslims in this case have done nothing wrong and Harada responding has done nothing wrong.

And here you are having a problem with Muslims wanting an accurate representation.

it's OK to ignore my criticism. Just don't be surprised next time something like this happens and people start to overreact.
 
Surprisingly, there are people in the world who have different beliefs than what you may have. For a deeply religious people, the use of their icons and deities can easily be considered offensive.
sarcasm
Although nothing will ever top how awesome this is:

Buddy-Jesus.jpg


Especially the whole bit with Carlin.. so priceless.
 

RoyalFool

Banned
Seems fair enough, it's a bit of a silly move to put text you can't understand into your game to be honest. At least it's been dealt with in a non-threatening manner.
 
I get offended by all sorts of things that aren't necessarily intended to be offensive, yet I don't expect the world to rearrange itself to accommodate my sensitivities. I don't phone up the Academy Awards every time someone thanks God in an acceptance speech.

Muslims who are offended by a pretend floor carving in a video game should take it upon themselves to ignore or avoid the offensive material. It's unreasonable to expect it to be removed. What message is Harada sending by having the stage changed? Surely not one of tolerance. If I tweeted some developer and said that as an atheist I'm strongly opposed to the promotion of religion by prominently displayed Christian iconography, you can bet they wouldn't fall all over themselves to remove all the crosses from their game. More likely, they'd tell me to grow a thicker skin and piss off. And they'd be right. In a world where nearly everything is bound to offend someone, all of us need to be willing to—that's right—tolerate things that incidentally hurt our feelings.

It goes beyond hurt feelings...there is religious basis for the concerns. Muslims are obligated by the religion to strive against what may offend Allah. So as far as being Muslim goes, they can't "take it upon themselves to ignore or avoid the offensive material".

What's unreasonable is to expect anyone to circumvent their own belief just because you think it's too much.

I'm not really educated on atheism but it seems to me that you should be the last person to comment on how religious people should behave
 
It goes beyond hurt feelings...there is religious basis for the concerns. Muslims are obligated by the religion to strive against what may offend Allah. So as far as being Muslim goes, they can't "take it upon themselves to ignore or avoid the offensive material".

What's unreasonable is to expect anyone to circumvent their own belief just because you think it's too much.

I'm not really educated on atheism but it seems to me that you should be the last person to comment on how religious people should behave
What if my belief is that I should hang your entire family upside down and drink their blood to satisfy my personal god?
 

Vitacat

Member
I am a Muslim who is offended by the use of "Allah" on the ground where the characters step on. I would not have had an issue if it was on the wall or something. I respect Harada for putting an Arab represented stage in Tekken complying with our complaint. All the responses from Muslims to Harada where in line from what I saw.

So whats the problem here gaf? That some people actually care about their religion and culture where they do not want them demeaned in any way?

I think in this case muslims have a valid point, and it seems it has been made respectfully, and the response from the game devs has been equally respectful. So win win. I think we can and should all rally around this positive interaction.

What sucks is when some muslims go apeshit over cartoons or videos etc., and start doing actual, violence in reaction. That is unacceptable to Westerners, and should always been roundly condemned, and not appeased. I have a very low opinion of religion in general, so the last thing I want to see is any religion gaining political power in the world.

It goes beyond hurt feelings...there is religious basis for the concerns. Muslims are obligated by the religion to strive against what may offend Allah. So as far as being Muslim goes, they can't "take it upon themselves to ignore or avoid the offensive material".

Ah, and here we have the crux of the problem.

If that is true, then muslims desperately need to reform their world view. Expecting the entire rest of the world to adhere to muslim tenets on expression is not going to work out. They have the right to expect their own co-religionists to behave a certain way, but not others.

Yes, like anyone else, they can complain about expression they dislike, but when they go beyond complaint and start killing, threatening etc., then it becomes impossible to respect their complaints. Lastly, also consider how non-muslims are portrayed in many Islamic countries -- i.e. hateful caricatures and condemnations of Jews and Christians are all too common. Look at Saudi Arabia, where the King just "demanded" (his word, not mine) a UN resolution against expression involving religious ridicule -- look at the stuff they teach their kids about Jews & Christians. I'm all for respectful INTERACTIONS between cultures, but that's the key -- it has to be interactive, meaning it goes both ways. Whether or not that's actually possible for Islam I don't know.
 

Dawg

Member
I have no problem with people believing in any form of a god, as I like to believe there's more "once we die".

However, I will NEVER understand fanatics like this. Sure, in this example, they asked the developer nicely and the developer agreed to remove it.

Yet, I feel this could of went another way when the developer would answer "no, deal with it" (which they should). I think the developer would receive death threats and such, like the recent mohammed movie.

Every religion is about peace, yet the first thing these fanatics do, is threatening to kill/murder people when they make fun of allah/mohammed/god/whatever. "Yeah you should never murder people guys. But if they make fun of us, it's ok. No problem!"

Ugh, hypocrisy...
 

Kurtofan

Member
Yet, I feel this could of went another way when the developer would answer "no, deal with it" (which they should). I think the developer would receive death threats and such, like the recent mohammed movie.

Tell us more about this hypothetical situation that didn't happen.

It's crazy, nothing Muslims will ever do will be able to wipe that murderer stigma.The anti-Muslim hysteria is getting annoying.
 

Monocle

Member
It goes beyond hurt feelings...there is religious basis for the concerns. Muslims are obligated by the religion to strive against what may offend Allah. So as far as being Muslim goes, they can't "take it upon themselves to ignore or avoid the offensive material".

What's unreasonable is to expect anyone to circumvent their own belief just because you think it's too much.

I'm not really educated on atheism but it seems to me that you should be the last person to comment on how religious people should behave
With all due respect (that is to say, precious little), a "religious basis" provides absolutely no support for the legitimacy of a belief. Quite the opposite, actually. What's really unreasonable here is the way that people use tradition to justify their entitled attitudes.

What about my beliefs? Are they not worth consideration? As a secularist, I could choose to style myself an heir to the world's richest and most fruitful intellectual tradition. It would be somewhat less immodest than claiming my personal feelings are endorsed by the supreme overlord of everything. Less immodest, to reduce the scope just slightly, than assuming the support of upward of two billion cothinkers. I could make that appeal to tradition, but I don't. An ideological pissing match wouldn't serve to clarify the main issue, which is how this particular episode fits into the larger pattern of coercion involving Islam and art deemed offensive by the few Muslims who commend themselves as the voice of the many.
 

Vitacat

Member
Every religion is about peace, yet the first thing these fanatics do, is threatening to kill/murder people when they make fun of allah/mohammed/god/whatever. "Yeah you should never murder people guys. But if they make fun of us, it's ok. No problem!"

Overall a good thought, however do more research on the bolded part. The definition of "peace" can vary greatly between different systems of beliefs. It simply is not true, no matter how much people wish it was, that all religions are about "peace," or at least the commonly understood Western secular version of peace.
 

Dawg

Member
Tell us more about this hypothetical situation that didn't happen.

It's crazy, nothing Muslims will ever do will be able to wipe that murderer stigma.The anti-Muslim hysteria is getting annoying.

Earlier this month, a modern warfare 2 (MW2!) map was removed because of muslims. That game is several years old, but it HAD to be removed once some people were offended by it. Now this again. It's just silly. I'm not even targeting muslims, but religion in general. I would be as annoyed when christians or any other religion would whine about these things.
 
Isn't that the real problem here? It's okay for someone to be indoctrinated to the point where they become violently offended by a name in a fictional video game in a fictional location that has fictional people stepping on it? We're supposed to just let that go, and bend to their every whim? Give me a fucking break.

Actually no, the real problem here is that Muslims actually have a legitimate complaint about something for once (i.e., a digital representation of a religious subject to them, "Allah", being stepped on, and on a mass-market product) and people here are overreacting simply because there was a precedent of Muslims protesting something in the past which, I would be the first to agree, were ridiculous actions.

If they were complaining about, say, the word "Allah" being displayed on the wall or posted in the game, then yeah, I wouldn't be defending their point. But what's funny is that for once, they actually have a legit claim to be offended and suddenly people are calling them out for being entitled little pricks over it.
 

DR2K

Banned
I am a Muslim who is offended by the use of "Allah" on the ground where the characters step on. I would not have had an issue if it was on the wall or something. I respect Harada for putting an Arab represented stage in Tekken complying with our complaint. All the responses from Muslims to Harada where in line from what I saw.

So whats the problem here gaf? That some people actually care about their religion and culture where they do not want them demeaned in any way?

No doubt that if left alone people might be harmed for this. That's the problem that most Americans would have, we don't respond well to terrorism. The way this situation was handled is fine, but there's more to it and that's what people don't like.
 

Zing

Banned
I have trouble understanding why someone would care that their god's name is on a floor. Is this one of those superstitions passed on for so many generations that no one questions its absurdity? It reminds me of how people use to say you had to burn the flag if it ever touched the ground.
 

jaxword

Member
And that's not flippant?You didn't even read the thread and you judge people on their posting style.

I certainly did read the thread, thanks.

And since I didn't find any convincing arguments, I asked for one from Glass Rebel, and Glass Rebel couldn't even come up with one.
 

GrizzNKev

Banned
So many people completely missing why this is an issue. This isn't the only time it has happened so stop pretending that it is.
 

hatchx

Banned
All I know is that unless they put that blurry texture BACK IN THE GAME, I'm cancelling my pre-order.


You have until November 18th Namco.
 

SMT

this show is not Breaking Bad why is it not Breaking Bad? it should be Breaking Bad dammit Breaking Bad
And yet somehow in Lebanon...

Gamestop - One killed - Beirut.

Marc-Geahchan.jpg



prediction
 

Trey

Member
So many people completely missing why this is an issue. This isn't the only time it has happened so stop pretending that it is.

It's a ground texture on the floor of a stage that can be (relatively) easily removed. The offended party asked nicely that Namco consider removing the symbol, to which they complied. Nothing of consequence was lost. It's a non-issue. Full stop.
 

GavinGT

Banned
I am a Muslim who is offended by the use of "Allah" on the ground where the characters step on. I would not have had an issue if it was on the wall or something. I respect Harada for putting an Arab represented stage in Tekken complying with our complaint. All the responses from Muslims to Harada where in line from what I saw.

So whats the problem here gaf? That some people actually care about their religion and culture where they do not want them demeaned in any way?

What if a character were to wall-jump off of it?
 
I think in this case muslims have a valid point, and it seems it has been made respectfully, and the response from the game devs has been equally respectful. So win win. I think we can and should all rally around this positive interaction.

What sucks is when some muslims go apeshit over cartoons or videos etc., and start doing actual, violence in reaction. That is unacceptable to Westerners, and should always been roundly condemned, and not appeased. I have a very low opinion of religion in general, so the last thing I want to see is any religion gaining political power in the world.



Ah, and here we have the crux of the problem.

If that is true, then muslims desperately need to reform their world view. Expecting the entire rest of the world to adhere to muslim tenets on expression is not going to work out. They have the right to expect their own co-religionists to behave a certain way, but not others.

Yes, like anyone else, they can complain about expression they dislike, but when they go beyond complaint and start killing, threatening etc., then it becomes impossible to respect their complaints. Lastly, also consider how non-muslims are portrayed in many Islamic countries -- i.e. hateful caricatures and condemnations of Jews and Christians are all too common. Look at Saudi Arabia, where the King just "demanded" (his word, not mine) a UN resolution against expression involving religious ridicule -- look at the stuff they teach their kids about Jews & Christians. I'm all for respectful INTERACTIONS between cultures, but that's the key -- it has to be interactive, meaning it goes both ways. Whether or not that's actually possible for Islam I don't know.

Of course its possible for Islam. Not saying any of that is right, but also look at how Islam is presented in Western media. The first we think about in a situation like this, involving Islam, is terrorism or violence. Why? The terrorism bit has as much to do with Islam as Branch Davidians or the KKK have to do with Christianity. Technically, terrorism shouldn't even be in this discussion.
 

GrizzNKev

Banned
It's a ground texture on the floor of a stage that can be (relatively) easily removed. The offended party asked nicely that Namco consider removing the symbol, to which they complied. Nothing of consequence was lost. It's a non-issue. Full stop.

So anyone that's ever offended by anything in a game can request that it be removed and expect it to happen. Okay.

Of course its possible for Islam. Not saying any of that is right, but also look at how Islam is presented in Western media. The first we think about in a situation like this, involving Islam, is terrorism or violence. Why? The terrorism bit has as much to do with Islam as Branch Davidians or the KKK have to do with Christianity. Technically, terrorism shouldn't even be in this discussion.

That's really easy to answer. Because in the frequent cases of threats of violence, the reason cited is almost always the religion. Whether or not that is an accurate representation of the people or their culture doesn't matter because it will never reach the ears of the rest of the world. Shouldn't this problem be solved by ignoring the extremists and fanatics instead of giving in all the time and censoring media?
 
Top Bottom