• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The Dark Knight Rises (Batman 3) - No Riddler

Status
Not open for further replies.
Solo said:
ITT: people discover shooting day-for-night for the first time.....

Its not a new thing, people.

It may not be new for you but it is for me.
I'm just curious about how they do it etc.
 
Kyaw said:
It may not be new for you but it is for me.
I'm just curious about how they do it etc.

Day for night, also known as nuit américaine ("American night"), is the name for cinematographic techniques used to simulate a night scene; such as using tungsten-balanced rather than daylight-balanced film stock or with special blue filters and also under-exposing the shot (usually in post-production) to create the illusion of darkness or moonlight.

Historically, infrared movie film was used to achieve an equivalent look with black-and-white film.

A great way to achieve this effect is to tune the white balance of the camera to a yellow source if there is no tungsten setting. Another way to make a more believable night scene is to underexpose the footage to the desired degree of night/darkness. This depends on the amount of light shown or believed to be in the given scene.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day_for_night
 
purple cobra said:
About these pics:
Batman's seeing action in the daytime? I thought he was a nocturnal hero?
Just wondering...

He isn't nocturnal, he is out when he is needed.
Night is just when most shit goes down and it is not as easy to vanish in broad daylight.
 
Hex said:
He isn't nocturnal, he is out when he is needed.
Night is just when most shit goes down and it is not as easy to vanish in broad daylight.
But how does he see the Batsignal in day time?
 
Lonestar said:
I want to say, the scene where the Joker attacks the Police Convoy was in daylight, specifically the part under the elevated road (when the Police Cargo Truck is knocked into the river).

Video of that stunt being filmed in TDK here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k99Xb1mEZg

If you're going to do that it still needs to be dark enough for all the city lights to show up, the middle of the day would not cut it.
 
Damnit I've been avoiding this thread for some days now - the last few pages have been black bar hell.

Call me back when all the spoilers are gone!
 
dmshaposv said:
Damnit I've been avoiding this thread for some days now - the last few pages have been black bar hell.

Call me back when all the spoilers are gone!

See you a couple months after the movie comes out then.
 
Solo said:
ITT: people discover shooting day-for-night for the first time.....

Its not a new thing, people.
It's really obvious sometimes too.

People casting shadows/selfshadowing when they should not.
 
Marleyman said:
You act as if this is common knowledge to the average person..come on.

I thought most people were aware of the practice. Its not some big industry secret or anything, and like the poster above me said, sometimes its so obvious that I don't know how anyone could miss it.

28 Weeks Later is an example that instantly comes to mind for overwhelmingly obvious.
 
Solo said:
I thought most people were aware of the practice. Its not some big industry secret or anything, and like the poster above me said, sometimes its so obvious that I don't know how anyone could miss it.

28 Weeks Later is an example that instantly comes to mind for overwhelmingly obvious.
There's a difference between shooting a scene in dayight then 'dimming it down', but to shoot a snowing scene and then have it totally at night (which I still don't think it'll be) can surprise someone..

It's a common practice, but to what extent exactly..
 
Solo said:
28 Weeks Later is an example that instantly comes to mind for overwhelmingly obvious.
That was supposed to be at night? It always looked like it was either shot at late sunset or early dawn.
 
Solo said:
I thought most people were aware of the practice. Its not some big industry secret or anything, and like the poster above me said, sometimes its so obvious that I don't know how anyone could miss it.

28 Weeks Later is an example that instantly comes to mind for overwhelmingly obvious.

I just never caught it for whatever reason.
 
MrPink93485 said:
DK-32148r_502.jpg


Kinda small, but yeah, plenty of "night" scenes were actually shot in daylight for the Dark Knight, such as the Hong Kong scene.
No, quite a bit was shot at dusk/night. That picture looks more like set-up/rehearsal.

The Hong Kong sequence is a poor example of day-for-night because it was a combination of interiors with green screen, on-location shooting with actors; IMAX plates shot with a helicopter and Batman composited later in post, etc...
 
Fetts_Jets said:
No, quite a bit was shot at dusk/night. That picture looks more like set-up/rehearsal.

The Hong Kong sequence is a poor example of day-for-night because it was a combination of interiors with green screen, on-location shooting with actors; IMAX plates shot with a helicopter and Batman composited later in post, etc...

Yep, they had to build cgi replicas of the skyscrapers too. They were originally planning to do the skyscraper jump for real but weren't allowed, shame.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRsS4mBYhe4
 
Maybe it's just me, but I actually think that Bale looks a bit better in the Batman suit. Maybe it's because he put on more muscle, or maybe it's because they changed the suit. It doesn't look like his neck is so thin anymore.
 
Extollere said:
Maybe it's just me, but I actually think that Bale looks a bit better in the Batman suit. Maybe it's because he put on more muscle, or maybe it's because they changed the suit. It doesn't look like his neck is so thin anymore.

I read 'Bale' as 'Bane' and said WHAT
 
BobTheFork said:
that almost looks like
Bane all dried out of vemon, possibly the very very last part.
fuck

It was a rehearsal.
Lack of mask was only for practice. Also, everyone fights during the real thing.
 
BobTheFork said:
Well I assumed someone way way skinnier would be in for that shot of emaciated Bane (a shot I'm fully expecting to be in the film).

Bale could play skinny Bane, or they could just splice in footage from The Mechanic.
 
Extollere said:
Maybe it's just me, but I actually think that Bale looks a bit better in the Batman suit. Maybe it's because he put on more muscle, or maybe it's because they changed the suit. It doesn't look like his neck is so thin anymore.
he was way too thin in the dark knight. liked him more when he was not anorexic
tdk-dec30-batdarknew3.jpg
 
derFeef said:
Ugh, Anne Hathaway is in this? I do not like her at all.
You've met her?
KuGsj.gif


But really man? Rachel Getting Married, Brokeback Mountain? None of those performances work for you?
She's so innocuous I can't imagine having an aversion to her acting...

Sorry, just curious.
 
I don't know what to say...That looks nothing like catwoman to me :( Instead of a mask she will have those fancy goggles? and the catsuit has strange pigmentation and it's not latex! (not tight)
 
derFeef said:
I do not like her as an actress, obviously.
I was joking obviously.
I was hoping you'd elaborate a bit out of curiosity. Seems like an odd actress to have a negative reaction to. Edited my post, but a bit late I suppose.
3AQmK.gif


ALSO...
In before nerds rage that Selina Kyle doesn't look enough like comic book Cat Woman, and judge the movie on those flimsy merits!
 
raphier said:
I don't know what to say...That looks nothing like catwoman to me :( Instead of a mask she will have those fancy goggles? and the catsuit has strange pigmentation and it's not latex! (not tight)
That is Selena Kyle, not Cat Woman.
3AQmK.gif
 
raphier said:
Selina Kyle doesn't wear bandit suit and stupid goggles.
I haven't seen the movie, but apparently she does? Unless the picture isn't what it says it is? Have you seen the film or read the screenplay?
I mean, who says Selina can't do some silly shit before she becomes cat woman? She needs the costume and the name straight out the gate?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom