That's less than I thought actually.Ultra Magnanimous said:
That's less than I thought actually.Ultra Magnanimous said:
SantaCruZer said:omg we just hit 10 pages without it being revealed :lol
marsomega said:How many hours till the unofficial official unveiling?
It's okay. It would be badass with depth though (yeah 3D again). Notice, the player keeps missing the enemy because he doesn't know when to swing. He doesn't know if the enemy is within sword striking distance. Either way aside from FPS's I hope Rev gets a good amount of lightgun games, racers and classic 2D style games.Salmon said:
Ultra Magnanimous said:
DrGAKMAN said:Overall performance will be that of the other systems *running on SDTV* resolutions. Since less "power" is required for good SDTV visuals, hardware (and software) development costs are but a ~fraction~ of competing next-generation systems/games running at HDTV resolutions.
OG_Original Gamer said:Yeah, thats total. Including the dvd drive, harddrive, CPU, GPU. I'm speaking on processors specifically.
hadareud said:What I meant was that 85 for the CPU alone is a lot, I mean really alot for a console. The Rev would melt with a chip like this in it.
DrGAKMAN said:![]()
There it is!
Broadway:
-under 2GHz
-90nm MPU fabrication process
-under 10watts
-does NES, SNES & N64 emulation on it's own (saves on power in emulation mode)
-upgrades NES, SNES & N64 ROM's
-lots of embedded cache (8MB?)
-performance improved by easier single-thread developement, existing GCN API, the added PPU & well-balanced speed/power for top-notch 480p visuals
Hollywood:
-about 500Mhz
-manufactured by NEC in GCN's fabrication plants
-about 25watts
-latest dolby, direct X and shader capabilities
-Revolution exclussive feature effects like "cube-mapping"
-lot's of embedded cache (4MB?)
-performance equal to competing hardware while running full effects, AA, 60fps @ 480p
PPU:
-offsets heat by doing alot of the # crunching for Broadway
-physics calculation handled for 3D spacial movement in each player's interface
-free's up Broadway to handle more AI, gameplay engines & overall system performance
Main Memory:
-128MB 1T-SRAM
-split into 32MB "chunks" to offset heat
-very low latency, very fast...creating no memory speed bottlenecks
-no slower secondary memory in the system
Disc Drive:
-over 8GB capacity discs based on DVD-ROM
-very slim, slot-loading drive for taking GCN, Revolution & DVD discs
-4X speed, direct streaming to system memory for low load times
Built-in Flash Memory:
-for game saves, settings & storing downloadable ROM's
-in emulation mode, can be used as "scratch pad" storage to save on power
-expandable through SD card slot
Overall performance will be that of the other systems *running on SDTV* resolutions. Since less "power" is required for good SDTV visuals, hardware (and software) development costs are but a ~fraction~ of competing next-generation systems/games running at HDTV resolutions.
Shogmaster said:My buddy actually measured the draw with his high faluntin' geeko equipment and 160W is more like when the machine is just running the dashboard. When games get going, it's at least 50% more.
hadareud said:why do people still think it will have a ppu?
hadareud said:why do people still think it will have a ppu?
marsomega said:I don't see how Nintendo could have paid close to or equal to what Microsoft paid and only have the RV515 to show for it.
Amir0x said:because they're dumb. Hasn't GAF taught you anything?
Mrbob said:Speaking of physics, there goes the thought Revolution will be capable of advanced physics. This is the area I want to see the greatest jump next gen and Revolution just won't be able to keep up. But I get a magic wand!
Mrbob said:Speaking of physics, there goes the thought Revolution will be capable of advanced physics. This is the area I want to see the greatest jump next gen and Revolution just won't be able to keep up. But I get a magic wand!
Scotch said:I give this thread a C-
Amir0x said:Let's just wait for the actual info before we speculate as to the extent of the step down. I just hope it's not as disappointing as Matt IGN seems to be implying (wtf less than even 256MB of RAM?), because visuals are half the reason I play games.
malek4980 said:Here's a secret Amirox, it's less than 256MB
plus I had sex with my great grandmother, and I got her pregnant...
oh wait secret emailer...
littlewig said:If the specs end up being weak, is this the first time the trolls have been right?
Amir0x said:Let's just wait for the actual info before we speculate as to the extent of the step down. I just hope it's not as disappointing as Matt IGN seems to be implying (wtf less than even 256MB of RAM?), because visuals are half the reason I play games.
Mrbob said:PPU ON REVOLUTION FTW! AND ONLY 199! :lol
PPU would make Revolution just as expensive as the X360 and PS3, even taking in their downgraded specs.
Give up the PPU dream! It isn't happening on this new round of consoles!
Cosmozone said:I can't stay awake long enough for the (preliminary) specs to arrive, alas. :-( Call me weak.
Here's something for the rest of the wait:
![]()
Mrbob said:PPU ON REVOLUTION FTW! AND ONLY 199! :lol
PPU would make Revolution just as expensive as the X360 and PS3, even taking in their downgraded specs.
Give up the PPU dream! It isn't happening on this new round of consoles!
Amir0x said:Let's just wait for the actual info before we speculate as to the extent of the step down. I just hope it's not as disappointing as Matt IGN seems to be implying (wtf less than even 256MB of RAM?), because visuals are half the reason I play games.
SolidSnakex said:Well...atleast we'll get a new Mario (that'll hopefully be much better than SUnshine).
SolidSnakex said:Well...atleast we'll get a new Mario (that'll hopefully be much better than SUnshine).
soundwave05 said:And the Revolution looks really sexy asthetically. And online play. And hopefully a new Punch-Out! as well. And some Namco lightgun shooters.
soundwave05 said:And the Revolution looks really sexy asthetically. And online play. And hopefully a new Punch-Out! as well. And some Namco lightgun shooters.
![]()
littlewig said:Revolution is weaker, so it cost more to make games for it?
Love that logic.
Kleegamefan said:Threads like these are what defines GAF, the greatest game-related website in the world....
BTW, reactions to this thread sicken me.....
Letter to Elise said:He's saying it costs more to downgrade the assets to the REV levels. Come on now, littlewig.
~l2e
mrklaw said:can someone post a new thread when the news is actually released? It'll be impossible to find the actual information otherwise.
mrklaw said:can someone post a new thread when the news is actually released? It'll be impossible to find the actual information otherwise.