I don't really see what's hilarious about it or why people are being so derisive in bringing this up:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=132704069&postcount=310
This is from October. There's a couple of things worth touching on there. One, the game may have indeed been in a troubled state but still turned out ok. 10/10 reviews don't necessarily mean that production was smooth. Two, if working conditions were bad then they were bad. Just because we are getting a great product as a result doesn't undermine complaints about long crunch times.
Or, maybe the person was jaded and exaggerating out of bitterness. I don't know. A number of things could be at play here. But just because the final product delivered doesn't mean that these posts are automatically BS.