toddhunter
Member
Just reading this made me feel tired. Where do you get the energy to do such a thing...?
It is easy. I have had a novel planned every year since I was about 14.
Just reading this made me feel tired. Where do you get the energy to do such a thing...?
Lots of planning in advance plus my love for writing.=p
It is easy. I have had a novel planned every year since I was about 14.
When you guys are ready to bottle and sell that shit, I will be first in line to buy it. \[-_-]/
I got an email from Amazon about mystery suggestions and the first one was Freeze Kill. I don't know if the list is randomized for different emails, but I thought it was pretty cool.
An idea alone won't get you very far on its own merits.Is an idea enough to write something or do I need to make more of a storyline?
An idea alone won't get you very far on its own merits.
Me personally? Not really, not for anything more than a couple thousand words in length.So you can't go with the flow? Like start writing and see where it takes you?
So you can't go with the flow? Like start writing and see where it takes you?
That's what I do. Granted I've only written short stories, it's probably harder to do with a novel.So you can't go with the flow? Like start writing and see where it takes you?
Some people think writers divide into two types: planners and pantsers. The theory goes that planners plan out exactly where their novel is going with outlines and then follow the outline. Pantsers go by the seat of their pants, starting with a character in a situation and then seeing where the hell it leads them.
In reality, there's probably more of a spectrum. Some people do extensive outlining down to the last detail. Some people do some outlining, but feel free to veer away from the plan if they feel so moved. Some people have a beginning and ending in mind, and then improvise the middle. Some people have no plan at all and just wing it all the way. etc
So yes, you can absolutely go with the flow and see how it goes. Maybe that's the type of writing that works for you. The only way to find out is to try it out.
As far as "wasting your best idea," I'd say just do it. New ideas will come more easily when you don't have this "best" one taking up a lot of space in your mind. You may find that it's not so great after all. You may find that it is great, but that your writing doesn't live up to what was in your head (I find this is typical even for ideas that aren't great ). But even if it's not perfect this go-round, you can always come back to it again later when you've improved.
I lost my job, but I knew it was coming so I have enough saved up to get by without one for about a year. I'm currently brushing up on my SQL scripting, and it's depressing me.
Great post. I always saw writing a novel as this impossible dream until I read King's book on it and it seems like he's a guy just going with the flow.
I'll start my novel soon I guess. I have an outline of what I want to do with a beginning and an end.
I lost my job, but I knew it was coming so I have enough saved up to get by without one for about a year. Used to work in IT, but now I'd like to shoot for a job that involves writing in some way, and not necessarily fiction. Only I don't know where to start. Any suggestion of things I ought to look into? I have no professional experience, except for a few video game reviews on websites that no longer exist, so it's a little hard to put them on a resume. I'm currently brushing up on my SQL scripting, and it's depressing me.
That's me right there.The theory goes that planners plan out exactly where their novel is going with outlines and then follow the outline.
Great post. I always saw writing a novel as this impossible dream until I read King's book on it and it seems like he's a guy just going with the flow.
I'll start my novel soon I guess. I have an outline of what I want to do with a beginning and an end.
That's me right there.
I make tons and tons changes as I work on it for months, in fact, they often turn out different from what I originally put down to try to improve it to make the writing easier in the long run.Are you super strict about it or do you leave room for changes/improvisation? I couldn't imagine writing everything based on an outline. As a guide, sure, but sometimes I have ideas that I hadn't even thought of until I start writing.
Are you super strict about it or do you leave room for changes/improvisation? I couldn't imagine writing everything based on an outline. As a guide, sure, but sometimes I have ideas that I hadn't even thought of until I start writing.
It doesn't have to be a very strict outline. Even the most basic of frameworks will help you stay on track in terms of the overall story. Then you can let the characters swim however they want, as long as you get from A to B.
Or, if you wanted to go further and outline some plot points and goals as well, you could fill out of these babies. It's simplistic, and there are many different ways to plot your story, but this one is the most basic (and tried and true).
My own super raw outline example from before (with bits whited out/changed):
Question for you guys. What's your opinion on novels that are very fight-scene heavy?
I ask because the only beta-reader that's actually started my second book isn't too crazy about it and says it would be better suited to a visual medium and doesn't flow very well because of all the fights. Now this guy is by no means my target audience (he's like 65 and reads mostly romance), but he also really liked my first novel and gave some super helpful feedback.
It got me wondering if I shouldn't have placed such a big focus on fights and that I fucked up massively by spending countless hours on it. But then I think of other stuff that's fight-scene heavy like Mistborn and a bunch of YA stuff and I think it's fine; it's just not the kind of thing this guy is into. I'd really like to believe the latter since I do want to turn it into a series, but the thought that I wasted my time is really getting to me.
What do you guys think?
Sometimes people that try to help get very prescriptive by accident, and start trying to give you what they feel is the solution (cut back on fight scenes) rather than giving you the problem (I'm having a hard time keeping up).
Thanks! This is really helpful!
Question for you guys. What's your opinion on novels that are very fight-scene heavy?
I ask because the only beta-reader that's actually started my second book isn't too crazy about it and says it would be better suited to a visual medium and doesn't flow very well because of all the fights. Now this guy is by no means my target audience (he's like 65 and reads mostly romance), but he also really liked my first novel and gave some super helpful feedback.
It got me wondering if I shouldn't have placed such a big focus on fights and that I fucked up massively by spending countless hours on it. But then I think of other stuff that's fight-scene heavy like Mistborn and a bunch of YA stuff and I think it's fine; it's just not the kind of thing this guy is into. I'd really like to believe the latter since I do want to turn it into a series, but the thought that I wasted my time is really getting to me.
What do you guys think?
Cyan and Adol already covered it, but if you're still worried, have you tried doing a pinpoint graph of how many fights you really do have and how many pages go between each one (cool down/lead up to next fight)? Sometimes seeing it visually can help you get a better idea if it is overloaded, or give you peace of mind that it's not.
Question for you guys. What's your opinion on novels that are very fight-scene heavy?
I ask because the only beta-reader that's actually started my second book isn't too crazy about it and says it would be better suited to a visual medium and doesn't flow very well because of all the fights. Now this guy is by no means my target audience (he's like 65 and reads mostly romance), but he also really liked my first novel and gave some super helpful feedback.
It got me wondering if I shouldn't have placed such a big focus on fights and that I fucked up massively by spending countless hours on it. But then I think of other stuff that's fight-scene heavy like Mistborn and a bunch of YA stuff and I think it's fine; it's just not the kind of thing this guy is into. I'd really like to believe the latter since I do want to turn it into a series, but the thought that I wasted my time is really getting to me.
What do you guys think?
No graph, but I made note of it all on the first proofread. In my opinion, the character development, world building and lead up to the next fight between each one is perfectly fine. I cut a few fights down that I could tell were dragging and added some more cool down after one, but outside that, I didn't see much to change.
Once I get more opinions, I'll know where to go with all of this. Was planning on starting the sequel within a few days, but it seems like I'll need to wait a bit longer.
Took H.Pros advice and made a nice little work timeline. If I stick to it I should be able to balance both projects now. Score.
As I go deeper with visual mediums, I can't but help to think that they have many advantage at presenting subtlety. You can hint characters traits or their values by showing subtle, different behaviors, either on the scene or in the background. So, how do you does the same with written medium such as novel? When you put a detail that have to be important later on (Chekhov;s Gun), surely reader will notice and that is for is not very subtle. Or is it? What do you think guys? Do you have your own opinion on subtlety in written fiction?
Sounds like you have it in hand then. Have you heard any more feedback from others on it?
Thanks! This is really helpful!
Fight through, brother!So, I'm making progress slowly but surely on my novel which I've posted a chapter or two in this thread waaaay back.
Fighting through all of my life stress and issues and trying to get this done is becoming a herculean task, at least it's roughly half done.
I just wish I could find it in myself to get over my fears and finish this.
Christ. I really want to write. I love it. I really do. Started writing like 4-5 years ago, when I was in college I think. OnMt problem is I get stuck with it, which is my problem to adress I know. Like some months I go on a writing spree, and then don't do anything for the same time.
Actually finished a 240,000 word novel last year, and have spent 12 months editing it. Still think it's not ready. Probably never will be. But its good to know others have the same dilemma.
You may learn more at this point by putting that manuscript on the back-burner and starting something new.one thing that's helped me write more isacknowledging that nearly all early novels an author produces are crap, and that ideas are cheap.
Oh trust me, this is my most recent idea, one that came after about a dozen ideas. It took me 6 months to write it all, which makes it like a year and a half old. I'm very proud of it. Beta readers fucking loved it, wanted more, encouraged me to publish/make a sequal. But I don't want to release anything unless I know it's as good as it can possibly be. No if ever I were to make an actual novel to be published. This would be it.
I do get what your saying though, realised it several years ago. Had this one story that I loved to bits, but I realised that it could never work. So I curtailed it. Sad day. =(
Well hello topic I never knew existed before but will visit daily...
Well hello topic I never knew existed before but will visit daily...
Reading this thread has made me afraid of ever showing my writing to another living soul.
To put it another way, I generally know bad writing when I see it, but I don't have any such sense regarding my own work. I write how I write, as best as I know how, but I think if I were to put it out there, only to discover it's so-bad-it's-awful... well, I don't want to do that. Not until I know it's worth something.
How do you know when your writing isn't shit?