outunderthestars
Banned
The only people who should feel cheated are the people who bought the PS4 to play their PS2-discs. I know I did.
joke post?
The only people who should feel cheated are the people who bought the PS4 to play their PS2-discs. I know I did.
The only people who should feel cheated are the people who bought the PS4 to play their PS2-discs. I know I did.
There is also no technical reason not to allow backwards compatibility with the so-called PS1/PS2 Classics from PS3 that are sold digitally in the PlayStation Store, as they are merely disc images (ISOs) with an emulation wrapper.
Yes there are ways to boot PS2 pirate copies and PS1 pirate copies just work (edit: with swap trick) afair.
joke post?
Forgive my ignorance but how would someone use the swap trick on the PS4?
Sony gonna Sony. No one should of guessed differentThere's no reason not to let us bring PS1 and PS2 Classics to PS4. People have spent a lot of money building up their libraries of those games on PS3 and Vita. Not letting people bring them to the most relevant Playstation platform is bullshit. Especially when there's no technical reason it can't happen. This is just another example of Sony focusing way too much on HD remasters this gen. They are obsessed.
I'm hoping a series of backlash will make Nintendo choose carefully how they handle Virtual Console/eShop with the NX. I seriously believe they are thinking of resetting everyone's accounts again, but if this did enough damage to Sony hopefully it could change their course.
I thought we had passed the point of "who cares what the internet says? lol!"Man Sony aint giving us full BC. Im sure dozens will be very upset but the majority of ppl dont give a flying fuck about playing old ass games tbh.
Nice... Apparently some people think you are seriousThe only people who should feel cheated are the people who bought the PS4 to play their PS2-discs. I know I did.
...PS4 read CDs?..
Anyway, I think that the main reason why they're unlikely to support disk based BC is because they'll have to emulate the copy protection routines of these consoles which were h/w based and can be rather tricky especially with a completely new BD drive. Security concerns are also possible that by breaching this emulation of copy protection on PS4 an attacker may actually breach PS4's copy protection as well which will be bad for them at this point of PS4's lifecycle.
Another concern is that all of the above would cost a lot more money than a standard PS4 PSN copy protection which is used for PS4 titles anyway - which may not be an investment they want to make as I personally think that amount of money they may get from selling PS1/PS2 classics on PS4 is not that much at all.
That's a bold statement. What makes you so sure about that?The good will this generates is worth more than however much is earned by making people re-purchase games.
Am I the only one that thinks even if all this were true it would tie into PS PLUS very nicely?
...PS4 read CDs?..
Security concerns are also possible that by breaching this emulation of copy protection on PS4 an attacker may actually breach PS4's copy protection as well which will be bad for them at this point of PS4's lifecycle.
There probably isn't but Sony wants $. That's all.
Yeah because that's what I want to do with my PS4 is to play PS2 games! Yeah!
...PS4 read CDs?..
Anyway, I think that the main reason why they're unlikely to support disk based BC is because they'll have to emulate the copy protection routines of these consoles which were h/w based and can be rather tricky especially with a completely new BD drive. Security concerns are also possible that by breaching this emulation of copy protection on PS4 an attacker may actually breach PS4's copy protection as well which will be bad for them at this point of PS4's lifecycle.
Another concern is that all of the above would cost a lot more money than a standard PS4 PSN copy protection which is used for PS4 titles anyway - which may not be an investment they want to make as I personally think that amount of money they may get from selling PS1/PS2 classics on PS4 is not that much at all.
taken from the official PS4 manual
![]()
You also have NO IDEA whether discs would be compatible with the emulator. Just because it can read these kinds of discs doesn't mean the PS2 emulator will use straight ROMs. You have no idea what kind of changes may have been made to allow remote play, share play, trophies, and more. You are getting SO UPSET over something that we don't know anything about. You are being reactionary.
You are always going to be charged money for a feature that cost to R&D and implement.
Yes, it even has the laser.
I'm rather surprised you think the copy protection for PS2 discs is more complicated and more expensive than blu-ray copy protection. PS2 copy protection is mostly just the same copy protection that's used for DVD movies (which the PS4 already has), and purposefully bad sectors, which is trivial for a drive firmware to ignore.
Security is a legit concern and about the only halfway decent argument I've seen in these threads, but it's also easily fixed with a whitelist of legitimate PS2 executable hashes.
Then disable those extra features (trophies, remote play, etc) when playing from a disc.
Somehow, Microsoft was able to write a 360 emulator that doesn't require people to rebuy all their games. Surely Sony should be able to do the same thing for a system that is a whole generation older.
Which is awful, because as consumers we are applauding this mediocre treatment of our digital content. Arrogant Sony is back.They don't need to bullshit us with goodwill anymore. They've won.
That just turns it into a pachinko machine.Put 007 Nightfire into your PS4 and enter the konami code.
I mean, there sort of is. There's no technical reason preventing 1:1 emulation, but Sony seems intent on upscaling the games they support. Anyone who's used a PS2 emulator knows that emulating a game above its original resolution isn't a one-size-fits-all situation. A lot of games require special settings to avoid graphical oddities, and some stuff just looks weird no matter what.
With that said, I do think it would be nice if they did allow full support for 1:1 emulation on disc games. But that'that's not the route they've decided to go.
Props to MS for somehow pulling that massive task together and making those licensing deals (which would be easier since 360 was only once generation behind). Does Xbone also support all original xbox games as well?
Especially in light of Microsoft offering backwards compatibility on the Xbox One for 360 games, Sony forcing people to re-buy 2 generation old games that they may already have copies of comes across as really shitty to me.
I say that as a someone who falls more in the Sony camp than the MS camp, and someone who has been that way since the days of the PS1, but stuff like this gets under my skin pretty good, and just seems like an obvious way to garner good will with your veteran player base. It's pretty disappointing that they chose to ignore those people completely, as opposed to doing the right thing.
Surely this is going to be related to licensing?
I'm actually more excited to play PS2 classics re-rendered to 1080p and with trophies added. I have a PS2 and PS3 that plays discs unaltered if I need that. There's several PS2 games I'd rather experience in an enhanced form.
It actually is harder the older the game is from a licensing perspective
Look how long it took them the get all the PS1 games when they started doing that. Hell and its not even a complete library with big games missing and different games per region
Ps2 has one of the largest libraries ever
You guys are oversimplifying things here
It actually is harder the older the game is from a licensing perspective
Look how long it took them the get all the PS1 games when they started doing that. Hell and its not even a complete library with big games missing and different games per region
Ps2 has one of the largest libraries ever
You guys are oversimplifying things here
It's really unfortunate to see how eager many are to accept this inferior emulation when we've had full PS1 disc support and cross-buy on multiple platforms for years. There's no real reason anyone should have expected less for the PS2 aside from lowered expectations, and adding a few measly incentives like trophies hardly takes the sting out of it.
Not to mention more effort being put into these rereleases means we'll likely be waiting even longer and receiving even fewer classics on the store than we were already.
I understand not all games will be supported, but if I have a copy of a PS2 game that is supported, then why not just let me play the copy I have. I'm not oversimplifying, I'm pointing out that in the cases when Sony could have let people who already own a game that is supported play that game, they've instead chosen to go the corporate route of making repurchasing it the only option.
The fact that people defend this sort of thing shows just how far down the rabbit hole we've gone when it comes to the corporate definition of content ownership.
Its likely 0% technical
70% Legal
30% We need the money
Props to MS for somehow pulling that massive task together and making those licensing deals (which would be easier since 360 was only once generation behind). Does Xbone also support all original xbox games as well?
Does the PC PS2 emulator run discs?
Imagine if they announced an updated PSX console for western markets with HDMI-out at PSX tomorrow, for all your PS1 and PS2 needs.Guys please PSX is tomorrow, let's save the outrage for then, when we actually get confirmation on how greedy Sony is