:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lolElectricBlue187 said:South Carolina. Columbia or Charleston?
Rentahamster said:One of the subjects of the article responds:
http://www.salon.com/life/pinched/2...d_stamp_response/index.html?source=newsletter
pel1300 said:you can easily buy healthy food without it being organic.
idiots.
Alucrid said:2.50 for those strawberries? Good price.
ssolitare said:And for the strawberries, did they go bad the next day? That's really cheap.
ATF487 said:It's ridiculous; Strawberries (when they aren't on sale) are 4 dollars around here. 1.25 a piece is amazing
Here's the thing, I'm all for people doing whatever they want in college, even if returns to money. HOWEVER, if you live in a country like the USA, where the cost of schooling for the most part is disgustingly higher than the rest of the world then it makes little to no sense to me to purely invest your time in a major which you know you will have an enormous debt coming out of and little to no job prospects. The least you could do is minor in something which you can make some money off of for the future.
You have to love articles like this which rile up the peons to hate on the peons, nice distraction. Meanwhile the people with real power committing REAL fraud involving taxpayer money on a level we can't even imagine laugh all the way to bank.
CharlieDigital said:I just got them today. They're usually good for a week; may have to throw out one or two by the end of the week.
Yah, the premise of my arguments in this thread are that if you know where to shop, fresh fruits and produce are cheap and affordable and better for you than junk food. If you only know how to shop at the chain market's, you're going to get screwed every time because they don't specialize in produce. The chains have to buy produce that will have a longer shelf life. A produce market can buy fruits and veggies closer to ripeness because they move more produce.
Zyzyxxz said:They do give you alot of produce but if you have a family of 4-5 it should be good enough. Its normally $20 a week I think?
CharlieDigital said:Yah, the premise of my arguments in this thread are that if you know where to shop, fresh fruits and produce are cheap and affordable and better for you than junk food. If you only know how to shop at the chain market's, you're going to get screwed every time because they don't specialize in produce. The chains have to buy produce that will have a longer shelf life. A produce market can buy fruits and veggies closer to ripeness because they move more produce.
ATF487 said:Yeah, it's just that a lot of us don't live close enough to cities/large communities that have stores like that.
Rentahamster said:One of the subjects of the article responds:
http://www.salon.com/life/pinched/2...d_stamp_response/index.html?source=newsletter
i stopped reading hereGrotesqueBeauty said:I love how people just assume all technique is the result of osmosis in the arts. As if having access to the right teachers, facilities, and community is meaningless. Even putting that aside, artists rely on networking for their livelihood even more than most other professions, and a college full of like minded individuals is an ideal place to lay foundations that can last a lifetime.
Mr. Spinnington said:i stopped reading here
Do they have these in the SGV?Zyzyxxz said:Also one should consider a CSA (community supported agriculture) box if can. Helping out local famers and buying locally grown produce is the best way to go green instead of shopping organic at places like Whole Foods where quality may be very good but prices are high and many times the vegetables may come from Mexico and not within the United States.
They do give you alot of produce but if you have a family of 4-5 it should be good enough. Its normally $20 a week I think?
agreed. these jerkoffs generally make the choice to live in a hippie community where jobs are hard to find and they've forsaken automobiles as a method of transportation so they can't commute to work. everyone has apparently been to college in this article-- what's stopping them from getting at least a part-time job someplace?EvaPlusMinus said:Give to the needy!
CharlieDigital said:Total: $23.04
ATF487 said:It's ridiculous; Strawberries (when they aren't on sale) are 4 dollars around here. 1.25 a piece is amazing
Mr. Spinnington said:agreed. these jerkoffs generally make the choice to live in a hippie community where jobs are hard to find and they've forsaken automobiles as a method of transportation so they can't commute to work. everyone has apparently been to college in this article-- what's stopping them from getting at least a part-time job someplace?
evil solrac v3.0 said:hi, recession. it hasn't ended. still going!
numble said:Do they have these in the SGV?
Freshmaker said:They do to a point. You can't get any hot meal from the deli etc.
prove itUltimaPooh said:Not to bring you down from your support local business thing...
But all of that stuff you listed is available at Wal-mart for cheaper.
They even have the same brand of strawberries.
DownLikeBCPowder said:Was trying to read through this thread but this really got me.
Really? They do "to a point"? You can't get hot food from the deli? Man, that's really terrible, but I don't think they'd want any because they're too busy loading up on Snickers and Pepsi. I see this shit every day.
I don't believe in the Food Stamp program, but if they are going to have this program they (the government, the stewards of our money) needs to create hard and fast rules for compliance - no bullshit "food". No doritos, no ice cream. REAL food only.
And for god's sake they should not allow food stamps to be used at convenience stores.
UltimaPooh said:Technically we're out of a recession because we have growth (very modest growth) it just feels like we're in a recession cuz none of us have jobs.
cwmartin said:There's a lag associated with the growth that we're seeing in output in the economy, and the translation of that growth into significant job creation and raises of current wages/salaries. Most leading economic indicators show its'a comin, hang in there guys. A lot of us are in similar rowboats out there.
WanderingWind said:Okay, I'll bite. Why?
DownLikeBCPowder said:Well, for starters the aforementioned reason. If we absolutely must have a program in which we distribute wealth to the "unable", surely we should actually regulate and enforce standards upon it. Perhaps require them to buy real food and not processed shit and sugar? I'm all for buying snickers and ice cream with your dollars, but not with tax dollars.
The fact that convenience stores can even accept these cards when they may only have 10 or so items that should even qualify is an apparent flag for this scam of a program.
Universities encourage students to enroll in food stamp program
About 20,000 people sign up for food stamps every day, and college students across the country are the newest demographic being encouraged to enlist.
Portland State University devotes a page on its Web site to explaining the ease with which students can receive benefits, along with instructions on how to apply. The school says food stamps are not charity but rather a benefit all honest taxpaying citizens can afford. The U.S. Department of Agriculture renamed food stamps the Supplemental Nutrition and Assistance Program (SNAP) in 2008, instituted electronic debit cards instead of coupons, and began an aggressive push to expand eligibility. This is from the schools site:
Here are some additional SNAP facts:
Over half of all U.S. citizens will use SNAP at least once during their lifetime.
SNAP is not a charity. As a taxpayer, you are paying into this program and, when needed, you can reap the benefits.
There are enough SNAP dollars for everyone that needs them. As a matter of fact, about 20 percent of Oregonians who are eligible for SNAP do not apply.
Students receiving SNAP can defer their student loans while they are receiving benefits.
Applying for SNAP is easy. In most cases, you will not have to apply more than once a year.
Traditionally food stamps are for the working poor and single parents, but colleges are trying to make it as easy as possible for students to obtain federal assistance, no matter their socio-economic background.
Oregon has a state-wide non-profit which includes a special focus on food stamps for students:
Being a college student is hard work! Not just academically, but financially too. Many students are surprised to learn they may be eligible for SNAP (food stamps). Students who meet income guidelines may qualify if they meet at least one of the following criteria:
Full-time student who works at least 20 hours per week.
Full-time single student who is caring for children younger than the age of 12.
Full-time married student who is caring for children younger than the age of 6.
At least a half-time student who is actively working any hours in a work-study program.
Note: federal financial aid including Pell grants, Perkins loans, Stafford loans and most work-study is not counted as income against student eligibility.
In addition, the school notes that the federal government is working to eliminate the stigma associated with taking the government coupons to the checkout line:
Your EBT card looks and works like a debit card. You swipe it as you would a debit card, select EBT as the payment method, and enter the pin # that was assigned to you. No one except the cashier will know that it is an EBT card.
The Grand Views, a college newspaper from Grand View University in Des Moines, Iowa, featured a story on students who apply for food stamps because they claim they dont have time to hold down a job between classes and basketball practices. The paper wrote:
Once you show up, you sign in on a computer, answer a few questions and then they tell you if you qualify. Its pretty simple.
Massachusetts has several state-wide nonprofits that specifically help college students get food stamps. The Web site details the caveats associated with eligibility:
Q4: Can I get benefits if I still live with my parents?
If you are 22 or older, and if you buy and prepare more than half your meals separately from your parents, you can still apply for SNAP/Food Stamps for yourself.
Adam Sylvain, a sophomore at Virginias George Mason University, recounted a recent conversation with friends in his dorm room. My roommate told me he applied for food stamps, and they told him he qualified for $200 a month in benefits, Sylvain said. Hes here on scholarship and he saves over $5,000 each summer in cash.
A few of our other friends who were in the room also said if there were able to, they would get food stamps They think that if theyre eligible its the governments fault, so they might as well, Sylvain said.
Students at GMU can buy a meal plan for $1,275 that provides 10 meals a week for the semester thats $71 a week.
As previously reported by The Daily Caller, The USDA is pushing to regional SNAP offices to ease eligibility requirements and forgo checking peoples financial situations before providing benefits. President Obamas latest budget included $72.5 billion for food stamps nearly double the amount from 2008. Approximately 38 million people, or 13 percent of the U.S. population is on food stamps.
Its a trend that seems on the rise Salon recently reported on young, broke hipsters using federal assistance to buy high-end organic food.
Im sort of a foodie, and Im not going to do the living off ramen thing, one young man said, fondly remembering a recent meal hed prepared of roasted rabbit with butter, tarragon and sweet potatoes. I used to think that you could only get processed food and government cheese on food stamps, but its great that you can get anything.
The USDAs Food and Nutrition Service did not respond to request for comment.
WanderingWind said:Hm. Several problems with that I can see right off the top of my head.
Convenience stores might be the only place to get milk, cereal or baby foods within a reasonable distance in many urban areas. I lived in Atlanta, and if I needed to go grocery shopping, it would have been about a 30 minute drive (hours if by bus). Not so bad, unless of course, you're trying to pick up stuff for a hungry, screaming baby. Not allowing WIC/Food Stamps at convenience stores is way too arbitrary.
Secondly, your quotation marks on unable indicates you don't believe some people are on food stamps because they have no other choice. If this is a poor assumption on my part, I apologize. If this is what you believe, then I don't think I'll be discussing this with you any further. Especially when talking about a time with such high unemployment.
Lastly, I'm never a fan of too many regulations governing assistance for the poor. Of course, we can agree things like alcohol and cigarettes are obviously uneligable, but when talking about foods, where is the line? Nothing prepackaged? Nothing with a sodium content above X percent? Nothing organic? No red meats?
Not to mention, as much as I personally dislike processed foods - that's largely a personal bias. I mean, especially since we all have health insurance now, why the hell does it matter what they eat - as long as it is within their allotted budget?
Not to mention, as much as I personally dislike processed foods - that's largely a personal bias. I mean, especially since we all have health insurance now, why the hell does it matter what they eat - as long as it is within their allotted budget?
Ripclawe said:It begins...
If taxpayers who are the producing in this country are forced to pay for someone else's health care and food stamps which means eating healthy would cut down on health related issues then yeah we should have restrictions because taxpayers shouldn't have to indulge in peoples poor health habits.
The "its free" mentality is there reason a sizable portion of this country thinks everything is a right and they are entitled to it
DownLikeBCPowder said:There would be no problem to allow them at CStores if the purchases made reflected your idealized opinions on the matter. However, they don't. In a CStore combined with EBT, Snickers, Pepsi, Coke, Doritos, Little Debbies, Lance Crackers, and Poptarts run the show.
DownLikeBCPowder said:You are correct, I do believe -some- people are on this program by choice and not of necessity. I think it would be absurd to believe otherwise. You believe that everyone who uses this program is in need of the program? I find that to be unreasonable, unless I'm misunderstanding your implications.
DownLikeBCPowder said:There is no need to extend this to mean excessive regulation. By no means have I implicated the desire for that, rather a moderate and reasonable level of regulation on the distribution of public funds. I understand that regulations can only go so far before they choke out what is being regulated, however do you believe it is unreasonable to wish for a bit heavier regulation on what can be purchased with the program? Milk, eggs, base goods like vegetables, fruits. Base materials, sugar, flour, etc. Non prepared foods, essentially. I do not have issue with grey area foods, but I believe there is a line which is crossed when it comes to candy and food which can only be considered as purely snack food (dorito, lays, ice cream).
DownLikeBCPowder said:Really? I mean... really?
Thank god we exist by the grace of government for now they provide us with food and if our health ails from the purchase of said food, the aforementioned government will provide us with health care. If we lack the means to arrive at the destination, fear not, the government shall provideth for us.
Ripclawe said:It begins...
If taxpayers who are the producing in this country are forced to pay for someone else's health care and food stamps which means eating healthy would cut down on health related issues then yeah we should have restrictions because taxpayers shouldn't have to indulge in peoples poor health habits.
The "its free" mentality is the reason a sizable portion of this country thinks everything is a right and they are entitled to it
Right. Based on that exact same logic, since we all pay taxes, fat people should be put on government mandated diets, because now we all shoulder the burden of their decision to survive off of Krispy Kreme burgers and lard shakes.
Ripclawe said:We penalize people for smoking and if the government is now going to foot medical bills with taxpayers money, why not have people who are obese put on diets or face higher premiums?
Am I the only person who honestly doesn't see a problem with this? College is fucking expensive in this country, so if we can't save as much money on tuition as people in other countries, maybe we can save money on stuff like food instead.Ripclawe said:The next generation of entitled dipshits begins!
http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/27/universities-encourage-students-to-enroll-in-food-stamp-program/
GaimeGuy said:Am I the only person who honestly doesn't see a problem with this? College is fucking expensive in this country, so if we can't save as much money on tuition as people in other countries, maybe we can save money on stuff like food instead.
Even if you're "saving $5000 a year" through a scholarship, you're still paying a fuckton. I'm fortunate enough to have a family that saved up money for me to go to college, so I don't have to worry about student loans for the next 20 years. I can't say the same thing for most college students.
And if you get $200 in food stamps, it shouldn't matter if you want to spend that on PB&J or on organic salmon. You get X amount of dollars for food.
WanderingWind said:...because that's out and out fascism. I say this as a healthy adult male who runs 20 hours a week, btw. I'm not a fatty, myself. Though some of my best friends....
You can't possibly think being forced to go on a diet by government officials is anything but a horrible idea.
Am I the only person who honestly doesn't see a problem with this? College is fucking expensive in this country, so if we can't save as much money on tuition as people in other countries, maybe we can save money on stuff like food instead.