davepoobond
you can't put a price on sparks
curses are so last gen
next gen is "looming threat of cell phones"
next gen is "looming threat of cell phones"
My money is on CLOUD (services) vs Local Hardware (Oculus Rift and unknown friends.)next gen is "looming threat of cell phones"
curses are so last gen
next gen is "looming threat of cell phones"
NES-SuperNES-N64 = Yes
PS-PS2-PS3 = Yes
Xbox-360-One = Yes?
GC-Wii-Wii U = Yes?
Probably true.
The Dreamcast probably would've if they had been a bit more forward thinking and had deeper pockets. As Sony seems to be doing both AND is coming off a successful enough system they probably will shatter it. Though I imagine if Microsoft were a lot smarter here it really could've been their GC instead.4th console is where it's at compared to the 3rd:
Sega -> Dreamcast - became 3rd party
Nintendo -> Gamecube - sold terribly
I hope the PS4 breaks the cycle.
Lost a lot of third party support, lost the top spot completely. It's basically the origin of the "you buy Nintendo hardware for Nintendo games!" mentality, because not only was the third party support lacking but their titles were among the finest and best remembered of the generation... even if most 3rd party games were rubbish.How was the Nintendo 64 a failure??
How was the Nintendo 64 a failure??
NES-SuperNES-N64 = Yes
PS-PS2-PS3 = Yes
Xbox-360-One = Yes?
GC-Wii-Wii U = Yes?
Probably true.
The console curses are about marketplace success, not whether YOU like them or not. Otherwise I'd be saying it's completely untrue and the Saturn/PS3 are amazing consoles I enjoyed a lot. Doesn't mean the Saturn didn't fuck up completely in the US and the PS3 didn't get off to a terrible start.Nintendo hit an all-time low with their 5th console.
Drive Club is not a Simulator, im pretty sure the devs came out and said as much.
As much as it seems like it right now you can't add that one in there. It isn't a third console.
NES - SNES - N64 - GC - Wii- Wii U
PS - PS2 - PS3
Xbox - Xbox360 - Xbone
The N64 was also outsold by the Saturn in Japan. It was pretty dismal for Nintendo.Lost nearly all of 3rd party support and completely obliterated by a competitor? Nintendo consoles sold the most for 2 generations straight and then boom, N64S1 1:3.
okay, name me a good 3rd console that didn't have a big mess surrounding it, i'm curious
Obviously there is no actual curse, but there has been a high frequency of companies failing [comparatively] on their 3rd console releases.
Sega -> Saturn
Nintendo -> 64
Sony -> PS3
If MS "fails" with the One, it's safe to say that it's a reoccurring theme.
So what is this Curse?
NES ~ 61.91 million , SNES ~ 49.10 million , N64 32.93 million just a steady decline as the competition got tougher & the 4th console the Gamecube sold ~ 21.74 million continuing the Nintendo decline.
Master System ~ 1013 million , Genesis ~ 40 million , Saturn ~ 9.5 million curse of what? not being the Genesis? because every other Sega console sold around the 10 million mark even Dreamcast ~ 10.6 million
PS1 ~ 102.49 million , PS2 ~ 155 million , PS3 ~ 80 million & going it's going to end up right around the same numbers as the PS1.
Everyone forgets about the SG-1000. Genesis was Sega 's 3rd NOT Saturn.
I would hardly consider PS3 a failure unless you are comparing it to PS1 and 2 sales. It did fine this gen, but Sony worked extra hard to turn it around imo. Sony put forth a hell of an effort with PS3 all the way until the end, unlike MS and Ninty this gen.
As noted it did worse than PS1 and PS2, and for that purpose it fits: if we look only at US released consoles Sega rose to be relevant next to Nintendo (and still faltered) only to fall to a distant global third place, and the N64 did well globally but not anywhere near Sony's level. So, yeah, a lot of it has to do with relativity, as otherwise I THINK the PS3 outsold the NES and SNES anyway.Not really seeing where the PS3 has failed. Dodgy start mind, but it is at least as successful as the 360.
I don't think I'd count something you can't even stick other media into. Otherwise we branch off into Game & Watch and that Duck Hunt project thing.& the Nintendo Color TV Game
there is no curse. it's just poor decisions and in an industry where there are usually only three players max... well, there's always going to be two losers.
Well, this is half true: curse is convenient shorthand for a pattern commonly observed, and as I stated I suspect it's really more a rise followed by either hubris or at least a notion you can keep doing the same thing (or just do ANYTHING) and still have the same success. In the case of Nintendo it seems usually "stick with what we do" blowing up in their faces as cartridges undermined the N64 and "quirky gimmick with underpowered console" worked amazing for Wii but not Wii U. Meanwhile Sony and Microsoft seem to have operated under the mentality of "we can do whatever the fuck we want now," and it blew up in Sony's face and has to some extent in Microsoft's, we won't know HOW deeply until the systems have been out a few months.there is no curse. it's just poor decisions and in an industry where there are usually only three players max... well, there's always going to be two losers.
True, Microsoft forced themselves in, they definitely wouldn't be around still if they didn't have the resources, and they may yet have fallen out anyway if they didn't have the keen sense to understand the industry ENOUGH to carve out a stable niche to grow from. If they had no sense there and just went "We made a console, play it" it probably would've been the Kin.That's becausr Microsoft isn't even supposed to be in this industry. No other companies could have taken the atrocious losses they were taking in their first eight years and continue plodding on.
NES-SuperNES-N64 = Yes
PS-PS2-PS3 = Yes
Xbox-360-One = Yes?
GC-Wii-Wii U = Yes?
Probably true.
How was the Nintendo 64 a failure??
That's becausr Microsoft isn't even supposed to be in this industry. No other companies could have taken the atrocious losses they were taking in their first eight years and continue plodding on.
I am kinda interested to see how Killzone does as a launch title with a Christmas time release, with no major competitors other than Call of Duty.
And honestly, even without the shareholder angle it's kind of what makes sense period. It's not a vital part of their business, their plan was to force themselves in yet they only got a tepid return, if they can't actually follow through on their stated goals getting in the console business then WHY stick around?Thats probably the reason why the Xbox One is designed the way it is with all the shit policies. Its done to turn as much profit as they can squeeze from it to appease the shareholders.
Lets face it, the xbox brand has never been a favourite child from the MS family with the shareholders. Its quite well known that after the RROD fiasco, they were told to return money to the shareholders or else.
Thats why I think if MS gets off to a sluggish start and doesn't recover fast, it will be cast aside. MS shareholders are not known for mercy
Ever heard of Nintendo 64DD? Now you have and you can never forget it no matter how much Nintendo wants you to forget it. That list of proposed games is a mindfuck.
Nintendo 64 didn't even do that badly and delivered some of the greatest games ever made.
Nintendo 64 didn't even do that badly and delivered some of the greatest games ever made.
Yes because curses actually exist.
Not really seeing where the PS3 has failed. Dodgy start mind, but it is at least as successful as the 360.
Wait...are there some people in this thread who seriously believe that people are using "Curse" in the literal every day "magical" sense?
Da fuq?!
There is absolutely no way Sony will fail at all with the PlayStation 4.
It really is the return of the King. I expect sales somewhere in between PlayStation and PlayStation 2. Many Xbox 360 players are making the switch to PlayStation 4.
NES-SuperNES-N64 = Yes
PS-PS2-PS3 = Yes
Xbox-360-One = Yes?
GC-Wii-Wii U = Yes?
Probably true.