TheGreyHulk
Member
Traded in killzone and ghosts so I now have $68 credit. Free titanfall! Yay!
Game looks awesome
Game looks awesome
You don't see how, for example, killstreaks are designed more to enthrall the player than to contribute to balanced, competitive gameplay?
CounterStrike relies on similar performance awards but the design there properly rewards teamwork rather than individual achievement. It also avoids that layer of randomness that ruins any semblance of competition; a team getting AWPs first is tough but it isn't being randomly bombed or tripping over a deathstreak grenade out of nowhere. And spending on an AWP can cost you for decking yourself out with other gear, especially if you go for it early, get killed, and congrats, the other team grabbed your expensive weapon.
MMOs largely aren't pay by the month anymore. Even WoW, which still is, desperately wants people at endgame and literally gives you leveled characters. Camping monsters, low drop rates, all things of the past; mainly you hit endgame, learn the new content as it comes out, get what you need quickly and move on to the next thing. They get their money from you simply playing as much as CoD does, at this point.
I could talk at leeeeength about how little those mechanics I described have to do with good RPGs, but that is too off-topic for this thread. I'll just say "Ultima" and leave it at that.
Multiplayer gaming is so much bigger than traditional SP campaigns these days.
Dudebro.gif
I believe that Titanfall is definitely for the fast paced competitive shooter crowd. It's has all the bells and whistles of a next gen FPS that COD created but evolved in the right way. I don't know about it being a system seller yet. Since such a small dedicated crowd knows about it, I'm curious to see how it does when the general public gets a taste of it. As of right now tho, I find Destiny to be more ambitious. It's just a larger scale game that if has a big crowd can become a huge platform to build off of. However I do feel like Destiny has a LOT of competition for game competing in that same genre. Skyrim online is pretty huge and can make a dent in Destiny popularity if executed correctly.
Forgive me if a similar thread may have been created recently, but I wanted to get a few things off my chest. Titanfall is a game that's been making a lot of noise as of late, with multiple E3 awards and all manner of praise from gaming publications. I just don't see the real reason for the unanimous praise and enthusiasm for this title.
Why is everybody so excited about it?
Well they said this awhile back, so it's not looking good.
'On the face of it, there seems to be an obvious answer to the problem of winning round fans of single player - allow the multiplayer-averse to fight their way through the entire campaign against the AI alone. According to Heppe, however, this isn't on the cards for the moment. "We don't have that in right now, but whether that's something the design team adds later on? I don't know. There's other modes in the game, but we're still in development."'
http://www.oxm.co.uk/63353/features...only-battles-and-winning-over-casual-players/
Might have something to do with the fact that it looks incredibly fun.
Graphics aren't everything.
The game has great animation, for the Pilots and especially the Titans.
Isn't the opposite also true about the hype. People bring up titanfall in any conversation to explain why xb1 is going to surpass the sales of ps4 upon its release. Basically people are hyping it and downplaying it on both sides because its xb1's killer app.
Can't wait to play some good ol' couch co-op with my bud- oh.
Those titan animations are top tier, i loved looking at how they lumbered around as well as being surprisingly mobile and limber.
Why do these threads keep getting made every week?
Is there a problem with a game getting hype?
Kinda, mostly because it's really not that new. It's a refinement, not a revelation, yet people are treating it like it's revolutionary.It's ok not to be excited about something, but is it that hard to see why a fast paced multiplayer shooter with jet packs and mechs has people interested?
Kinda, mostly because it's really not that new. It's a refinement, not a revelation, yet people are treating it like it's revolutionary.
"Revolutionary" is such an arbitrary adjective to ascribe to a game.Kinda, mostly because it's really not that new. It's a refinement, not a revelation, yet people are treating it like it's revolutionary.
I feel this thread is kind of endemic of most active GAF posters starting with console gaming in the SNES or PS1 era and associating either old Nintendo or cinematic, story heavy singleplayer games as the prime example of what gaming is, and then not getting that people who do multiplayer gaming first might be very excited for something that looks like it tries to blend popular multiplayer shooter trends from gen 5-6 and gen 7 together in a way they feel looks engaging.
Like I don't see any threads ever asking "Why is The Order 1886 exciting people? It's a linear cinematic corridor shooter." because we just gave GOTY to TLOU. Similarly, people getting confused about how a character from a game that has 27 million daily players beat Link, a character from a series that never even remotely approached 27 million units sold, because it's a multiplayer PC game that's notably more popular outside the US and Japan ("the gaming countries") than within them.
I guarantee most of the hate on the hype is because it's not coming out on PS4. Lol console wars.
Every impression I have heard from players is pretty damn positive. It unlikely that all of those are false hype.
It definitely has to be part of it, because most people choose to ignore games they aren't interested in or ones that don't appeal to them. But for some reason, with Titanfall, people jump at every opportunity to display their displeasure with something about the game.That's absolutely it. You don't see these kinds of threads about Watch Dogs or The Division, even though those games both have (or had) massive hype.
I feel this thread is kind of endemic of most active GAF posters starting with console gaming in the SNES or PS1 era and associating either old Nintendo or cinematic, story heavy singleplayer games as the prime example of what gaming is, and then not getting that people who do multiplayer gaming first might be very excited for something that looks like it tries to blend popular multiplayer shooter trends from gen 5-6 and gen 7 together in a way they feel looks engaging.
Like I don't see any threads ever asking "Why is The Order 1886 exciting people? It's a linear cinematic corridor shooter." because we just gave GOTY to TLOU. Similarly, people getting confused about how a character from a game that has 27 million daily players beat Link, a character from a series that never even remotely approached 27 million units sold, because it's a multiplayer PC game that's notably more popular outside the US and Japan ("the gaming countries") than within them.
Graphically, it's among the ugliest, most washed out brown games of the new generation,
The game has great animation, for the Pilots and especially the Titans.
I literally couldn't believe you were talking about Titanfall when I read this.
That's absolutely it. You don't see these kinds of threads about Watch Dogs or The Division, even though those games both have (or had) massive hype.
Titanfall (based solely on the alpha footage) is just call of duty with large robots that don't really seem to do anything. To destroy them all you apparently do is jump on the back and hit X, and all you do inside of them is shoot like crazy just like you would normally do on the ground. Kind of baffles me why this game is so hyped.
All you do in Super Mario Bros. is run to the right and jump. Kind of baffles me why some people call it the best game ever made.