Father_Brain said:
Continue cues of idiotic Icecream jokes, and saying only sick fucks who like loli would be affected.
And people wonder how they get this shit passed continually. :lol
Father_Brain said:
Seep said:Who'd want to watch/play anything that has minors being sexually/physically abused in the first place? Bunch of fucking weird bastards.
Father_Brain said:Hopefully, this Sankaku Complex site is completely wrong and Reuters has the story right...
The bill calls on the industry to regulate itself and prevent people under the age of 18 from buying or gaining access to both manga and animation, known as anime, containing material the government deems "unhealthy."
shintoki said:Continue cues of idiotic Icecream jokes, and sicks loli fucks who would only be effected.
Fuck the children, I wan't my immoral loli 360 games.shintoki said:To be fair, when does this not work. It's no different than dozens of retarded laws we have here that are always under the context of, "Please think of the children!". When many of them are just a farce to give up rights
V_Arnold said:If someone is sick and enjoys porn (not to mention he gets his sexual kicks out of it) that contains sexual intercourse with a younger boy/girl, not to mention underaged AND family relations, well, then that somebody needs treatment.
What Japan did with this is that they basically created a market to get money from these sick minds, and not treated this as an abnormal thing. Hopefully that will change. There is nothing artistic about buying that type of porn, because obviously, they are sexual tools, and the minute somebody acts based upon these, and believes that it is okay to do it, it becomes bad. There is no need for that. Imho.
Castor Krieg said:I don't see how manga publishers can protest. Gangbang loli insemination for everyone? I don't even think most below-18 Otaku are into this, my guess is loli is popular with 30,40-something crowd.
aHA!Wazzim said:Fuck the children
Bill 156 would require the industry to also regulate "manga, anime, and other images (except for real-life photography)" that "unjustifiably glorify or exaggerate" certain sexual or pseudo sexual acts. Another section of the revised bill would allow the government to directly regulate the above images if the depicted acts are also "considered to be excessively disrupting of social order" such as rape.
Extollere said:Currently there is no rating system in Japan for video games
V_Arnold said:There is nothing artistic about buying that type of porn, because obviously, they are sexual tools, and the minute somebody acts based upon these, and believes that it is okay to do it, it becomes bad. There is no need for that. Imho.
2San said:Here's the story from ANN:http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2010-12-15/full-tokyo-assembly-passes-youth-ordinance-bill
So what's excessively disruptive? In hindsight it doesn't seem so bad, I wasn't really familiar with Sankaku Complex's credibility.
So the Persona's in this world are safe right?
passed?considered to be excessively disrupting of social order
Peff said:Well, we won't likely see HD Mara anymore, if you can live with that...
It's not that. The people who are blindly saying it is a good thing, are the same idiots who promoted shit like the Patriot Act or Shit like the current net neutrality. And the thing is, it's just that. They are Mrs Lovejoy from Simpsoms. A complete idiot being swayed by the small extrema to forfeit rights over. They aren't even reading what they are signing for. :lolRSLAEV said:Yeah man, go ahead and pass the bill. I mean it only affects people I disapprove of, fuck em.
shintoki said:This is also by the same party that seems to be homophobic, probably racist, and wants to roll back liberal policies. Sounds very familiar for some reason.
ymmv said:So have there have been any Japanese console games sold in the west that would have been affected by this new law?
Not really. Depictions of homosexuality fall under immoral in the case of this law. That sounds pretty discriminatory.SonicMegaDrive said:Awesome news.
Extollere said:No. That is absolutely wrong. Disagree with it if you like, and I won't defend the content either, but that is wrong. Countries with access to pornography (and/or virtual child porn), have less sex crime than countries that do not. There is also no evidence that viewing of any kind of pornography leads to criminal behavior. There is no need to restrict that materials that one wishes to view as long as they violate no one else's human rights.
Effect said:What about that Catherine game?
Effect said:What about that Catherine game?
Wazzim said:Yeah.
It's a stupid law in desperation of making Japan seem more "normal" to the western public, the politici over there are total nutheads thinking this would work.
shintoki said:It's clearly more than just a loli ban, because it's allowing the government to dictate what material is offensive and what isn't. This is also by the same party that seems to be homophobic, probably racist, and wants to roll back liberal policies. I really don't mind a ban on loli materials, but having a small cabinet of age old men dictate what is "Socially acceptable" for youth to read doesn't sit well.
ULTROS! said:Catherine doesn't have minors AFAIK. They're all adults.
And I don't see minors being used wrongly in Atlus games.
OuterWorldVoice said:But we can all agree that the portrayal of rape, child pornography and incest for entertainment and sexual titillation are BAD right?
Yukiko, Rise, and Kanji's tracts in Persona 4 could probably be considered "promoting immoral sexual activity among minors" if someone wanted to pursue it. And that's the problem with this, the language is so vague that anything that so much as implies that high schoolers have libidos could be twisted as being in violation.ymmv said:So have there have been any Japanese console games sold in the west that would have been affected by this new law?
OuterWorldVoice said:OK imaginary First Ammendment of Japan spporters...
But we can all agree that the portrayal of rape, child pornography and incest for entertainment and sexual titillation are BAD right?
(also, Slippery Slope is a logical fallacy, not a phenomenon)
This however, is much less clear cut. I don't know what this is referring to, exactly. I would need some examples of them moving against something citing this clause.shintoki said:"promoting illegal or immoral sexual activity"
shintoki said:"promoting illegal or immoral sexual activity"
Doesn't say anything about minors. Started out as minors, now moved into that. Even though it is a logical fallacy, this is the slippery slope in action.
The bill appears to say that if you photograph this, it is okay (ignoring for a moment that other laws that say child pornography is wrong), but if you draw cartoon characters doing this, it's wrong.V_Arnold said:So basically you just generalized porn, and likened normal, adult porn to one where a 17-50 year old male fucks a 3-14 year old girl, or where that girl is even a relative to the boy, according to the story. Is that right?
JustAnotherOtaku said:My Japanese 360 collection has just increased in value tenfold. My anime collection could probably now land me in jail.
?Reuters said:"extreme sexual acts" including rape, incest and child sex
2San said:Here's the story from ANN:http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2010-12-15/full-tokyo-assembly-passes-youth-ordinance-bill
So what's excessively disruptive? In hindsight it doesn't seem so bad, I wasn't really familiar with Sankaku Complex's credibility.
So the Persona's in this world are safe right?
Haunted said:Does any of it depict ?
Because that's what this seems to be targeting.
OuterWorldVoice said:OK imaginary First Ammendment of Japan spporters...
But we can all agree that the portrayal of rape, child pornography and incest for entertainment and sexual titillation are BAD right?
(also, Slippery Slope is a logical fallacy, not a phenomenon)
Technically, I guess so.Kusagari said:Couldn't this technically cover anything that has rape featured at all even if it's displayed in a proper manner and not made light of?
But it seems they are aware of it.In a nod to criticism about freedom of speech, the legislation includes a clause that the assembly will consider "artistic and social expression" in considering what material will be restricted.
out0v0rder said:when the americans banned alchohol..........well you know the story.
give me my manga depression revolution!
Effect said:What about that Catherine game?