• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Trump thanks black people that did not vote

Status
Not open for further replies.
https://twitter.com/MrAlexisPereira/status/796224423233785857
kY3twgz.png

I thought only 40% of white women voted for Trump.
 
No one truly deserves Trump.

Oh i disagree. Sometimes people get exactly what their complacency or fucked up principles earned them.

And maybe in the future they wont be so fucking incompetent after the hard lesson is learned. Gotta force feed some delusional people.
 
Operation Blame the Darkies is in full swing. Blacks were the front line of defense as per usual. The numbers were there. In particular black women put in the work. This scapegoating bs is not just sad, it was completely predictable.

Especially the bolded. Black women were the only demographic for Hillary that did exactly what they were "supposed" to do for a Hillary win. Otherwise, there is equal blame to throw around for every US demographic in regards to Hillary voters, but with suppressed voter turn out in states like North Carolina, I'd point more blame at Republicans.
 
I'm going off number of votes cast, not your percentages.



I never said it would, I'm just tired of people saying that this is what most of America wanted. It isn't. I'm not even American and it's mad annoying.

65.7 million votes for Clinton out of 136.7 million cast isn'r a majority under any definition. It's a plurality.
 
Hee. He's not doing anything that so many so-called-liberals aren't doing right now, and what white America has done for centuries. Throwing any blame that can be mustered at the blacks to reignite that old status quo, and shift the blame to adjacent targets. Never mind the show of numbers that came to oppose him. Nope. It wasn't white Americans that didn't show up and to keep fascism in check. It's always anyone and everyone else.
Same people that aren't going to do a damned thing about the militarization of the police forces across the country, or lift a finger to preserve the national reserves.

100 % when it doubt blames minorities and poor people.
 

Cute, but:

1. Was from a lens of solely Clinton v Trump, because realistically independent votes are throwaways since they never stand a chance in your garbage two-party system.
2. She still got more votes than he did, I don't really care beyond that. I stand by what I ultimately meant - Trump isn't what the majority of American voters wanted by any means. ^^;
3. If you read, you'd notice that what you've said has already been said, and they've gone ignored because...

This thread has to do with Trump using Black non-voters as a claim to victory when in reality it's degenerates who vote party or bust that won this for him. That, and white or white passing individuals and their, "LOL, I got mine," mentalities.

Do you have anything to add to that, or are you staying stuck on that she didn't get the definition majority of votes because people think she's so crooked they voted indie when they couldn't stomach Trump?
 
The great depression was worse than 9/11 by a long shot. Those that voted for Trump are already in dire economic conditions. If that doesn't change under him, even they may see the light.
I agree

But the point I'm making is that there was a clear enemy to portray that Americans could focus on. For peral harbor it was the Japanese for 9/11 it was al-qaeda (some blame the entire religion). Those who had nothing to do with it were still blamed for it.

Did the great depression have such a thing?
 
I agree

But the point I'm making is that there was a clear enemy to portray that Americans could focus on. For peral harbor was the Japanese for 9/11 is was al-qaeda (some blame the entire religion). Those who had nothing to do with it were still blamed for it.

Did the great depression have such a thing?

yes, it did. In fact, there was a horrendous targeting of Mexicans from 1929 to 1936 that forcibly repatriated up to 2 million Mexicans with no due process - most actual US citizens or legal residents - whom some Americans blamed for the Depression. In 2005 California formally apologized for this behavior.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Repatriation

Sounds familiar, dont it?
 
Do you have anything to add to that, or are you staying stuck on that she didn't get the definition majority of votes because people think she's so crooked they voted indie when they couldn't stomach Trump?

I absolutely am. People intentionally misusing and twisting language to suit their agendas is a pet peeve of mine and mixing up majority and plurality infuriates me.
 
I agree

But the point I'm making is that there was a clear enemy to portray that Americans could focus on. For peral harbor was the Japanese for 9/11 is was al-qaeda (some blame the entire religion). Those who had nothing to do with it were still blamed for it.

Did the great depression have such a thing?

They had Herbert Hoover. Very few people in the US thought that Hoover was doing enough to help them out economically. Hence the use of terms like "Hoover Rags" and "Hoover Flags" to describe newspapers and empty pockets. FDR promised change, so he was voted into office.

The demonetization wasn't nearly on the same level as the Japanese or Al-Qaeda, or I'd hazard to guess the Mexicans or Muslims in Trump's rhetoric, but that's likely because those are "outside" threats that feed into the deep seated Xenophobia in the US.

Even when Trump fucks everything up people won't hate him as much as they unjustly hated Obama because he's still a white man who "came from America".
 
A lot of his supporters are going to ignore that and assume he has a mandate for his fuckery.

Anyhow this is him trying to change the conversation again. We as a country got to focus on Russia's manipulation to get this idiot in charge.

Yup, cannot make the same mistakes as during his campaign and try to focus on every horrible thing this guy does. Pick one of the worst and hammer on that and don't let him change the conversation.
 
I absolutely am. People intentionally misusing and twisting language to suit their agendas is a pet peeve of mine and mixing up majority and plurality infuriates me.

That's great, but that wasn't the main point and you're getting your panties in a bunch over nothing. Move on, or quote someone else who's gonna take your shit. Plurality or majority, my conclusion is valid. Still breezing over I'm only talking about Clinton v Trump and not Clinton v Trump v Stein v Johnson, tho, icicic. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

---

I agree

But the point I'm making is that there was a clear enemy to portray that Americans could focus on. For peral harbor it was the Japanese for 9/11 it was al-qaeda (some blame the entire religion). Those who had nothing to do with it were still blamed for it.

Did the great depression have such a thing?

Immigrants.

The left.

The usual.
 
Yup. It's always fine to blame black people; it's so normalized because it's part of America. Now the moment you question/blame the white vote or even suggest that racism/sexism/Islamphobia/homophobia were huge reasons Trump won…you'll get essays from people talking about empathising and reaching across the isle, seeing things from their perspective and to get off our high horse, coming together as one.

This this this. Quoted for new page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom