ShockingAlberto
Member
i can't understand how people are defending this guy.
There is a frustratingly large contingent of people that believe free speech is an unlimited right in all facets of life and, as a right, extends to how people should accept your speech. So, basically, I have a right to say whatever I want to you, but your rights to respond to that as a private entity or individual are specifically limited so as not to curtail my right to offend.
Gaze, if you will, into the madness of Anti-PC culture.
These are the people who want to defend Milo. It's not about Milo - I mean, it is, because for the most part these people have significant issues preventing them from separating kinship desires from admiration (i.e. calling Milo "dad" or Christina Sommers "mom"), but it is not entirely about him. At the core, it's a desire to express their views, repugnant or otherwise, and not be judged for them. It isn't about censorship from twitter, it's about negative feelings toward them at all. Essentially, the people most mocking of "safe spaces" or whatever are the people most afraid of getting their fee-fees hurt.
They want to be able to say shit like this. They don't like a movie? They want to harass the actress in it. Someone is criticizing their favorite game? They want to be able to tell them that they're being a cunt feminazi slagathor without fear of any consequences. Milo was doing that, and these people admired him for it, and the banning means that he doesn't have unlimited rights everywhere. That's what's shaking people and bringing them to defend him.