Whats next, changing the history books to not include slavery because its unfair against PoCs? This is some F'd up behaviour that needs to stop. The sooner the better.
This concept is really strange to me.Recently ex prime minister of Italy covered statues when Iran premier came to visit him.
(not Berlusconi , the Mr.Bean one)
I think this is the same case in a way.
Ubisoft is french based and is influenced a lot by french society.
European societies generally speaking are really aware not to "hurt" some religion, or some minority, or whatever.
In Usa this got an extreme where the minority is discriminating the majority, but in Europe the background of this is more "philosophical".
I dont agree because history is history, we should not modernize Bibble or Quran, put makeup on Mona Lisa or cover Cappella Sistina bodies.
Also considering what happened in Aleppo some months ago we could arrive to an extreme that we destroy history art because it "may" offend someone...
Let's make a laugh of ourselves dear europeans
They probably made that change for the base game. It's only in the specifically historically accurate Discovery Mode that it matters, and that's where Ubisoft is pointing it out.I think the following about this move:
- I'm baffled by the classroom thing.
Because it's better to censor nudity than not being able to use Assassin's Creed at all?Why would anyone want this? Its history? People have been like that in the past, why whitewash it now?
If this is enough for you to regret a purchase you didnt like the game anyway.
I remember a compilation of really racist wartime cartoons. They were shown unedited, but also prefaced by a speech from a black actress (Whoopi?) explaining that deleting those cartoons would be akin to negating their existence and that would make it much worse.
Don't rewrite history. You literally can't. You can either teach history or tell lies.
Recently ex prime minister of Italy covered statues when Iran premier came to visit him.
(not Berlusconi , the Mr.Bean one)
I think this is the same case in a way.
Ubisoft is french based and is influenced a lot by french society.
European societies generally speaking are really aware not to "hurt" some religion, or some minority, or whatever.
In Usa this got an extreme where the minority is discriminating the majority, but in Europe the background of this is more "philosophical".
I dont agree because history is history, we should not modernize Bibble or Quran, put makeup on Mona Lisa or cover Cappella Sistina bodies.
Also considering what happened in Aleppo some months ago we could arrive to an extreme that we destroy history art because it "may" offend someone...
Let's make a laugh of ourselves dear europeans
Aside from the censorship area...
(I'm assuming this game is out)
Are they aloud to edit content that you a costumer have already purchased?
It's not like a bug fix update as that would be something around distributing a faulty product.
If it was before release then ok?? (well it's not but meh)
But if they are updating peoples purchased content, then that seems out of order?
This isn't altering the original game in any way, this is a separate product / DLC that is being targeted as an education tool.
If you buy Assassin's Creed Origins (not just the standalone tour thingy) you can still see statues with boobies.
You used to see a lot of nudity on TV even in commercials in Europe like 20 years ago but today it's all gone.
Kinda my take on it. Even someone with a passing knowledge of videogames would hear "Assassin's Creed : Origins" and would know "oh, you must assassinate people in this game". Going edutainment with it is odd. But like you said it's whatever.if they want to go full force sesame street "edutainment" with this mode, that's cool.
i just find it weird considering the base game isn't particularly G rated. like why would 8 year old little johnny even be in posession of this in the first place. but it's whatever
I stopped caring about Ubisoft games years ago. It still boggles my mind that a company can go so long putting out games with poor QA and game breaking bugs, that it took pretty much the whole of the internet beating on them to change their ways. Still, I'll never give money to that company.
I stopped caring about Ubisoft games years ago. It still boggles my mind that a company can go so long putting out games with poor QA and game breaking bugs, that it took pretty much the whole of the internet beating on them to change their ways. Still, I'll never give money to that company.
I think the problem here is the law, not Ubisoft for once. I'm no expert for foreign law, though, because I'm from Germany and our country is pretty relaxed when it comes to nudity – I think many people know about the naturism (FKK) beaches in Germany. But if that's the law (for schools) and they want their mode to be used, they simply have to obey the law. Ubisoft is then not the one to blame.This is a silly and stupid answer to legitimate their cultural/commercial problem on showing nudes.
Because little johnny didn't have to. The discovery mode can be purchased seperately. I think people need to start to think of it as a stand alone educational game that just uses assets from the base game. Game owners getting it for free is basically a gesture.like why would 8 year old little johnny even be in posession of this in the first place. but it's whatever
Especially because it should be used in schols this is baffeling to me. School material should never alter things, they should never hide facts, and always be historical accurate. Same with universities. Who cares if you feel uncomfortable many things in life should make you feel like this to understand it.They said, in an interview, that many teachers wanted to use their game in classrooms but the age restriction was a problem. So they took changes, along the 'missing' hostility between characters, for the discovery mode, for it's being made for the widest audience possible. I don't see any problem here. And I think people don't understand what "censor/censorship" means.
Parents. Parents care. I work as a teacher and you don't want to mess with parents these days.Who cares if you feel uncomfortable
The discovery mode can be purchased seperately. I think people need to start to think of it as a stand alone educational game that just uses assets from the base game. Game owners getting it for free is basically a gesture.
Than maybe parents should shut the fuck upParents. Parents care. I work as a teacher and you don't want to mess with parents these days.
You can prevent hiding facts from telling them that this (topic's example) isn't accurate and there was a lot of nuditiy in that period and those statues didn't has shells on their breasts. Media education is an importan subject in school, too. You also teach to be critical about ANY media you use and how to assess the given media.
1) I think it's easier to create one version instead of different versions for different countries. The official Formula 1 game has a similiar problem: there are cars that get sponsored by alcohol companies like Johnny Walker and Martini. All those ads are entirely removed in every version of the game. One specific F1 team wears a special livery in Martini colors and shapes (those red and blue stripes) on their car and they (devs) removed the red stripes of the Martini design, to make it NOT look like Martini. The reason is that alcohol is banned, or not allowed for the targeted audience's age, in countries they are publishing their game and they didn't bother to assimilate different versions. And yeah, it sucks. There's one race, in real life, where drivers are not allowed to drink champaign at the victory ceremony, because alcohol is completely prohibited.I have some questions to you guys then:
1)
are nudes censored on all regions of this DLC?
2)
why they covered non animated statues when PEGI 12 allow them to show without problem?
3)
Android market is full of PEGI 3 to PEGI 12 educational apps with penis and vaginas
example:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.sepulkary.immortals
So why they auto-censored statues?
To answer your question of why they auto-censor their game, I guess it's to avoid any problems that could arise and to avoid using more resources for publishing different versions, and to make it accessable by as many people as possible. In Germany, Bethesda did the same with Wolfenstein and removed any Nazi and Third Reich reference, removed names and terminology, not because it is prohibited by law, but because they wanted to avoid any possible (legal) issues.
While this is generally true, their depiction in videogames might be a gray zone that could be exploited. A court process would follow though.What are you talking about? The reproduction of Nazi symbolism in Germany is forbidden by law except for educational purposes.
It’s to avoid people from gathering under that symbol and reactivating the National Socalism movement.Germany is ridiculous.
They do know that symbols didn't cause Nazis to be Nazis.
I'm talking about the stuff you have linked and you just said yourself. It is forbidden except for educational purposes and, you forgot, in art. And video games are considered as art since, I think, 2007. Wolfenstein, back then, was banned due to its violence and because video games were heavily critized back then. It's a myth that Hakenkreuze or any other Nazi symbol is not allowed per se in video games. Most publishers and developers, however, won't take the risk due the problematic subject.What are you talking about? The reproduction of Nazi symbolism in Germany is forbidden by law except for educational purposes. Furthermore the depiction of nudity is not verboten in schools even on lower classes and sometimes even shown on covers. My god look at it, so many glorious tits, asses and schlongs:
It is not forbidden in other media only in video games. Hell Wolfenstein 2 had NO absolute NO reference to nazis. be it their specific words, be it Hitler which they changed or any other reference. Same with South Park.It’s to avoid people from gathering under that symbol and reactivating the National Socalism movement.
Of course they do in secrecy, and hide the symbols and others during public appearances, but the message is that its illegal and punishable.
Same goes for Austria by the way.
In today's social climate? I'm sure this has been a thing for decades since gaming became popular. Blame Christian principles.Large companies have to tip toe around everything in today’s social climate. You never know when you’ll become the next target on Twitter.
The point is that its not even really forbidden in games. There was never a precedence case and the law does not include videgames at all. Its allowed on TV, so if a point was made in court that a videogame is to be treated the same as films in that respect then it’d be legal.It is not forbidden in other media only in video games. Hell Wolfenstein 2 had NO absolute NO reference to nazis. be it their specific words, be it Hitler which they changed or any other reference. Same with South Park.
As for Symbols otherwise they are forbidden in public but not in your own home.
no it is not allowed in video games. The reson why you can see this in movies, TV etc is because this counts as art while videogames still are not considered as art. And of course there was never a court case because that would be sucide for companies. So unless no developer/publisher fights for it we will never see them here.The point is that its not even really forbidden in games. There was never a precedence case and the law does not include videgames at all. Its allowed on TV, so if a point was made in court that a videogame is to be treated the same as films in that respect then it’d be legal.
Do you speak german? If so then you should read the link i posted before.no it is not allowed in video games. The reson why you can see this in movies, TV etc is because this counts as art while videogames still are not considered as art. And of course there was never a court case because that would be sucide for companies. So unless no developer/publisher fights for it we will never see them here.
In fact companies are going even a step further and removing everything related to nazis here. Again best example that they changed Hitler in Wolfenstein 2. Honestly it is pretty disgusting but given how fucked up our gov right now is this is not something worth fighting for since we have much more serious problems. But I will still ignore every game that is being censored for these kind of reasons. It suck that I never could play Wolfenstein 2 on PC since its geolocked but this is something I will stand for.
Do you speak german? If so then you should read the link i posted before.
Laut Paragraph 86 des deutschen Strafgesetzbuches wird die öffentliche Darstellung von verfassungsfeindlichen Symbolen - oder von Symbolen mit großer Ähnlichkeit - mit einer Freiheitsstrafe von bis zu drei Jahren oder mit einer Geldstrafe geahndet, es sei denn, das betroffene Werk trägt zur Förderung von Kunst und Wissenschaft bei oder dient der politischen Aufklärung im Sinne der Verfassung. Diese Ausnahmeregelung wird in der sogenannten Sozialadäquanzklausel festgehalten und erlaubt etwa Lehrbüchern oder Dokumentarfilmen die Verwendung von NS-Symbolen.
Für eine gewisse Verwirrung sorgt aber, dass scheinbar auch in reinen Unterhaltungsfilmen wie Indiana Jones oder Inglourious Basterds ohne Probleme Hakenkreuze vorkommen dürfen, während die Verwendung von Hakenkreuzen in Computerspielen bis heute untersagt ist. Dieser Ungleichstellung wollen wir in unserem Artikel auf den Grund gehen und anhand von Beispielen verdeutlichen, mit welchen Schwierigkeiten die Spieleindustrie in dieser Hinsicht in Deutschland zu kämpfen hat.
Dadurch, dass die USK Spielen mit Hakenkreuzen die Kennzeichnung verweigert, ergibt sich ein Teufelskreis für die Spielepublisher in Deutschland: Die Hersteller können - oder wollen - es aus wirtschaftlichen Gründen gar nicht zu einer Gerichtsverhandlung kommen lassen, da sie ohne ein USK-Siegel ihr Produkt in Deutschland nicht guten Gewissens verkaufen können. Ein Spiel ohne USK-Kennzeichnung kann nämlich von der Bundesprüfstelle für jugendgefährdende Medien (BPjM) indiziert werden, und das Werk darf dann weder öffentlich verkauft, noch darf Werbung für das Produkt gemacht werden. Zudem ist nach einer möglichen USK-Kennzeichnung nur die erste Hürde für einen Publisher bewältigt, denn die USK ist kein Gericht und so kann die Staatsanwaltschaft ein Verbot und die Beschlagnahmung eines Titels auch nach der Veröffentlichung mit USK-Alterskennzeichnung anfordern.