This isn't suprising considering thatthose that would vote "No" didn't even vote. These sort of referendums are usually won by a landslide.the entire process is a joke orchestrated by Russia.
FTFY
This isn't suprising considering thatthose that would vote "No" didn't even vote. These sort of referendums are usually won by a landslide.the entire process is a joke orchestrated by Russia.
That would be a whole 4% more than in Russia two years ago (it's kinda hard to believe it's been two years already).
I suppose they love democracy so much that they wanted to vote more than once![]()
http://gawker.com/5864945/putin-clings-to-victory-as-russias-voter-turnout-exceeds-146
To be more precisely it was 146%.
P.S. It is Russian election not Crimea.
So what are the chances of an actual war breaking out over this? Does Putin really want war that badly? I don't even know how one would play out in a nuclear age between modern countries, it would just be hell on earth
So what are the chances of an actual war breaking out over this? Does Putin really want war that badly? I don't even know how one would play out in a nuclear age between modern countries, it would just be hell on earth
If Ukraine starts the war, east-ukraine and the people there will support russia, the Pro-Russia protests in Kharkiv and Donetsk are just the beginning.
The idea behind the nuclear deterrent is to keep any war that breaks out conventional. Russia seems to be aiming for more than just Crimea. If they do indeed push farther I expect Ukraine and Russia to get into a war and then we will have to see.
The idea behind the nuclear deterrent is to keep any war that breaks out conventional. Russia seems to be aiming for more than just Crimea. If they do indeed push farther I expect Ukraine and Russia to get into a war and then we will have to see.
I'm disturbed that 12 Ukranian officials in Crimea have reportedly gone missing with one of them being seen kidnapped by armed masked men. Shady shit.
I mean see what happens. Ukraine has been moving its tanks and other armor to the Eastern Ukraine. If Russia decides to make a move they will come into direct contact with Military forces that have been ordered to fight.See what? Ukraine doesn't have nukes and west is not going to get involved. If you think Russia's reputation is bad now I can't imagine what it would look after they use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state.
Well, to be fair, it seems that there are plenty of people in Crimea who are in favor of this decision. Lots of them are attending celebratory events:
![]()
source, it's a photographer who works for Novaya Gazeta, the most (and probably only) anti-governmental Russian newspaper and who is generally pretty cool.
I'm sure the plebiscite was rigged in some way, but one wonders what would the results actually be like if it was done properly. The referendum is illegitimate no matter what, but it would be interesting to know what those people actually want and how the things would play out if this debacle with Russian didn't occur in the first place.
See what? Ukraine doesn't have nukes and the west is not going to get involved. If you think Russia's reputation is bad now I can't imagine what it would look after they use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state.
If a fight breaks out I cant see the west staying as neutral
This is kinda ironic.
The majority of Crimea really does want to join Russia. That was never really the debate. The debate is whether Crimea has a right to secede.
And what would the West do exactly?
Yes it's completely comparable to HIroshima because the generally agreed upon "rules" on the use of nukes already existed since many countries already possessed them. It's not like they were new or anything.
The majority of Crimea really does want to join Russia. That was never the debate. The debate is whether Crimea has a right to secede.
the point is how this was conducted without the actual consent of the government of the country it's in
![]()
http://gawker.com/5864945/putin-clings-to-victory-as-russias-voter-turnout-exceeds-146
To be more precisely it was 146%.
P.S. It is Russian election not Crimea.
The majority of Crimea really does want to join Russia. That was never the debate. The debate is whether Crimea has a right to secede.
There probably is a majority of people who would vote to join Russia but that's not really the point, the point is how this was conducted without the actual consent of the government of the country it's in and under military supervision and coercion. You think if a piece of Texas wanted to vote to join Mexico that everyone would be fine with that?
Mass-extinction of non-combatants was acceptable back in the day?
Polls in the past had secessionists as a minority, probably because it's not guaranteed to make anything better. What's changed is this current atmosphere of manic russophilia and the veiled threat against those who would voice opinions to the contrary.
Yes, the firebombings of Berlin, Dresden, Tokyo etc. Dresden alone resulted in the deaths 25-35 thousand in a single attack. A single attack on Tokyo killed at least 4 times that many. That's more than Hiroshima's initial death toll.
I'm not sure why you have to say this. I agree with you, I do not support this referendum in any way and I even stated so in my post.
Don't believe everything you see...Well, to be fair, it seems that there are plenty of people in Crimea who are in favor of this decision. Lots of them are attending celebratory events:
![]()
source, it's a photographer who works for Novaya Gazeta, the most (and probably only) anti-governmental Russian newspaper and who is generally pretty cool.
I'm sure the plebiscite was rigged in some way, but one wonders what would the results actually be like if it was done properly. The referendum is illegitimate no matter what, but it would be interesting to know what those people actually want and how the things would play out if this debacle with Russian didn't occur in the first place.
So what are the chances of an actual war breaking out over this? Does Putin really want war that badly? I don't even know how one would play out in a nuclear age between modern countries, it would just be hell on earth
So the EU is not accepting the result of this vote. Well lets see what they plan to do now.
So the EU is not accepting the result of this vote. Well lets see what they plan to do now.
The people have their heads so far up their asses with propaganda.
Martin Schulz - President of the European Parliament in a live TV debate on austrian television: Crimea is a part of russia now - we can do nothing. Yatsenyuk must stop his aggressive rhetoric
This will happen.
European Parliament (EP) President Martin Schulz regretted that "an illegitimate and illegal referendum" took place in Crimea on Sunday and "complicated future efforts to resolve the crisis." "This ballot was valid neither under the Ukrainian nor international law," he said in a statement here tonight. "The European Parliament fully supports territorial integrity of Ukraine. A united Ukraine must be able to determine its future freely," Schulz affirmed.
"I would like to repeat my condemnation of Russia's military incursion into Crimea. It was a breach of international law and a violation of Ukrainian sovereignty.
"Arguments that a military action is needed to protect an ethnic minority were often used in that in past, with disastrous consequences," he added.
I know. But I thought it is rather a case of USA will get away with everything, and not that it was okay to kill civilians.
But we are derailing^^
Well, that's not really possible currently. Unless you count the current illegitimate government as legitimate.
And didn't something like that happen in Kosovo as well?
I got something similar. And it's even from the official voting records:
http://online-dienste.bayreuth.de/w...?Gemeinde=4034721330000.html&Stimmbezirk=alle
![]()
Wahlbeteiligung = voter participation
Stimmberechtigte = eligible voters
Wähler = actual voters
In this case, I think there is some valid explanation although it looks fishy.In your case it seems like a television network fuck up.
this guy?
lol
Ever since the first Gulf War in 1991 there's been a precedent that you don't invade your neighbor, annex and get away with it. That might change now, with interesting ramifications worldwide.
So the EU is not accepting the result of this vote. Well lets see what they plan to do now.
this guy?
lol
Edit: Russia will not falter because of some ineffective sanctions.
What I’d do is not have USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy working with US taxpayers’ money to knock off an elected government in Ukraine, which is what they did. I wouldn’t try to force the people of Ukraine into a deal with NATO against their interests or into a deal with the European Union which is against their economic interests.
Putin strengthened Russia's economy during his previous presidency and made Russia's economy immune to USA's sanctions. They still get deals from China, Korea, and Japan even if EU and USA put sanctions on Russia.That's why they must not be ineffective. Give them some teeth and Russia will falter.