• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Ukrainian Conflict - Donetsk Boogaloo

Status
Not open for further replies.
Georgia does not have friends, if you knew anything about this topic rather than reading headlines you'd know that Russia had been eroding the sovereignty of Georgia for a long time before they decided to strike back.

It's akin to saying Poland started the second world war because they refused to meet the modest demands of gentle Hitler.

Wow. Saakashvili shelling Tskhinvali is akin to pre WW2 Poland. Gotcha.
 
I don't really know WTF Putin is doing though. Georgia was handled perfectly (from a Russian point of view), Chechnya was handled impressively as well (in a terrifying, inhuman sort of way, but yes it is now the most thoroughly pacified as it has been in all of Russian history), but this move in Ukraine is much harder to see Russia's intentions.

He's probably assuming Ukraine is going to move closer to the west anyway, annexing the Crimea is probably making the most of a bad hand.

His absolutism is gonna bite Russia in the ass eventually.
 
Without the US, Europe is a paper tiger militarily. Save the 'Yurrup jingoism man. You actually think Europe is united? That people in say Spain will be willing to die because someone in Berlin or Brussels decided to go to war? Most of Western European armies can barely operate outside their own borders, and France and UK have been in decline.

I can't believe you even mentioned Libya. They needed arms and support from the US to even achieve air superiority over Libya.

Which is exactly the reason why they need a single, united fighting force. And Europe is just as politically divided as the USA, perhaps less so.
 
I really don't understand politics. Why not just have the U.S. + the entire European Union put Russia in its place? U.S. doesn't have to go into this alone and shouldn't have to...
 
A lot.

Refusing to deal with Russia now just means they'll be stronger and even more entrenched when we DO have to fight them.

Let's rip the band-aid off and go to war now.
Why do you think you have to fight them in the future? This isn't Risk. What a dumb comment, you're potentially talking about millions of dead people here.
 
You do realize that this is exactly the same logic that got everyone in WW2? I'm not saying I disagree, but at some point Putin might get out of hands... Just think about it, he's invading an independent nation without any hesitation and without any excuse to do it.

The WW2 dynamic is totally irrelevant in the era of Nuclear weapons. The nation state's ambition is limited by the advent of thermonuclear war. The west will never try and fight Russia directly. You guys probably still have some old nukes floating about which would make Putin think twice too. Should probably get on recommissioning those SS18's stat.
 
A lot.

Refusing to deal with Russia now just means they'll be stronger and even more entrenched when we DO have to fight them.

Let's rip the band-aid off and go to war now.

Starship_Troopers.jpg
 
He's probably assuming Ukraine is going to move closer to the west anyway, annexing the Crimea is probably making the most of a bad hand.

His absolutism is gonna bite Russia in the ass eventually.

The man is taking advantage of a declining European military and building up his entire military that was in shambles for a decade until he came into the picture.

Can you really blame the guy?
 
What's with people's obsession with declaring Obama weak on foreign policy? I mean you nit pick at everything and Obama has been far from weak. Unless were supposed to go to war with everyone.
 
The WW2 dynamic is totally irrelevant in the era of Nuclear weapons. The nation state's ambition is limited by the advent of thermonuclear war. The west will never try and fight Russia directly. You guys probably still have some old nukes floating about which would make Putin think twice too. Should probably get on recommissioning those SS18's stat.

But what's the line then? Poland? Check Republic? Austria? When do nukes come in?
 
PARAH SALIN said:
Yes, I could see this one from Alaska. I'm usually not one to Told-Ya-So, but I did, despite my accurate prediction being derided as “an extremely far-fetched scenario” by the “high-brow” Foreign Policy magazine. Here’s what this “stupid” “insipid woman” predicted back in 2008: "After the Russian Army invaded the nation of Georgia, Senator Obama's reaction was one of indecision and moral equivalence, the kind of response that would only encourage Russia's Putin to invade Ukraine next.

MY SIDES
 
I really don't understand politics. Why not just have the U.S. + the entire European Union put Russia in its place? U.S. doesn't have to go into this alone and shouldn't have to...

In what way though? Economically? Militarily? Russia is the world's dominant nuclear weapons power, and the 2nd most powerful conventional military force in the world. How will you put them in place without creating possibly another global war? Economically it's possible, but you'd risk blowback as well, and Crimea/Ukraine doesn't matter as much, if it impacts your economy. What happens when you break Russia economically? They'll just sit there and watch their citizens starve when they can pretty much steamroll much of Eastern and Western Europe?
 
I'm pissed at Obama for not intervening, but you can't blame him that much for this. This is happening in EU backyard!!! Where's EU?!

Real politik, neither EU, not NATO, not Obama will risk a massive crisis with Russia over Crimea. Even the Ukrainian forces in Crimea themselves aren't resisting (so far).
 
Why not both? Threats have a lot of power. I think Russia is smart enough to understand that it can't take on the entire west.
Threats have no power when Putin would know it's a complete bluff. Nobody is going to start a war over Crimea. Sanctions are problematic when so many EU countries are reliant of Russia for oil and gas.
 
Wow. Saakashvili shelling Tskhinvali is akin to pre WW2 Poland. Gotcha.

You're intentionally misreading my point, so I'll assume you have nothing left to say and i'll move on.

I'm pissed at Obama for not intervening, but you can't blame him that much for this. This is happening in EU backyard!!! Where's EU?!

To be fair, they were very good at diplomatically helping the opposition to oust Yanukovych. They knew he would not survive that deal to relinquish his powers, that's why they basically forced the opposition to sign.

The memory of the Balkan wars, of European troops dancing with Mladic's butchers, and Rwanda weighs heavily on the conscience of European governments. Who would expect a President like Hollande, by all accounts a committed socialist, would be so actively intervene in the crisis plaguing the Central African Republic? The way the Ukranian people have acted throughout this crisis has been the most perfect example of European values in action in recent memory. If the EU isn't willing to do what it takes to protect this, what is it willing to do?
 
If you're making a threat that you have no real intention of following through on, it's not much of a threat at all.

Which is exactly why the West hasn't threatened anything, nor will.
 
The man is taking advantage of a declining European military and building up his entire military that was in shambles for a decade until he came into the picture.

Can you really blame the guy?

I'm having a hard time believing that Russia could't wait a couple months to see how the government shook out. Weak countries do not deserve to be invaded for the benefit of a nation's military.

The EU is unlikely to do anything as long as they are afraid of stepping on each other's dongs.
 
Ready? They've just disbanded their own police force. The military aren't gonna listen for the new "government" that has yet to be democratically elected.

?

Even if it was true, you know there are forces in Western Ukraine too? And they definitely don't like Russia.

Do you even know what "Georgia" scenario is?
 
A lot.

Refusing to deal with Russia now just means they'll be stronger and even more entrenched when we DO have to fight them.

Let's rip the band-aid off and go to war now.

War just isn't a viable long term solution, especially with nukes in play.

The real solution to this problem is to help Russia out. Imagine a Russia that has managed to curtail it's corruption and become a liberal democracy? A Russia that has managed to build up it's economy and greatly expanded trade with the EU, improving the prosperity of both these former rivals? Basically, what has been been done for Poland, and people hope can be done for Ukraine, must eventually be done for Russia. It's the only way that this terrible Cold War dynamic can finally and truly become a thing of the past.

The real, long term solution is not to antagonize Russia, but to befriend them. A war would only ultimately serve to keep Russia a corrupt dictatorship.
 
He's probably assuming Ukraine is going to move closer to the west anyway, annexing the Crimea is probably making the most of a bad hand.

His absolutism is gonna bite Russia in the ass eventually.

Exactly, he's consolidating his power. At this point it seems like even he knows a '68 style invasion of Kiev would be too much.
 
We can talk about that as soon as Russia bombs weddings & kills children and then pays 7200 ruble ($200) per victim and 2700 ruble ($75) per wounded person.

Russia has done far worse. Have you ever heard of Chechyna? The Afghan War? Holodomor? Kolyma? Any uncountable instances of mass deportation and ethnic cleansing?
 
And that's really sad...

The reason that Van Rumpuy and Ashton were elected as primary representatives was because they are so non-threatening.

Any fightback will come from the US, UK and French. Obama is joke status on that front, the UK has nothing to back up it's words and the French are probably being managed down by the Germans who worry the heating is going to turn off in the winter.

Seriously it's up to you guys. You need to get your nukes back. They are useful.
 
The thing is that this probably exactly what Putin is thinking as well. So I wonder what would happen if the EU shows some muscles

Russia would show its larger muscles. Putin is a KGB guy, he's one of those supervillain/super politician guys. He's reading this situation like a hawk. Secure Sevastopol, which he has because there were about 30,000 troops already there. Send across helicopters that no one can really identify carrying who knows what. Have his troops be masked, wearing no insignia and secure airports and the state broadcast building, effectively preventing any Western Ukrainian leader from coming and any word really getting out. Now he's gauging the US/EU response which has been little to nothing of substance. Next he'll watch Ukraine. Any military movements etc.

Who knows what he really has planned, but he's playing this like a chess match. Getting his pieces in order, drawing the other side to make the first move etc.
 
War just isn't a viable long term solution, especially with nukes in play.

The real solution to this problem is to help Russia out. Imagine a Russia that has managed to curtail it's corruption and become a liberal democracy? A Russia that has managed to build up it's economy and greatly expanded trade with the EU, improving the prosperity of both these former rivals? Basically, what has been been done for Poland, and people hope can be done for Ukraine, must eventually be done for Russia. It's the only way that this terrible Cold War dynamic can finally and truly become a thing of the past.

The real, long term solution is not to antagonize Russia, but to befriend them.

As ideal as that would be, I highly doubt that will happen, seeing as how many on both sides still genuinely dislike each other and are stuck in a Cold War mentality.

Hell, even in the EU supposedly people on the same "side" barely tolerate one another and bicker over stupid shit.
 
The reason that Van Rumpuy and Ashton were elected as primary representatives was because they are so non-threatening.

Any fightback will come from the US, UK and French. Obama is joke status on that front, the UK has nothing to back up it's words and the French are probably being managed down by the Germans who worry the heating is going to turn off in the winter.

Seriously it's up to you guys. You need to get your nukes back. They are useful.

Another sad thing is that Obama has the strongest stand on this... Germany trying to get off nuclear power is one of the worst things that happened in the past few years....
 
The reason that Van Rumpuy and Ashton were elected as primary representatives was because they are so non-threatening.

Any fightback will come from the US, UK and French. Obama is joke status on that front, the UK has nothing to back up it's words and the French are probably being managed down by the Germans who worry the heating is going to turn off in the winter.

Seriously it's up to you guys. You need to get your nukes back. They are useful.

Considering that the average winter temperature was +10 Celsius or so, there's no need to worry about that.
 
As ideal as that would be, I highly doubt that will happen, seeing as how many on both sides still genuinely dislike each other and are stuck in a Cold War mentality.

Hell, even in the EU supposedly people on the same "side" barely tolerate one another and bicker over stupid shit.

You're talking about appeasement, a fundamental misunderstanding of the way the mind of a viscous bully like Putin works.

He's consolidating his power in Crimea for now, but I doubt anyone believes he has given up on Ukraine.
 
Russia would show its larger muscles. Putin is a KGB guy, he's one of those supervillain/super politician guys. He's reading this situation like a hawk. Secure Sevastopol, which he has because there were about 30,000 troops already there. Send across helicopters that no one can really identify carrying who knows what. Have his troops be masked, wearing no insignia and secure airports and the state broadcast building, effectively preventing any Western Ukrainian leader from coming and any word really getting out. Now he's gauging the US/EU response which has been little to nothing of substance. Next he'll watch Ukraine. Any military movements etc.

Who knows what he really has planned, but he's playing this like a chess match. Getting his pieces in order, drawing the other side to make the first move etc.

If Ukraine can avoid the war, loosing Crimea is not the worst... Ukraine would still win overall. The whole country was almost lost to Russia. One peninsula is not too terrible.
 
Ukrainian forces are ready for "Georgia" scenario. EU can at least say something...

Ukrainian forces fighting back would probably play directly into the Russian gameplan. They are doing the smart thing right now by showing restraint.

I'm sure the EU will prepare some kind of statement over the weekend, but it's not like that will do anything.
 
Another sad thing is that Obama has the strongest stand on this... Germany trying to get off nuclear power is one of the worst things that happened in the past few years....

Germans are fucking cretins on that front but getting off nuclear power has little to do with your ability to fashion weapons today. Pretty much any western country can cobble together a boosted fission device and probably even a Teller-Ulam thermonuclear relatively easily.

Ukraine should never have gotten rid of it's nuclear arsenal. It is suicide to do that, the reason why so many countries pursue the bomb is to protect themselves from aggressors.
 
Russia has done far worse. Have you ever heard of Chechyna? The Afghan War? Holodomor? Kolyma? Any uncountable instances of mass deportation and ethnic cleansing?

I'm talking about now of course.

Kinda crazy to mention Holodomor + Kolyma. Putin was not even alive when that happened. Following that logic, I could blame the current US + Obama for murdering native Americans. Could also blame current Germany + Merkel for the holocaust.

It's even worse to use those insanely horrible events to defend current horrible actions by current countries. "Look we aren't that bad. We only murdered a few millions. Holocaust + World War 1+2 were much worse!!!!one". We, the "good" west, should keep our mouths shut. We are the ones invading countries and killing and injuring people all around the world because "terrorists!!!". Fuck us first.
 
Whilst the EU might find it tough to impose sanctions, I think they should consider it, the US certain seems to be, with both threatening a boycott of the G8 Summit at Sochi.


Obama might skip Sochi G8 summit if Russia intervenes in Ukraine - U.S. official


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama and European leaders would consider skipping a G8 summit in Sochi, Russia planned for this summer if Russia intervenes militarily in Ukraine, a senior U.S. official said on Friday.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the United States is consulting with its European partners on potential costs that might be imposed on Russia for any Ukraine intervention.

U.S. officials told Reuters that Washington has seen indications of troop movements from and into Ukraine's Crimea region on Friday, but their numbers are unclear, as are the intentions of those movements.

The senior U.S. official said the U.S. response could also include withholding deeper trade and commerce ties that Moscow is seeking.
 
This might be an unpopular opinion, but considering that that the majority of the population in Crimea are ethnic Russians and that the historical ties of the area with Ukraine are not very strong, the best solution would probably be to allow Crimea independence, although that would of course lead it to become under heavy influence from Russia.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom