• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Uncharted: The Nathan Drake Collection | Review Thread

Marty-esque said:
Is there a pre order bonus for this?
Click to expand...
Amazon -

Pre-order UNCHARTED: The Nathan Drake Collection and receive early access to The Nathan Drake Pack at launch which includes: UNCHARTED Drake’s Fortune Drake skin, UNCHARTED 2: Among Thieves Drake Skin, UNCHARTED 3: Drake’s Deception Drake Skin, Wetsuit Drake Skin, Nepal Drake Skin, Golden AK-47, and Golden 92FS. Pre-order bonus code will be emailed to you within two days of your completed shipment. Amazon reserves the right to change or modify this promotion at any time.
Click to expand...
 
FranXico said:
Interesting that Jim joined the "Uncharted 3 better than Uncharted 2" team.
Click to expand...

I can pretty easily see how someone who played the UC3 first (especially from this collection) will think that it's a better game. It's similar structurally to UC2, follows its blueprints, but technically better in some ways. Better puzzles, more elaborate encounters (shipyard battle is the peak of Uncharted gameplay, and people who complain about it are mostly those who don't get how these games really should be played) better visuals, deeper character interaction in terms of story exposition.
Now that the aiming responsiveness is not an issue in the game anymore, the only things really worse about UC3 are:
a) it's structurally a copy of UC2
b) has worse pacing.

I think for someone playing them back to back, or UC3 first, neither of these things would outweigh the positives.
 
Lord Error said:
I can pretty easily see how someone who played the UC3 first (especially from this collection) will think that it's a better game. It's similar structurally to UC2, follows its blueprints, but technically better in some ways. Better puzzles, more elaborate encounters (shipyard battle is the peak of Uncharted gameplay, and people who complain about it are mostly those who don't get how these games really should be played) better visuals, deeper character interaction in terms of story exposition.
Now that the aiming responsiveness is not an issue in the game anymore, the only things really worse about UC3 are:
a) it's structurally a copy of UC2
b) has worse pacing.

I think for someone playing them back to back, or UC first, neither of these things would outweight the positives.
Click to expand...


I don't really agree with your very dismissive statement there. It always surprises me when people say if you played Uncharted 2 and 3 they are very similar. Upon playing Uncharted 3 for the first time I thought it was a noticeably worse game than Uncharted 2, easily. Worse melee system, worse encounters design and shitty puzzles. I honestly can't think of anything about Uncharted 3 I liked better than 2. Maybe the airplane setpiece but that's about it, that and the shipyard chapter which has no relevance to the main story at all. This was all without even including the fucked aiming at release as a reason. It's not even like I went into U3 wanting to dislike it either, especially with how much I loved U2.

It's admittedly a long time since I've played any of the games in the trilogy, and tbh I have no desire to replay them, but I have incredibly fond memories of U2. I never want to play U3 again. I am delighted the remaster has turned out so well though, for fans of any of the games or getting to play them for the first time, they deserve a good collection for their money and it seems Bluepoint has at least delivered on that front.
 
enigmatic_alex44 said:
Yikes.

From 3 of the "games of the generation" to a mid 80s Metacritic score. This'll end up with a lower average than Uncharted 1 on it's own. Why such a huge drop off? Even GOW3 Remastered on it's own scored higher O_o
Click to expand...

I don't think it's bad, just means our standards have changed over the last few years.
 
Lord Error said:
I can pretty easily see how someone who played the UC3 first (especially from this collection) will think that it's a better game. It's similar structurally to UC2, follows its blueprints, but technically better in some ways. Better puzzles, more elaborate encounters (shipyard battle is the peak of Uncharted gameplay, and people who complain about it are mostly those who don't get how these games really should be played) better visuals, deeper character interaction in terms of story exposition.
Now that the aiming responsiveness is not an issue in the game anymore, the only things really worse about UC3 are:
a) it's structurally a copy of UC2
b) has worse pacing.

I think for someone playing them back to back, or UC first, neither of these things would outweight the positives.
Click to expand...

Or you played them all as they released and put 2 and 3 on similar levels. I don't think anyone really needs to justify why they might like 3 better then 2. It's easy to see there both excellent games with various different beats from each other and amazing set peices.
 
I can't choose between 2 and 3. 2 had better pacing and moment to moment gameplay but the story, puzzles, and presentation of 3 was the best in the series and those are key components in why I love this series. 3's ship graveyard is also the best combat sandbox in the series.

I also think the first had the best sense of discovery and mystery but the other games are a huge step up.
 
RoboPlato said:
I can't choose between 2 and 3. 2 had better pacing and moment to moment gameplay but the story, puzzles, and presentation of 3 was the best in the series and those are key components in why I love this series. 3's ship graveyard is also the best combat sandbox in the series.

I also think the first had the best sense of discovery and mystery but the other games are a huge step up.
Click to expand...

Don't think so. 3's story is strung together to service the set pieces. Doesn't even make sense at some points, with the ship graveyard having no real reason for being in the game other than it being another set piece. Naughty Dog basically admitted as much.
 
RoboPlato said:
I can't choose between 2 and 3. 2 had better pacing and moment to moment gameplay but the story, puzzles, and presentation of 3 was the best in the series and those are key components in why I love this series. 3's ship graveyard is also the best combat sandbox in the series.

I also think the first had the best sense of discovery and mystery but the other games are a huge step up.
Click to expand...
Yeah I agree.
 
SlasherJPC said:
Or you played them all as they released and put 2 and 3 on similar levels. I don't think anyone really needs to justify why they might like 3 better then 2. It's easy to see there both excellent games with various different beats from each other and amazing set peices.
Click to expand...
IMHO, to put a sequel to a same level as a game before it, said sequel needs to be better in some ways. If it's exact same thing, it would inevitably feel worse. I do, for the record, consider UC2 and UC3 as equal, each with its own strengths.
 
All 3 games are basically separate setpieces tied together afterwards. Uncharted 3 has the best separate setpieces, but ties them up the absolute worst. Even the timeline in 3 is insanely all over the place.
I feel better if I think of 3 as a companion to Uncharted 2. Stuff that was edited out not because of lower quality, but because it didnt gel well with some of Uncharted 2's scenarios.
As has been pointed out already, 3's shipyard is Uncharted at it's absolute best, but doesnt fit anywhere in any of the games. In hindsight Im glad they included it though, even if it disturbed the pacing of the game.
 
Lord Error said:
IMHO, to put a sequel to a same level as a game before it, said sequel needs to be better in some ways. If it's exact same thing, it would inevitably feel worse. I do, for the record, consider UC2 and UC3 as equal, each with its own strengths.
Click to expand...

Really depends what you see as "better" I think the setpieces in 3, location variety, and puzzles are better then 2. So in that thought it would be better, but not everyone will agree. Just depends on a person's personal viewpoint. 2 and 3 are similar to me because one lacks a better story but the other flows a bit better otherwise.
 
RoboPlato said:
I can't choose between 2 and 3. 2 had better pacing and moment to moment gameplay but the story, puzzles, and presentation of 3 was the best in the series and those are key components in why I love this series. 3's ship graveyard is also the best combat sandbox in the series.

I also think the first had the best sense of discovery and mystery but the other games are a huge step up.
Click to expand...

Here's the way I see it between the two:

They each have their flaws, one is not necessarily above the other unless you highly value story flow and presentation over gameplay (which wouldn't be unprecedented for this series if you're a fan of it).

That said, there's more to the games than what you mentioned where one or the other fails at doing and these deal more with gameplay aspects and encounter/level design for each game.

UC2 has a terrible melee system, for example. The only time you should ever melee any enemy in the game is if it's a blindfire + melee (steelfist) otherwise, you should never do it unless it's the last guy left and no one else is around.

UC2 also never challenges you to use all of Drake's movement options or abilities. There are no encounters in the game where you have to climb, jump, run, climb, roll, etc etc. The encounters are often very static except for the train segment, tank in the village, and the on-rails car jumping part (all of which take place at the back end of UC2). However, you can get through the train without ever really moving much by using the (very little) cover they provide you with and the tank section isn't a typical combat encounter and neither is the jumping from truck-to-truck section.

And finally, UC2 doesn't have that one encounter that is extremely memorable for its gameplay above all else. Sort of falls in line with the above but basically, there isn't an encounter in the game where you are forced to actually move around a large arena and are taking advantage of all of the options you have.

At the same time, there are tons of things UC2 gets right with gameplay such as stealth almost always being possible when you don't think it will work. There are parts in the game you can stealth through that aren't obvious to be possible, but you can. The design for that option is there in a lot of chapters/sections in the game and the player is awarded for it by then not getting another wave of enemies.

UC2 also has certain power weapons hidden in places before combat encounters, things like the Wes-44, Grenade Launchers, Desert-5, etc etc. UC3 does this at some points as well but they're not super well hidden and often times the game just gives you those weapons in front of you when you reach an encounter (see: the cruise ship as an example).

UC3, on the other hand, gets the melee system mostly right (there's some context sensitive animations that can take too long and result in you almost dying or dying anyway). The melee system in this game allows you to mix up between shooting and doing melee unlike the previous two games and it really does it well. Couple that with steelfisting and the most satisfying thing to do in UC3 is shoot, roll, melee a dude, shoot another guy right after, and then get another guy with some blindfire and then melee them for a kill. Stringing all of that together just feels... great and really is the kind of gameplay you've always wanted out of Uncharted since the first one but they just couldn't get the melee right until the 3rd game.

UC3 also gets (most) of its combat encounters right. It challenges you, partway through the game, to make use of Drake's movement options. Starting with the cruise ship all the way through to at least the City of Brass. They force you to move because if you don't then you're going to get destroyed. That's why at that point in the game the areas are more open and there's less cover to hide behind/cover is breakable. They want to encourage you to move! And they can do that now because of the melee system as well.

The downsides to UC3's gameplay/design, though, are that there really isn't any forethought into stealth for many of the chapters. For example, the cruise ship -- there's a part where they set it up as though you can stealth through it (Drake even has a unique line where he explicitly says doing it quietly, as though the devs intended you to be able to stealth it) but you can't. No matter how you take out the guys in front of you, quietly, the way they are lined up someone is going to spot you. At most, you can take out three of them quietly and then you will get spotted.

There's only one chapter in the entire game where stealth was actually at the front of the developer's minds when making the encounters and where they actually reward you for doing it and that;s the Syria chapter. Multiple sections in this chapter are possible to stealth through and you know what happens when you do? You skip an entire enemy wave. And most often, the enemy wave you skip saves you ammo + time because the wave you might die from a lot.

After Syria, there's no other point in the game where an encounter is designed to be possible to be stealthed and guns blazing aside from the airport chapter where there's two sections -- but both of these sections aren't obvious to the player, especially the last section because it relies on you banking a grenade on a propane tank to kill the last two guards without it triggering an alert.

Hell, even a section in the game that would be prime for stealth doesn't allow it to be possible (the sandstorm section). You can do the first half but after that first half you get spotted -- that's stupid!

So, all in all, they each have their flaws. I'd rate UC2 above UC3 just because it gets the right balance down between stealth and action in every chapter and it doesn't feel like, anywhere in the game, that stealth was an afterthought. Of course, in UC2 there is a point where you can't do it and the only option is going on the offense but what I'm describing is that in a lot of parts of UC2 the option to stealth is there and in UC3 the option is very minimal.

But the best part of UC3 is definitely how the combat itself flows and that's one of the reasons I simply can't hate UC3, no matter how disjointed its story appears to be in pacing/presentation. And that's why I'm looking forward to replaying it again, especially with the properly fixed aiming and tweaks/skins!
 
I preordered. I was a little on the fence but I love me some uncharted. Even though it seems like it doesn't hold up as well I really want to play the first again. At least for the nostalgia.
 
Revven said:
Here's the way I see it between the two:

They each have their flaws, one is not necessarily above the other unless you highly value story flow and presentation over gameplay (which wouldn't be unprecedented for this series if you're a fan of it).

That said, there's more to the games than what you mentioned where one or the other fails at doing and these deal more with gameplay aspects and encounter/level design for each game.

UC2 has a terrible melee system, for example. The only time you should ever melee any enemy in the game is if it's a blindfire + melee (steelfist) otherwise, you should never do it unless it's the last guy left and no one else is around.

UC2 also never challenges you to use all of Drake's movement options or abilities. There are no encounters in the game where you have to climb, jump, run, climb, roll, etc etc. The encounters are often very static except for the train segment, tank in the village, and the on-rails car jumping part (all of which take place at the back end of UC2). However, you can get through the train without ever really moving much by using the (very little) cover they provide you with and the tank section isn't a typical combat encounter and neither is the jumping from truck-to-truck section.

And finally, UC2 doesn't have that one encounter that is extremely memorable for its gameplay above all else. Sort of falls in line with the above but basically, there isn't an encounter in the game where you are forced to actually move around a large arena and are taking advantage of all of the options you have.

At the same time, there are tons of things UC2 gets right with gameplay such as stealth almost always being possible when you don't think it will work. There are parts in the game you can stealth through that aren't obvious to be possible, but you can. The design for that option is there in a lot of chapters/sections in the game and the player is awarded for it by then not getting another wave of enemies.

UC2 also has certain power weapons hidden in places before combat encounters, things like the Wes-44, Grenade Launchers, Desert-5, etc etc. UC3 does this at some points as well but they're not super well hidden and often times the game just gives you those weapons in front of you when you reach an encounter (see: the cruise ship as an example).

UC3, on the other hand, gets the melee system mostly right (there's some context sensitive animations that can take too long and result in you almost dying or dying anyway). The melee system in this game allows you to mix up between shooting and doing melee unlike the previous two games and it really does it well. Couple that with steelfisting and the most satisfying thing to do in UC3 is shoot, roll, melee a dude, shoot another guy right after, and then get another guy with some blindfire and then melee them for a kill. Stringing all of that together just feels... great and really is the kind of gameplay you've always wanted out of Uncharted since the first one but they just couldn't get the melee right until the 3rd game.

UC3 also gets (most) of its combat encounters right. It challenges you, partway through the game, to make use of Drake's movement options. Starting with the cruise ship all the way through to at least the City of Brass. They force you to move because if you don't then you're going to get destroyed. That's why at that point in the game the areas are more open and there's less cover to hide behind/cover is breakable. They want to encourage you to move! And they can do that now because of the melee system as well.

The downsides to UC3's gameplay/design, though, are that there really isn't any forethought into stealth for many of the chapters. For example, the cruise ship -- there's a part where they set it up as though you can stealth through it (Drake even has a unique line where he explicitly says doing it quietly, as though the devs intended you to be able to stealth it) but you can't. No matter how you take out the guys in front of you, quietly, the way they are lined up someone is going to spot you. At most, you can take out three of them quietly and then you will get spotted.

There's only one chapter in the entire game where stealth was actually at the front of the developer's minds when making the encounters and where they actually reward you for doing it and that;s the Syria chapter. Multiple sections in this chapter are possible to stealth through and you know what happens when you do? You skip an entire enemy wave. And most often, the enemy wave you skip saves you ammo + time because the wave you might die from a lot.

After Syria, there's no other point in the game where an encounter is designed to be possible to be stealthed and guns blazing aside from the airport chapter where there's two sections -- but both of these sections aren't obvious to the player, especially the last section because it relies on you banking a grenade on a propane tank to kill the last two guards without it triggering an alert.

Hell, even a section in the game that would be prime for stealth doesn't allow it to be possible (the sandstorm section). You can do the first half but after that first half you get spotted -- that's stupid!

So, all in all, they each have their flaws. I'd rate UC2 above UC3 just because it gets the right balance down between stealth and action in every chapter and it doesn't feel like, anywhere in the game, that stealth was an afterthought. Of course, in UC2 there is a point where you can't do it and the only option is going on the offense but what I'm describing is that in a lot of parts of UC2 the option to stealth is there and in UC3 the option is very minimal.

But the best part of UC3 is definitely how the combat itself flows and that's one of the reasons I simply can't hate UC3, no matter how disjointed its story appears to be in pacing/presentation. And that's why I'm looking forward to replaying it again, especially with the properly fixed aiming and tweaks/skins!
Click to expand...

Funnily my memory of the melee is the other way round. I used melee in Uncharted 2 all the time because it was quick, easy and no nonsense. It takes out enemies quickly and is useful in a jam. In Uncharted 3 I thought it was nothing but a fucking nusicance. Especially when so many of them large shotgun fuckers just dander up to you and shoot you in the face. When you try to melee them you get shot to death by other enemies as it's so long, protracted and shit. It didn't help that quite a few these encounters aren't in a huge space making them plain unfun a lot of times, especially on higher difficulties.

I honestly started to hate the combat towards the end of 3. It did a very poor job in trying to make you move around by flooding you with enemies and a large number of shotgun enemies. It was never done in a fun, smart and satisfying way design wise. Uncharted 2 handled combat is a much more fun and smarter way.
 
Big_Al said:
Funnily my memory of the melee is the other way round. I used melee in Uncharted 2 all the time because it wad quick, easy and no nonsense. It takes out enemies quickly and is useful in a jam. In Uncharted 3 I thought it was nothing but a fucking nusicance. Especially when so many of them large shotgun fuckers just dander up to you and shoot you in the face. When you try to melee them you get shot to death by other enemies as it's so long, protracted and shit. It didn't help that quite a few these encounters aren't in a huge space making them plain unfun a lot of times.

I honestly started to hate the combat towards the end of 3.
Click to expand...

Your memory must be completely off then because UC2's melee is awful. You get locked into a 1-on-1 where you have to mash square then you're forced to wait for the enemy throw out a move you counter with triangle, then you mash square some more to finish them (it's also extremely slow). In UC3, you just mash square and they die pretty quickly -- you're not locked into it either, you can stop and hit another guy instead or grab them and throw the guy you're meleeing into another guy (or throw them at a piece of cover). In UC2 you can't melee armored shotgun guys unless their helmet is knocked off whereas in UC3 you can melee them regardless, it will just take a shit ton of hits with your melee that you're better off shooting their helmet off and headshotting them instead.

The only time melee is ever just a few hits in UC2 is if it's a weak enemy (typically the guys covered in grey camo/body armor) or if you're steelfisting (blindfire + melee) which the latter is in all three games.
 
My issues with Uncharted 3:
-Inconsistent plot/story (definitely felt like they were trying to string set pieces together at times; some key questions were either left unanswered or weren't explained well)
-Some pacing issues (see desert level, action/puzzle balance in the first half of the game vs. the second)
-Encounter design (stealth not being a viable option at many times, enemies were placed at annoying locations)
-Main villains were a disappointment, despite having a great set-up
-Controls could have been more fluid/responsive (U2 was definitely better here, and Drake trying but failing to touch every single wall looked a bit dumb)
-Melee is the best in the series, but should still have been way better (in particular, fighting the big dudes basically plays out the same way every time)
-the ending

Despite all that I still love the game. Its just that U2's quality is persistent. It is not in U3.
 
W.S. said:
Plus lack of extras.

I'm glad that the core games were given a good remastering but to it's detriment it's a very lean package.
Click to expand...

Lean?

So far, here's what's missing:

- U2 multiplayer
- U3 multiplayer
- Golden Abyss (lol narrative reasons)

Here's what's added:

- 1080p/60FPS on all games
- Motion blur
- Tweaked difficulty settings
- New trophies
- Photomode
- Cheats being added to every game (a huge problem I had with U3), so you'll see stuff like Fat Drake in all of the games, picking your weapon, infinite ammo, playing as NPCs, etc

What else is it missing?
 
RoboPlato said:
I can't choose between 2 and 3. 2 had better pacing and moment to moment gameplay but the story, puzzles, and presentation of 3 was the best in the series and those are key components in why I love this series. 3's ship graveyard is also the best combat sandbox in the series.

I also think the first had the best sense of discovery and mystery but the other games are a huge step up.
Click to expand...

Loudninja said:
Yeah I agree.
Click to expand...

I agree also.

2 and 3 are amazing, but if I had to choose a winner, it would be 3 due to the amazing set-pieces. 2 had awesome set-pieces as well, but the ones in 3 are just ridiculous awesome.

I'm excited to see if Uncharted 4 can top them and if the gameplay from E3 this year is any indication - we may have a new reigning champion of set-piece moments!!!

[Note to Naughty Dog: We need more rain in Uncharted 4. Weather = awesome atmosphere]
 
SlasherJPC said:
Really depends what you see as "better" I think the setpieces in 3, location variety, and puzzles are better then 2. So in that thought it would be better, but not everyone will agree. Just depends on a person's personal viewpoint. 2 and 3 are similar to me because one lacks a better story but the other flows a bit better otherwise.
Click to expand...

Uncharted 3 would've been a great Uncharted Remix for encounters and level design. Narrative-wise, it really shows how much it has been compromised for meeting the release date.

Let's not forget the horrible aiming pre-patch.
 
enigmatic_alex44 said:
Yikes.

From 3 of the "games of the generation" to a mid 80s Metacritic score. This'll end up with a lower average than Uncharted 1 on it's own. Why such a huge drop off? Even GOW3 Remastered on it's own scored higher O_o
Click to expand...

The presentation does so much for these games. Outside of that, the shooting is pretty average, and the puzzles/platforming are barely worth mentioning. I'd say that's where they belonged the whole time, but flashiness goes a long way.
 
Lord Error said:
I can pretty easily see how someone who played the UC3 first (especially from this collection) will think that it's a better game. It's similar structurally to UC2, follows its blueprints, but technically better in some ways. Better puzzles, more elaborate encounters (shipyard battle is the peak of Uncharted gameplay, and people who complain about it are mostly those who don't get how these games really should be played) better visuals, deeper character interaction in terms of story exposition.
Now that the aiming responsiveness is not an issue in the game anymore, the only things really worse about UC3 are:
a) it's structurally a copy of UC2
b) has worse pacing.

I think for someone playing them back to back, or UC3 first, neither of these things would outweigh the positives.
Click to expand...
The story in UC3 is wretched shit, especially the way it wraps up and doesn't have a good final boss.
 
Even with its flaws I like U3's story because is different than the other two, U2 feels like the same story of U1 just with better development.

I still think that U2 is the most tight entry, but the "U3 is horrible, story is shit" is way too much for me to take it as a serious opinion.
 
MegaSackman said:
Even with its flaws I like U3's story because is different than the other two, U2 feels like the same story of U1 just with better development.

I still think that U2 is the most tight entry, but the "U3 is horrible, story is shit" is way too much for me to take it as a serious opinion.
Click to expand...

Indiana Jones 4 story was different. Automatically great story.
 
Revven said:
Your memory must be completely off then because UC2's melee is awful. You get locked into a 1-on-1 where you have to mash square then you're forced to wait for the enemy throw out a move you counter with triangle, then you mash square some more to finish them (it's also extremely slow). In UC3, you just mash square and they die pretty quickly -- you're not locked into it either, you can stop and hit another guy instead or grab them and throw the guy you're meleeing into another guy (or throw them at a piece of cover). In UC2 you can't melee armored shotgun guys unless their helmet is knocked off whereas in UC3 you can melee them regardless, it will just take a shit ton of hits with your melee that you're better off shooting their helmet off and headshotting them instead.

The only time melee is ever just a few hits in UC2 is if it's a weak enemy (typically the guys covered in grey camo/body armor) or if you're steelfisting (blindfire + melee) which the latter is in all three games.
Click to expand...

Well fuck. If I'm completely wrong about then I do apologise as it's such a strong memory for me in disliking the melee, i'd certainly be willing to admit if I was wrong in that regard. I'll maybe pick up the collection in the future when it's cheaper. The thought of fighting all those armoured shotgun folks in 3 again doesn't exactly excite me though. (I know they were in 2 but I remember them being more prominent in 3)
 
Strangelove77 said:
Why is this coming out on the 9th? Games usually always come out on tuesdays. Weird.
Click to expand...
I love it and I wish the industry would follow suite. Releasing on a Friday means I get to take the game home, unwrap it, and then play it all weekend.

Yeah, I know Tuesday or Friday is six of one, half a dozen of the other. It just works better psychologically for me.

Also, to chime in on the 2/3 debate. I think it's very clear 1 is the weakest, while 2 or 3 are pretty much well matched. I honestly can't say one is better than the other, as I love them both for different reasons.
 
MegaSackman said:
Even with its flaws I like U3's story because is different than the other two, U2 feels like the same story of U1 just with better development.

I still think that U2 is the most tight entry, but the "U3 is horrible, story is shit" is way too much for me to take it as a serious opinion.
Click to expand...

It's shit for several reasons. The villains are pitiful (which is saying a lot considering lazarovich) the story goes nowhere, leaves a lot hanging, and the entire plot was designed around set pieces anyway instead of the other way around (what the hell were they thinking). It added way more drama and seriousness but poorly handled each of those issues.
 
MMarston said:
I really wanna see reactions from gaffers playing these games for the first time
Click to expand...

The back half of Uncharted 2 and all of Uncharted 3 will be new to me.

I haven't played Uncharted 1 since 2007, so I've forgotten almost everything about it, anyway.
 
Is there no way to turn off auto-aim? Because the stickiness absolutely f*cked me on the boss fight at the end of the demo - like, it became impossible to hit the helicopter because the reticule would get stuck on it as it moved, making it impossible to lead shots with the grenade launcher. So frustrating and I don't remember having had this problem at all in the original.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Uncharted Nathan Drake Is Definitely In This Legally Dubious Horror Game
Indie 
27
345
Humdinger replied
Saros | Review Thread
Review  8 9 10 11 12
584
875
Majima Everywhere System replied
REPLACED | Review thread
Review 
23
596
AJBungah replied
Invincible VS | Review Thread
Analysis Review 
0
101
Draugoth replied
Darwin's Paradox! | Review Thread
News Review 
18
711
Heimdall_Xtreme replied
Top Bottom