"Part of the reason [for including 512MB of RAM] is more RAM means easier development for game developers," Sony president of Worldwide Studios Shu Yoshida told Eurogamer at Gamescom.
"But as important as that is to allow the PS Vita always to do more while the game is running in the background, or when you switch between the game and other applications or system software functionalities.
"So the reason why we were able to include something like Party, which enables cross-game voice chat, is because we designed Vita so it always has enough resources to handle something like that behind the game while it's running."
"It has been very funny," he said. "There were some rumours for the last few months. Some developer mentioned the RAM was halved. We never announced the amount of RAM, and we never changed it.
"We've been making games, right, and we've been showing the games, like Uncharted, since January. If RAM gets cut in the middle of development, there's no way we can complete the games. So I was like, what's going on?
"I got lots of Tweets saying, Sony made a huge mistake by reducing the amount of RAM. We never talked about the amount of RAM and we never cut it.
"So going into Gamescom we agreed there was no reason we should hide it, so we just added it to the specifications. We always had 512MB of main RAM and 128MB of V-RAM. Actually when you add them together, PS Vita has more RAM than PS3 [the PS3 has 256MB of XDR DRAM main memory and 256MB of GDDR3 video memory]."
Massa said:FYI, you can already stream any video on your PS3 to a PSP anywhere in the world.
KAL2006 said:I wonder what the Vita will actually come with
I hope it at least comes with the soft pouch, cloth and cradle, and maybe even a 4GB card to get you started.
I would of course go and buy a hard cover and a larger memory card somewhere down the line.
I don't doubt your credibility, but this will have to be a case that I have to see it to believe it. Everything about this system seems to indicate that it will be an energy sucking beast. A gloriously beautiful energy sucking beast, but still one nonetheless. Now if Sony uses some kind of special battery technology I will be more likely to believe their statement of it being on par with the psp's battery life, but all indications point otherwise.Meisadragon said:The battery life is similar to the PSP, and the Vita doesn't have an UMD drive, so that'll help.
KAL2006 said:I wonder what the Vita will actually come with
I hope it at least comes with the soft pouch, cloth and cradle, and maybe even a 4GB card to get you started.
I would of course go and buy a hard cover and a larger memory card somewhere down the line.
No moving parts at all is huge for battery life.AzureNightmare said:but all indications point otherwise.
Their special battery technology is called making a big system so you can cram a giant battery in it.AzureNightmare said:I don't doubt your credibility, but this will have to be a case that I have to see it to believe it. Everything about this system seems to indicate that it will be an energy sucking beast. A gloriously beautiful energy sucking beast, but still one nonetheless. Now if Sony uses some kind of special battery technology I will be more likely to believe their statement of it being on par with the psp's battery life, but all indications point otherwise.
And those. OLED screen is a huge help.Man said:No moving parts at all is huge for battery life.
Oled screen will also help.
I believe it will pretty much be the same.
Man said:The Xbox brand has been making raw money on proprietary solutions this gen while the PS3 used open standards. Lesson learned then for Sony.
OldJadedGamer said:You are giving me nightmares again about the forced Value pack we had with the PSP. Shhhhhh, let's make sure we actually can buy a core unit this time around.
Yes, unfortunate really. I don't think we'll ever see anything like that on PS4.Man said:The Xbox brand has been making raw money on proprietary solutions this gen while the PS3 used open standards. Lesson learned then for Sony.
KAL2006 said:Well $250 is a lock, so may as well hope it comes with some shit, if I had to guess
-cloth
-soft pouch
-4GB memory card
-cradle
-preloaded demos
KAL2006 said:Well $250 is a lock, so may as well hope it comes with some shit, if I had to guess
-cloth
-soft pouch
-4GB memory card
-cradle
-preloaded demos
All memory cards were expensive back then.Billychu said:PSP memory cards were certainly expensive
Meisadragon said:I think I got a 32MB card with the PSP value pack lol. Don't really remember though, it's been such a long time.
There may be something like that for the Vita.
"It has been very funny," he said. "There were some rumours for the last few months. Some developer mentioned the RAM was halved. We never announced the amount of RAM, and we never changed it.
KAL2006 said:Well $250 is a lock, so may as well hope it comes with some shit, if I had to guess
-cloth
-soft pouch
-4GB memory card
-cradle
-preloaded demos
x3sphere said:Memory cards are extremely cheap now, I see no reason they can't include a 4GB. You can pick them up for like $20 now.
StevieP said:Everything except the memory card will come true.
BadWolf said:Highly doubt the inclusion of a memory card and cradle.
staticneuron said:This has been annoying me this generation. People are willing to jump on anything that the hear, they turn around and treat it as the truth without looking into if the company themselves gave out the information.
KAL2006 said:They really need to include a memory card if they are serious about their PSN store. Every Vita game will be downloadable, as well as there being apps, video store, PS Suite and etc. Vita needs to come with a memory card if they are serious about their online. 4GB is perfect, it allows you to download any content from PSN, the biggest file being a 4GB Vita game. So the memory card should fill up fast so Sony can make extra money of bigger capacity memory cards. The just need to be able to let people download something from the store as soon as someone buys a Vita. Also whats the point showing off a 4GB memory card, who would bother buying a 4GB card seperatly, when 8GB ones are not usually that much more expensive anyway. 4GB card is most likely the card that gets packaged with Vita.
Yup, it's annoying when that happens.OldJadedGamer said:At the time, Sony cameras were all shipping with memory stick duos so if you had a camera or any other Sony stick duo you didn't need to buy the value pack but were forced to anyway
This would have never happened if Sony had revealed the RAM size early. I don't know why they chose to hide it though. Nip it in the bud, as they say.staticneuron said:This has been annoying me this generation. People are willing to jump on anything that the hear, they turn around and treat it as the truth without looking into if the company themselves gave out the information.
StevieP said:There won't be any substantially sized card packaged with the Vita at $249, unless they pull another forced "value package" deal at a higher cost.
Meisadragon said:This would have never happened if Sony had revealed the RAM size early. I don't know why they chose to hide it though. Nip it in the bud, as they say.
KAL2006 said:They really need to include a memory card if they are serious about their PSN store. Every Vita game will be downloadable, as well as there being apps, video store, PS Suite and etc. Vita needs to come with a memory card if they are serious about their online. 4GB is perfect, it allows you to download any content from PSN, the biggest file being a 4GB Vita game. So the memory card should fill up fast so Sony can make extra money of bigger capacity memory cards. The just need to be able to let people download something from the store as soon as someone buys a Vita. Also whats the point showing off a 4GB memory card, who would bother buying a 4GB card seperatly, when 8GB ones are not usually that much more expensive anyway. 4GB card is most likely the card that gets packaged with Vita.
No then, people would be claiming that the Vita was going to have 1gig of RAM till Sony gimped it.Meisadragon said:Yup, it's annoying when that happens.
This would have never happened if Sony had revealed the RAM size early. I don't know why they chose to hide it though. Nip it in the bud, as they say.
My idea of portable, in addition to it running from a battery, is me being able to easily transport it around my apartment, and use in my car.AzureNightmare said:Goddamn, this thing's gonna have a battery life shorter than a fruitfly's general life expectancy. It'll be glorious don't get me wrong, but I don't its gonna be exactly "portable" in a manner of speaking.
It would be crazy if there is no memory that comes with the Vita, every device in this day and age comes with at least a little memory, from a 360 Arcade, to a smartphone to even a 3DS.demosthenes said:I really hope this is true.
The current Sony is going back to the pre-ps3 playbook. Can't sell as many proprietary memory cards when you offer built-in or pre-packaged storage.KAL2006 said:It would be crazy if there is no memory that comes with the Vita, every device in this day and age comes with at least a little memory, from a 360 Arcade, to a smartphone to even a 3DS.
H_Prestige said:The current Sony is going back to the pre-ps3 playbook. Can't sell as many proprietary memory cards when you offer built in storage.
I think it's too cost prohibitive for Sony to include the memory card with the WiFi version.KAL2006 said:It would be crazy if there is no memory that comes with the Vita, every device in this day and age comes with at least a little memory, from a 360 Arcade, to a smartphone to even a 3DS.
It should have a memory card, but the size will be very small. I'll be surprised if it doesn't.pharmboy044 said:I think it's too cost prohibitive for Sony to include the memory card with the WiFi version.
OldJadedGamer said:I've tried this and it is super shitty, buffers a lot and stalls for me making the video unwatchable. What I'm saying is that it should be a direct connection from the Vita to my home computer. No PS3 required, if the iPod Touch can do it... the Vita should be able to do it.
Hang on... isn't this the closest thing we've ever had to a statement from Sony asknowledging that cross-game chat on PS3 is impossible/not going to happen?gofreak said:Some talk from Shuhei Yoshida about the RAM.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-08-18-sony-why-ps-vita-has-512mb-of-ram
It's been 5 years, is anyone actually still waiting for it?Pazuzu9 said:Hang on... isn't this the closest thing we've ever had to a statement from Sony asknowledging that cross-game chat on PS3 is impossible/not going to happen?
How hard is it to clarify that one point?
Pazuzu9 said:Hang on... isn't this the closest thing we've ever had to a statement from Sony asknowledging that cross-game chat on PS3 is impossible/not going to happen?
How hard is it to clarify that one point?
Mr_Brit said:It's been 5 years, is anyone actually still waiting for it?
TyRaNtM said:I think that the developers says that the RAM was halved, not because the amount of RAM was halved, they were saying that, because the type of RAM isn't the same type as a console RAM (Vita RAM must be a smartphone like RAM).
So, you can have even a 1GB in RAM, but a console type RAM is better.
In resume, a 512MB Smartphone like RAM is like a 256MB console RAM or worst.
Cross-game chat is the most requested feature on the PlayStation Blog Share. I'm sure they're working on it, since they made a big deal out of the fact that it's available for the Vita. But the thing is, I don't think we'll ever see it on the PS3 because of, I dunno, RAM issues, maybe? These things need to be included during the designing phase of the Console/OS, it's hard to integrate it mid-way during the console's life-cycle, I assume.Pazuzu9 said:Hang on... isn't this the closest thing we've ever had to a statement from Sony asknowledging that cross-game chat on PS3 is impossible/not going to happen?
How hard is it to clarify that one point?