denshuu
Member
My Alienware X51 is crying.
i7, GTX670 in mine. Feels good finally seeing my PC specs in the Ultra column for once.
My Alienware X51 is crying.
Thanks, that's a really useful chart. I like that they tested overclocked configurations, seems more realistic for desktop PC gaming enthusiasts.Don't take that 8 core nonsence too seriously
We already saw with BF4 how i5 works in those 8 threaded next gen games
We pc gamers have been living the good life for a while, running console current gen games at higher res and framerates with affordable rigs. I think things are going to change :/
Interested to see the performance with mantle. Hopefully it is enough of a boost to get over 60 FPS with a bunch of different CPUs.Don't take that 8 core nonsence too seriously
We already saw with BF4 how i5 works in those 8 threaded next gen games
I don't think you should take the absolute performance numbers in that chart too seriously, CPU performance should increase in the final release version compared to a beta. (GPU performance is probably closer to final)Interested to see the performance with mantle. Hopefully it is enough of a boost to get over 60 FPS with a bunch of different CPUs.
Dont need it!People run PCs without HDDs these days? Man you crazy kids.... XD
That rig is not going to last for a long time.
Heh i love seeing the PC specs on these games that are finally built with " Next-Gen " consoles in mind. The jump is obvious. Recommended Specs are more in line with the consoles and the RAM recommended jump seems to be from 512MB on VRAM to 2+GB of VRAM. It is happening.
Now that devs have RAM to work with now, even on consoles, I wouldn't be shocked if 90% of games releasing June 2014 and on, all Recommend 2GB of VRAM on PC, with that number going to 3GB by December 2015.
Nothing but good news there.
The recommended specs are nothing like next gen consoles. The next gen console can barely play these games without a lot of lod and sub 1080 resolutions. These specs are for ultra settings well above 1080 .. Higher texture res and larger lod distances.
Thanks, that's a really useful chart. I like that they tested overclocked configurations, seems more realistic for desktop PC gaming enthusiasts.
Don't take that 8 core nonsence too seriously
We already saw with BF4 how i5 works in those 8 threaded next gen games
The recommended specs are nothing like next gen consoles. The next gen console can barely play these games without a lot of lod and sub 1080 resolutions. These specs are for ultra settings well above 1080 .. Higher texture res and larger lod distances.
Wow, 2500k @4.5 still rocking with the bigger/newer boys.
I think I made a good choice when I bought it.
People should really stop recommending those crappy 500$ rigs to other gaffers, making them think they are going to last a while..
Because it was rumored that PS4 reserves less than 1 core for the OS, and we don't know the final CPU clock speed.
I don't think you should take the absolute performance numbers in that chart too seriously, CPU performance should increase in the final release version compared to a beta. (GPU performance is probably closer to final)
This of course depends on what exactly a beta build entails for DICE.
The recommended specs are nothing like next gen consoles. The next gen console can barely play these games without a lot of lod and sub 1080 resolutions. These specs are for ultra settings well above 1080 .. Higher texture res and larger lod distances.
Take a look at the performance requirements of console ports over the last few years and you'll see why there's nothing unusual about it.The recommended specs are nothing like next gen consoles. The next gen console can barely play these games without a lot of lod and sub 1080 resolutions. These specs are for ultra settings well above 1080 .. Higher texture res and larger lod distances.
Held back is an interesting way to look at things. The fact that many games were created for consoles also allowed for much higher levels of image quality and performance. Games that really pushed PC hardware to its limits would ultimately force PC gamers to give up high framerates and great image quality. Is that what people want?PC games really have been held back due to consoles, unless they are purely PC exclusive. Which is rare.
Take a look at the performance requirements of console ports over the last few years and you'll see why there's nothing unusual about it.
Held back is an interesting way to look at things. The fact that many games were created for consoles also allowed for much higher levels of image quality and performance. Games that really pushed PC hardware to its limits would ultimately force PC gamers to give up high framerates and great image quality. Is that what people want?
AMD processors getting destroyed.
The unlocked i5's are truly the best bang for the buck.
DICE was talking lately about 6 cores in next-gen consoles from what i remember...
Yup. Ready for next gen confirmed.I meet recommended!
recommended specs are not high or ultra, it's standard, medium spec with the possibility on switching on a couple of extra effects if ya rig can handle it, and only the Xbox One has multiple games that are sub 1080 resolutions, Watch Dog hasn't been confirmed for either platform but as AC4 is 1080p WD is highly likely to be the same & BF4 is yet to be confirmed on PS4 too, and lets not forget no one has seen the PC version of WD, and no the reveal trailer isn't representation of the PC version, you should know better then then that.The recommended specs are nothing like next gen consoles. The next gen console can barely play these games without a lot of lod and sub 1080 resolutions. These specs are for ultra settings well above 1080 .. Higher texture res and larger lod distances.
What i'm most interested in is how much harddrive space i'd need for this.
I'm guessing at least 20gb?
.Operating System: Windows Vista (SP2), Windows 7 (SP1) or Windows 8
Note that we only support 64 bit OSs.
DVD-ROM: DVD-ROM Dual Layer
Hard Drive Space: 20 GB
Ah ok Ty
Why does the game need 8gig? Consoles have around 5gig for games in total yet the pc version needs more ram and has graphics memory as well???
I just bought a used Palit oc edition GTX580 3gig as an upgrade from a 1gig GTX460, hope this at least helps!
AMD processors getting destroyed.
The unlocked i5's are truly the best bang for the buck.
Held back is an interesting way to look at things. The fact that many games were created for consoles also allowed for much higher levels of image quality and performance. Games that really pushed PC hardware to its limits would ultimately force PC gamers to give up high framerates and great image quality. Is that what people want?
My last PC build was an i5-3570K. I guess i'm being remiss by not overclocking it?
Black Edition?So where do I stand? I mean, I have a 660 with 2GB of VRAM. Along with 12GBs of DDR3, but my CPU is a FX-6300, hexa core. Where does that put me?
I wanted to hold off OCing my brand new 4670k for awhile but that BF4 chart broke me.
DICE was talking lately about 6 cores in next-gen consoles from what i remember and if Xbone had trouble to reach anything beyond 1.75 with much cooler design than PS4, 2ghz wont gonna happen.
And at least 1 core reservation for OS is quite obvious. So if You really wanna talk about something that is at least could be real, You would talk max about 7 cores and 1.6ghz design.
Heh i love seeing the PC specs on these games that are finally built with " Next-Gen " consoles in mind. The jump is obvious. Recommended Specs are more in line with the consoles and the RAM recommended jump seems to be from 512MB on VRAM to 2+GB of VRAM. It is happening.
Now that devs have RAM to work with now, even on consoles, I wouldn't be shocked if 90% of games releasing June 2014 and on, all Recommend 2GB of VRAM on PC, with that number going to 3GB by December 2015.
Nothing but good news there.
Wow, 2500k @4.5 still rocking with the bigger/newer boys.
I think I made a good choice when I bought it.
there's a list of certain "magic" parts which will be remembered fondly for a generation. the 2500k has earned its place on it.
Except this chart is pretty much a joke. The minimum fps is barely any lower than the average fps, which doesn't correspond with pretty much anyone's beta experience.Don't take that 8 core nonsence too seriously
We already saw with BF4 how i5 works in those 8 threaded next gen games
Wow, 2500k @4.5 still rocking with the bigger/newer boys.
I think I made a good choice when I bought it.