Is that the newstand guy at 2:00? Awesome viral marketing there.shagg_187 said:
shagg_187 said:
shagg_187 said:
Auron_Kale said:Been on a small media blackout (more unintentional than anything) but seeing the stills makes me really happy.
Nite Owl is one of my favorite characters from Watchmen and seeing Patrick Wilson in these shots is great because he looks exactly like Dan Dreiberg.
AlexMogil said:Waaait. Did they publicly mention there was a scientific accident that transformed a man in the comic book?
Ignatz Mouse said:I don't remember, but it's conceivable. He revealed his ID after his father died.
Catalix said:Besides his physique, I think it's his long boyish hair that annoys me the most. I can accept everything else about him, though.
Davidion said:The stills look incredible. Here's to hoping that the movie doesn't piss all over the original story too much...
After the death of Manhattan's father.AlexMogil said:Waaait. Did they publicly mention there was a scientific accident that transformed a man in the comic book?
shagg_187 said:
quadriplegicjon said:it's exactly the same except for the ending.. though i am now hearing that the end might actually be the same and it was all a ruse.
AlexMogil said:Waaait. Did they publicly mention there was a scientific accident that transformed a man in the comic book?
Impressive. I see they've updated the New Frontiersman site too.shagg_187 said:
Truant said:[/B]
Yeah, I've heard some rumors about this, too.
StoOgE said:there is a still from one of the trailers that looks like a giant fucking squid. I was thinking that they might be saving that for the extended cut where they add in the comic, etc though
Pai Pai Master said:Which trailer? I wanna take a closer look if you can point me to it, or if you can post the still.
Fox just gets dibs on any future sequels or spinoffs, which shouldn't even happen to begin with. I believe I read where Warner Bros. gets all proceeds from domestic DVD/BR sales.YYZ said:Doesn't really matter to us, but do you guys think WB got butthurt by Fox in this deal? I guess the bigger deal is that Fox doesn't have distro rights and they're losing rights to the franchise which made me think that they won't get the juicy DVD+BD cuts.
StrikerObi said:Nite Owl looks too awesome. Dreiberg looks fucking super-nerd perfect!
Catalix said:
I've gone from skeptic to totally fucking hyped.shagg_187 said:
A lot of people are getting pretty fired up about the Watchmen movie coming out any year now. This movie is based on the epic superhero graphic novel (comic book series to you) by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons. I read it, and its pretty good. I had some problems with the ending, but Ill save my comments for when the movie comes out.
Anyway, a new image was just released by the producers of the movie, and it shows a picture of Neil Armstrong on the Moon taken by Dr. Manhattan, an ex-human who, through an atomic accident, became a glowing blue being of pure energy:
![]()
Pretty cool, eh? Yeah, but the debunker in me just has to point something out
See the out-of-focus Earth on the left side of the picture? From the Moon, the Earth is about 2 degrees across, roughly four times the size of the Moon as seen from Earth. In the picture you can see the Earth is only a degree or two off the lunar horizon.
But thats wrong! The Moon always shows one face as seen from the Earth, and that means the Earth is always in roughly the same part of the sky from a spot on the Moon. To see the Earth that close to the horizon means the Apollo 11 landing would have to have been very close to the Moons north or south pole (hard to tell which; the features on the Earth are too blurred to get a direction).
However, Apollo 11 landed almost exactly on the Moons Equator. To Buzz and Neil, the Earth was high overhead, difficult to see at all from inside the spacesuits.
Obviously, the Watchmen picture is faked.
[Update: Max Fagin in the comments makes a good point: there is a circle around the Moon where the Earth would be near the horizon, the divider between the near and far side of the Moon. But landing near there would be dangerous; for your first landing you want to be sure you are in direct visual contact with Earth, otherwise you cant communicate. That means landing near the center of the Moons face. Assuming this was Apollo 17 (see below) changes that, but then why would Manhattan be there to take a picture of the 11th or 12th guy on the Moon? I dont buy it.]
A nice touch is the code on the side of the picture: AS17-137-20990. Thats the coding NASA used for the pictures taken on the Moon. But AS17 was used for Apollo 17, not 11. In fact, there is an Apollo picture taken with that code, and its a famous one, showing orange dust on the Moon. The orange color is from tiny glass particles that are volcanic in origin (the story of them finding the orange dust is pretty cool, and you can read about it on the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal).
I dont know if the movie guys put that particular number there on purpose or not, but they screwed up the code.
Im sure if I analyzed the picture more Id find more stuff, but my geekery does have limits. Of course, if someone wants to examine the geometry of Dr. Manhattan holding the camera waist-high and the resulting tilt and angles of the picture, be my guest. Ill just wait for the movie and think its cool either way.
Buttonbasher said:I don't think it's there. It seems like a rumor that people think is true, despite the famed "still" never being posted. If that kind of thing was real, you would know about it by now.
what a bunch of nerdsDrForester said:Movie Fails, not scientifically accurate. Looked like it was going to have a nice run, but don't see how they can recover from this.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/01/22/watchmen-they-need-my-help/
my name is ed said:what a bunch of nerds
awesomeshagg_187 said:March 3rd. Also includes sneak peak at the "prison break" sequence and admission ticket to the movie.
shagg_187 said:2 Things:
1.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/5127oX7V-PL._SS500_.jpg[IMG]
2.
[IMG]http://www.watchmencomicmovie.com/photos/dvd-motion-comic-big.jpg[IMG]
Howza![/QUOTE]
Both pre-ordered. Still waiting for Black Freighter to appear for pre-order.
That's still coming out March 3rd, right?Valkyr Junkie said:Still waiting for Black Freighter to appear for pre-order.
As far as I heard, Yes. Will be announced real soon.Costanza said:That's still coming out March 3rd, right?
Cool, I hope that one gets a BD release too.shagg_187 said:As far as I heard, Yes. Will be announced real soon.
Did they actually spring for more than one voice actor? Otherwise this thing's a ripoff.shagg_187 said:http://www.watchmencomicmovie.com/photos/dvd-motion-comic-big.jpg
Howza!
The Lamonster said::lol
I feel like such a badass now for making my own quality Rorschach costume.
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e212/Jedi631/watchmenhalloween-1.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
Exactly! The few Rorschachs I saw in the last Halloween thread were tons better than those. OMG :lol
Ironic that Ozy is actually the best looking one of the bunch here. Not saying much though :lol