Buttonbasher said:This shirt is a
This is all you need: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0930289234/?tag=neogaf0e-20CoilShot said:I'm not sure if this is the best place to ask this but what book/graphic novel should I start with since I have no knowledge of watchmen?
CoilShot said:I'm not sure if this is the best place to ask this but what book/graphic novel should I start with since I have no knowledge of watchmen?
CoilShot said:I'm not sure if this is the best place to ask this but what book/graphic novel should I start with since I have no knowledge of watchmen?
DanielPlainview said:Another review, kind of poorly written: http://www.geektyrant.com/2009/02/film-review-watchmen-blew-me-away/
Costanza said:This is all you need: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0930289234/?tag=neogaf0e-20
I FORGOT THE NAMES OF THE TWO SILK SPECTRES INCLUDING THE HOT ONE I'M SORRYCatalix said:Rachel? You're all over the place, dude. :lol
Onix said:That one does have the obnoxious bolding though
Cymbal Head said:Any reviews/impressions out yet from people that haven't read the book?
Kastro said:probably the one called watchmen
I was just re-reading it the other day and I didn't realize thatRorsache was the guy holding the sign at the beginning saying "The End Is Nigh" and the detective shudders as he walks by. Awesome
I've always thought of this thread as the official one.DanielPlainview said:Anyone putting together and official Watchmen thread? I would love to, I have alot of time at work.
Also Six Watchmen Collectible Covers From EW
Same here. I think this thread will serve nicely for people that see the movie on a whim. It has a lot of good discussion to sift through.The Lamonster said:I've always thought of this thread as the official one.
Truant said:Minutemen are still in.
Zack refers to the Crimebusters as Crimebusters, although it's been changed in the movie to 'Watchmen' to avoid too much confusion.
Not a big deal for me, personally.
Catalix said:
Buttonbasher said:Same here. I think this thread will serve nicely for people that see the movie on a whim. It has a lot of good discussion to sift through.
Blader5489 said:Seems a bit premature to do a rottenwatch thread, imo.
DanielPlainview said:Maybe just changing the thread title then. I might make a Watchmen review thread, just to get all the reviews in one place/
The Lamonster said:I have that version. I never noticed any bolding.
shrug
I will check when my buddy is finished reading it.Onix said:You don't notice that apparently random words are in bold type? Many times one or two per sentence?
I'll say around 490millionDanielPlainview said:Someone on twitter said they went with someone that never read it and they loved it. So who knows?
Also I listened to /Film's videoblog: How Much Money Will Watchmen Make?
They kinda have no idea what it will make.
I'm going to say 65 million. What do you guys think?
I know a lot of people want to know about Watchmen, so I'll just cut to the chase right away: It's the best movie inspired by a graphic novel that I've ever seen. It could have gone wrong in a thousand different places, and it didn't. I've wanted to see this movie for twenty years, and it was entirely worth the wait. Hear me now, my fellow geeks: you have nothing to worry about. Watchmen is fucking awesome.
DanielPlainview said:Someone on twitter said they went with someone that never read it and they loved it. So who knows?
Also I listened to /Film's videoblog: How Much Money Will Watchmen Make?
They kinda have no idea what it will make.
I'm going to say 65 million. What do you guys think?
awesome!beelzebozo said:the only endorsement that matters:
from Whil Wheaton's blog, "Spoiler Alert: WATCHMEN is fucking awesome"
don't fuck with the crush
DanielPlainview said:Anyone putting together and official Watchmen thread? I would love to, I have alot of time at work.
Also Six Watchmen Collectible Covers From EW
shagg_187 said:I'm already working on it(For both gaming and off-topic).
Lakitu said:$65 Million overall? You're kidding, right?
I'd say $200 Million domestically.
Onix said:You don't notice that apparently random words are in bold type? Many times one or two per sentence?
Kastro said:probably the one called watchmen
I was just re-reading it the other day and I didn't realize thatRorsache was the guy holding the sign at the beginning saying "The End Is Nigh" and the detective shudders as he walks by. Awesome
ChrisGoldstein said:Yeah I'm reading it for the 2nd time and I noticed that as well, blew my mind
-especially when he was at the funeral
Cymbal Head said:That's the only version I've read and I had no idea the bolding wasn't supposed to be there. I was pretty confused at first, cause there didn't seem to be a reason to emphasize those words. :lol
Ignatz Mouse said:One advantage to reading it a chapter at a time with a month wait inbetween was figuring out some of these details. I figured it out when only two issues were out, but I read them many times over.
It bugged at first, but I guess I just tuned it out after a while.Onix said:You don't notice that apparently random words are in bold type? Many times one or two per sentence?
So all that talk about how the version that I own is "inferior" was a lie all along? All versions have annoying bolding? You've owned the originals all these years, so I'm more inclined to believe you.Ignatz Mouse said:I thought all versions had bolding. The original certainly does.
EmPiiRe said:Let's get this out of the way:
6.5/10
First off, the film felt extremely rushed, both in a good way and a bad way; many scenes were so abbreviated and so castrated that there was barely any point in even including them (except to placate fans). The film sometimes felt like a jerrybuilt collection of unconnected scenes; scenes that, in the GN, were interwoven and interconnected are instead disjointed and irrelevant to each other. On their own, many scenes were absolutely fantastic, but the pacing was garbled and occasionally confusing, even to somebody so familiar with the GN.
Dude sounds ridiculously picky. Taken with a huge grain of salt.Catalix said:Temper your expectations, folks. Fan review over on the watchmencomicmovie.com forums.
Seems like a very level-headed guy. He goes into detail on what he loved, liked, and absolutely hated... so beware of spoilers:
http://www.watchmencomicmovie.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2304
He goes into a little more detail by answering people's questions all throughout the thread. It's worth a read.The Lamonster said:Dude sounds ridiculously picky. Taken with a huge grain of salt.
i.e. vague complaints of 'pacing' and 'feels rushed' means absolutely nothing concrete. It'd be like saying 'bad directing.'
Q: Did you feel the rushed pacing was a result of scenes being trimmed and cut for the shorter theatrical runtime or did you get the impression that those are simply the way they were shot? Hmm. To phrase that better: Do you think a Director's Cut would fix the pacing issues?
Scenes being trimmed, for the most part. By boiling down scenes into three or four lines of familiar dialogue, the emotion or purpose behind them is compromised. I believe that the director's cut CAN be a very good movie.
Catalix said:Temper your expectations, folks. Fan review over on the watchmencomicmovie.com forums.
Seems like a very level-headed guy. He goes into detail on what he loved, liked, and absolutely hated... so beware of spoilers:
http://www.watchmencomicmovie.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2304
It's crazy, right? The section we were sweating the most might actually turn out to be one of the film's best assets.Blader5489 said:Reading that, the new ending actually sounds pretty good.