Unorthodox in that it flies in the face of the way we understand nutrition. That doesn't mean its incorrect because its new - thats just a fallacy, but the studies are what they are.
Fair enough - the mortality studies on the diet aren't encouraging. Here's another:
Journal of Internal Medicine
Decreasing carbohydrate or increasing protein intake by one decile were associated with increase in total mortality by 6% (95% CI: 012%) and 2% (95% CI: −1 to 5%), respectively. For cardiovascular mortality, amongst women 4049 years old at enrolment, the corresponding increases were, respectively, 13% (95% CI: −4 to 32%) and 16% (95% CI: 529%), with the additive score being even more predictive.
A diet characterized by low carbohydrate and high protein intake was associated with increased total and particularly cardiovascular mortality amongst women. Vigilance with respect to long-term adherence to such weight control regimes is advisable.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01774.x/abstract
Their data is based on mail delivered surveys
Their data is based on mail delivered surveys
I've put myself on the paleo, with 3 days of exercise/week and there are definitely results.
It sucks not having grain/sugar/legumes/dairy, but I'm managing.
And? The sample size is 42,000 - thats a part of statistics. Most studies of diets rely on people telling the observer what they've eaten, and thats a flaw, but its vastly more credible than people attempting to sell books.
And? The sample size is 42,000 - thats a part of statistics. Most studies of diets rely on people telling the observer what they've eaten, and thats a flaw, but its vastly more credible than people attempting to sell books.
No, it's flawed. Period.
Just because someone is trying to sell a book doesn't necessarily mean they have no argument.
Its only flawed if you are too ridiculous to assess the differences of different types of evidence. No one study proves anything, its about accumulation.
People writing books isn't science, not matter how effective they are at selling their ideas.
Its a huge flaw. There is a poster above you with a larger study that comes to an entirely different conclusion.
Personally, Ill go by my weight, how I feel, and my own personal heart disease risk levels, not inconclusive studies. And you know what? They've all improved since ive been on a high fat lowish carb diet (still eat veggies, fruit and dairy)
Correct, which is why I began stating there is no consensus. If you can comprehend the difference between evidence and a conclusion that may resonate.
Yea, there is no consensus. So why the hell should I not follow a low carb/high fat diet if its working for me and my health indicators are good?
Because it flies in the face of conventional wisdom? I sure hope that isnt what you are saying
That's exactly what he's saying in a roundabout way.
And remember, don't pay attention to ideas from people who are trying to sell books. Instead, buy into the conventional wisdom that was crafted by and large by corporations with an agenda.
There are consensus views in science, that doesn't make them conclusive in the absolute. In fact most things in science aren't conclusive in that sense. That you should adhere to the diet for weight loss and then revert to a more conventional diet is a conservative approach to this stuff.
But now we are into corporate conspiracies and causal research not being real research.
What? The GI for any meat is at the bottom end of the scale.I don't really understand the conclusion. If secreting too much insulin is the problem, wouldn't you want to look at which foods cause you to secrete the most insulin, rather than simply saying "carbs bad"?
Looking at the glycemic index and the insulin index, it appears pasta is not bad. The insulin index for pasta is below the ones for fish, beef, and most fruits.
White bread is more than double the insulin index of pasta. Potatoes are even higher than white bread, they are up there with eating loads of candy bars. Surprisingly, baked beans are nearly as bad as potatoes.
Going by this it seems like eggs and peanuts are really good. Oatmeal, non sugar cereal, pasta, cheese, and meat are ok. Avoid white rice, potatoes, baked beans, and desert at all costs.
I'm still confused by the high scores for most of the fruits though, seems like you should avoid eating a lot of bananas/grapes/watermelon.
Yep...ever noticed how when you have a big mac, you feel full but an hour later you are starving?
What has happened is that your body has used up all the carbs in the bun and salad, stored the fat from the lovely meat (never to be used) and now wants more energy (carbs) to use up what's been burned and will again store all the fat and use the carbs for energy (never to be used).
That's why people get obese. The body craves more and more carbs...it doesn't crave the fat, that just gets stored.
What? The GI for any meat is at the bottom end of the scale.
Yep. Probably 40 carbs of bread on that.To much powdered carb on the chicken.
I hate these idiots insisting you should add more fat into your diet. Hasn't it been made clear enough that excess fat blocks your arteries in the long run? It's healthier to eat some carbs (just cut down your consumption a bit and don't get a huge plateful of rice/potatoes/pasta with your lunch/dinner/whatever) and ordinary amounts of fat than to eat no/very little carbs and replace it all with more fat.
sugar is a carb. its the worst carb you can eat
Veggies are awesome. I think fruit and dairy are perfectly fine. My diet consists of no grain, no sugar, and no processed foods - meaning i eat a lot of fruit and dairy. I like fruit and dairy too much to cut it, and dont feel like i need to to lose/maintain weight
All of this and the addition of vegetable/seed based fats. They are the worst kind and they seem to be included more and more in your typical diet.Dietary fat is not the cause of excess body fat. Before the obesity epidemic, back when there was not fitness craze, aerobics, jogging, and gym memberships, Americans regularly consumed fatty meats, lard, oil, and cheese without a problem. The epidemic only started when the standard American diet and the food pyramid began encouraging consumption of larger quantities of bread, pasta, rice and cereal, and avoid fats.
The fat from meat is also a loose, fluffy type that doesn't block arteries, unlike the dense, heavy kind of fat molecules that arise from carbohydrates > fat conversion. Taubes explains this much better than I can.
This is incorrect. Lettuce provides almost no carbs (near zero). Most of the carbs in the bun are not used unless you very recently exercised or do so right after (unlikely after a carb-heavy meal). The bread causes an insulin spike and two things happen: the body holds on to existing body fat, and the recently consumed carbs are converted to even more fat. I don't exactly recall, but I believe the fat from meat would be quickly used up only if you're in ketosis.
Due to either genetics or age, some people can burn through all or most of the carbs without effort and see no weight gain. But continuous carb consumption will eventually catch up with you. The repeat blood sugar spikes cause insulin resistance, meaning you need more insulin than you previously did to process the same amount of sugar, but in turn also leads to more bodily fat retention (difficult to overcome, ordinary exercise becomes less effective). At the extreme end, you can't make enough insulin and you become diabetic.
Kind of related, but I used to obsessively research which foods were good for general health, not necessarily gaining or losing fat but general health, and the consensus of all the things I read were that eating a ton and a wide of veggies and fruits, as well as beans (which some varieties have the highest number of antioxidants of any food), made people live much much longer. I have no links to back myself up or specific studies to cite, but it was simply obvious looking at all the various evidence around the net.
The epidemic only started when the standard American diet and the food pyramid began encouraging consumption of larger quantities of bread, pasta, rice and cereal, and avoid fats.
You have been talking about insulin spikes, becoming insulin resistant, etc. But then, why wouldn't you use the insulin index to decide which foods were good?
In the same amounts, beef and fish raise insulin more than pasta does. If insulin is the issue why doesn't that mean pasta is ok?
Of course, there may very well be something else bad about carbs but it doesn't seem like it can be reduced purely to insulin.
I was on a low calorie diet for 9 months and lost 70 lbs.
SO...
Isn't cutting carbs dangerous for you?
I was on a low calorie diet for 9 months and lost 70 lbs.
SO...
I was on a low calorie diet for 9 months and lost 70 lbs.
SO...
Teach a person to eat well rounded meals at proper portion sizes and they're set for life.
Take a low carber, switch back to a normal diet and they bloat up very fast usually heavier than before.
You eat larger portions on low carb so your stomach never shrinks making over eating very common if you switch back to normal eating habits.
You can eat lots while doing little on low carb which is why its popular but you really only end up as a lighter version of your fat self.
Watch calories, learn portions and exercise. you'll lose weight, have more energy, gain fitness and not be food restricted. Once you hit your goal maintaining is really easy since you've learnt during the process. It takes more effort than low carb, especially early on, but the results and benefits are far better in the end.
Someone please explain why i'm 120lbs.
Teach a person to eat well rounded meals at proper portion sizes and they're set for life.
Take a low carber, switch back to a normal diet and they bloat up very fast usually heavier than before.
You eat larger portions on low carb so your stomach never shrinks making over eating very common if you switch back to normal eating habits.
You can eat lots while doing little on low carb which is why its popular but you really only end up as a lighter version of your fat self.
Watch calories, learn portions and exercise. you'll lose weight, have more energy, gain fitness and not be food restricted. Once you hit your goal maintaining is really easy since you've learnt during the process. It takes more effort than low carb, especially early on, but the results and benefits are far better in the end.
Welcome to the Hunter/Gatherer club son!
Stopped at "stomach shrinking"
Come on...
I'm pretty sure stomach shrinking is bullshit.
Honestly I'd rather die than give up all legumes and dairy. I can give up a lot of breads, but not peanut butter or cheese. If I was concerned about living the healthiest life possible I'd move up into the mountains where there's absolutely no air pollution.
i'd be so miserable if i didnt eat any carbs.
I'm pretty sure stomach shrinking is bullshit.