Unknown Soldier
Member
Using big text doesn't prove your point, it's just obnoxious.
If this is the one you want, Newegg has a crazy deal on it right now: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod...8PUA&cm_re=OLED65B8PUA-_-89-007-664-_-Product $1699.00Best TV For Gaming: LG B8 - rtings
*drops mic
Technically according to Rtings, the best TV for gaming is the Samsung Q900R, which is an 8k TV, followed by the Vizio P Quantum Series, then 3 LG OLEDs, another Vizo, then the Sony A9 (which is their OLED).
The B8 is gimped for hdr though, last I checked. Just like 2017 oleds. Doesn't have dynamic tone mapping so the image is super dark. If you plan to only game sdr, it's not a bad choice.If this is the one you want, Newegg has a crazy deal on it right now: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod...8PUA&cm_re=OLED65B8PUA-_-89-007-664-_-Product $1699.00
For buying a TV, the best return policy you can get these days is Costco.The B8 is gimped for hdr though, last I checked. Just like 2017 oleds. Doesn't have dynamic tone mapping so the image is super dark. If you plan to only game sdr, it's not a bad choice.
Although I wouldn't buy from third party seller, I don't think newegg has the best return policy
The B8 is gimped for hdr though, last I checked. Just like 2017 oleds. Doesn't have dynamic tone mapping so the image is super dark. If you plan to only game sdr, it's not a bad choice.
Although I wouldn't buy fryom third party seller, I don't think newegg has the best return policy
And another one confirms what I've been saying...Best TV For Gaming: LG B8 - rtings
*drops mic
Technically according to Rtings, the best TV for gaming is the Samsung Q900R, which is an 8k TV, followed by the Vizio P Quantum Series, then 3 LG OLEDs, another Vizo, then the Sony A9 (which is their OLED).
LMAO yeah right. I'm not the one refusing to accept logic and the data.This sounds like cognitive dissonance to me.
No that's not what I'm saying. Firstly, FALD does not necessarily give superior colors. It gives deeper blacks at the cost of having blooming issues and more expensive panels compared to edge-lit. Secondly, FALD does not solve the general issues that LCD displays have. OLED eliminates those completely.So you're saying superior colors matter when it comes to oled vs. Sony fald, but not sony fald compared to a Samsung edge lit.
People feel the difference between a 120Hz monitor (8.3 ms) and a 60 Hz monitor (16.7ms). So there is a difference nonetheless, whether you think it matters or not. And even if you're not someone that is THAT sensitive, you can't look at it linearly. The higher the input lag, the easier it is to detect. It will be hard for everyone to feel the difference between 5 ms and 15 ms. But the same cannot be said for 15ms and 25ms, and definitely not for 25ms and 35ms. Because the higher it is, the more it is within the range of human capability. If someone has an average reaction of 150ms, the difference between seeing something on screen after 165ms and 180 ms is huge.22ish MS lag on the (current) LG oled is "slightly higher" compared to 13ms on one of the current samsungs, but 30ish MS lag on x900e is an "atrocious difference".
Or maybe you simply don't understand. Trust me. As someone who plays fighting games, I could feel the difference of input lag between Dead or Alive 4 and Dead or Alive 5 on the Xbox 360 (same TV). Want to know the difference of input lag between them? ONE FRAME, or, 16.7ms. 20ish ms is close to one frame. 30ish ms is close to two frames. I can live with one frame of lag. 30ish ms is too much.Clearly this arbitrary reasoning you're using is just meant to justify your purchase, but you don't need to do that to be happy with what you have. You're just comparing numbers while greatly exaggerating real use case impact.
No it's not comparable, because all games require input to work. Slower input is a direct impact on the functioning of the game. The better the input the better it feels. Simple as that. Games do not require HDR to be a great experience nor does it interfere with its function.I can apply sour grapes to the x900e vs. a 2017 lg oled as well ; the lcd's higher brightness meant that for hdr, you had better brightness contrast for hdr gaming, if HDR gaming was my highest priority (lol, it's not). But if I did that, that would be comparable to what you're doing here.
Your personal spouting is tiring. I guess that's what one must do when one is out of arguments.Bottom line is, TV's across the board are getting very, very good and there's no need to feel like you're missing out.
Yeah, like I said I haven't kept up with b8 news, but reading a bit it seems firmware updates have caused new issues as well,. If that shit isn't working out of the box I wouldn't bother.The 8s are good on the hdr front, I think you might have it confused with the abl issue a firmware update added which has since been fixed with a later one.
The 7 series hdr is incredibly dim and not worth your money unless you find one that hasn't been updated and super cheap
Yeah good quality high resolution CRT monitors are still great, especially for older games. I still have my 19 inch flat screen Dell CRT in my grandpas basement.... never know when I might wanna hook up my Dreamcast with the VGA cable (probably never).
Yeah i'm in Europe.
I was done with Fake, now I'm done with you too. There's no sense arguing with Sony fanboys.Yeah, like I said I haven't kept up with b8 news, but reading a bit it seems firmware updates have caused new issues as well,. If that shit isn't working out of the box I wouldn't bother.
Ascend youve said you were done before lol. Get a grip.
Fald gives better blacks, but the better sony panels vs. Mid tier sammys give better colors. Local dimming on medium and low cause no noticeable blooming
Also, go back and read if you want, but I never said there was no lag difference. But you're clearly using an arbitrary cut off point to justify a purchase.
Lets see if you're really done here tho lmao.
Dude, you are delusional lol. Believe me, I would be more than happy to game on a 7 series Sammy, they're nice sets for the money.I was done with Fake, now I'm done with you too. There's no sense arguing with Sony fanboys.
Just to confirm what I said earlier;Trust me. As someone who plays fighting games, I could feel the difference of input lag between Dead or Alive 4 and Dead or Alive 5 on the Xbox 360 (same TV). Want to know the difference of input lag between them? ONE FRAME, or, 16.7ms. 20ish ms is close to one frame. 30ish ms is close to two frames. I can live with one frame of lag. 30ish ms is too much.
And no it's not placebo, because I felt it way before I ever saw that video. I can also feel the difference in input lag of DOA6 on Xbox One and DOA6 on PC... You can go try it yourself. There's a free version on all platforms. Come back and tell me you feel no difference between the consoles and PC in terms of input lag. I dare even say that between consoles and PC, this time, the input lag difference is more in the range of 2-3 frames rather than 1 frame.