• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

What some Japanese developers think of NGP/PSP2

Jinfash

needs 2 extra inches
gofreak said:
If the developers in question can actually make online games that are playable on a typical 3g connection, then surely that is A Good Thing?

I am glad that virtually all of them isolated interface and connectivity possibilities as their highlights. That bodes well for differentiation that PSP arguably lacked.
Personally I'm not excited about MP gaming on 3G. As far as I know, it is the most battery-taxing feature on any portable, and unless the "3-5 hours" estimation was made with the 3G in mind (thus ignoring the Wifi only model), I don't think it'll be worth it.
 

Amir0x

Banned
timetokill said:
Nintendo has competition, though. What's the problem?

You need viable competition to force Nintendo to not be a shithead company as they are naturally inclined to be.

PSP only barely made a burp back in Japan, and in the US the thing is shit.

If Nintendo continues to dominate in the handheld space, we'll continue to be held back by their usually cheap-ass decisions. We need alternatives that are viable and at the very least moderately successful. Hell, even given PSP's low status, I do not doubt for a second there were one or two 3DS decisions that were natural responses to some of the PSP's old features.

If NGP is priced as high as some of these people are thinking (and I'm thinking), then it'll be a failure and no one will make games for it and the market will be shackled by Nintendo once more.
 

-KRS-

Member
Gravijah said:
there's always the jun---


hmm

What happened with that btw? Any updates? Has there been a date released?
It's like they had that event last October and then disappeared.
 

Amir0x

Banned
jackdoe said:
I don't know if it's fair to say that the PSP made barely a burp in Japan.

Ok, it made a really big burp. But it is not really heated competition for the DS even in Japan; and it's not a viable worldwide competitor which is just as necessary in being considered a true contender.

If Sony was in charge, they'd need a viable competitor too or they get too big for their bridges. Look what they did with PS3 because they had no viable competitors at the time.

Hell, the 3DS is $250. Iwata said partially this was because they heard fans reaction to the reveal and knew they could charge that much. This is the sort of thing that happens when there are no alternatives. Companies charge more, they make more conservative design decisions, consumers hurt.
 

Spiegel

Member
Amir0x said:
If NGP is priced as high as some of these people are thinking (and I'm thinking), then it'll be a failure and no one will make games for it and the market will be shackled by Nintendo once more.

Did you actually read the op? Most of them are expecting the same price as the 3DS or slightly higher
 
jackdoe said:
I don't know if it's fair to say that the PSP made barely a burp in Japan.
Yeah, the PSP took a while to REALLY take off, but the last couple of years have been a tight race and it even pipped the DS last year. I hope we get this kind of competition from the get go. I am very disappointed with some of the decisions made by Nintendo with the 3DS and on the other hand am pleasantly surprised and impressed by the NGP in general. My only concern is that developers always say stuff when a new hardware is out, let's hope they are really serious about the NGP and not just mouthing off (then again they'd be stupid to since the PSP is quite big in Japan)
 
Amir0x said:
You need viable competition to force Nintendo to not be a shithead company as they are naturally inclined to be.

PSP only barely made a burp back in Japan, and in the US the thing is shit.

If Nintendo continues to dominate in the handheld space, we'll continue to be held back by their usually cheap-ass decisions. We need alternatives that are viable and at the very least moderately successful. Hell, even given PSP's low status, I do not doubt for a second there were one or two 3DS decisions that were natural responses to some of the PSP's old features.

If NGP is priced as high as some of these people are thinking (and I'm thinking), then it'll be a failure and no one will make games for it and the market will be shackled by Nintendo once more.

I think Nintendo just does whatever it wants to do, whether or not they're getting their ass kicked or dominating.

NGP will be $250-300 at launch. Anything beyond that is simply wishful thinking given the highly conservative nature of the device and the hints Sony has dropped about their pricing strategy.
 

jackdoe

Member
Amir0x said:
Ok, it made a really big burp. But it is not really heated competition for the DS even in Japan; and it's not a viable worldwide competitor which is just as necessary in being considered a true contender.

If Sony was in charge, they'd need a viable competitor too or they get too big for their bridges. Look what they did with PS3 because they had no viable competitors at the time.

Hell, the 3DS is $250. Iwata said partially this was because they heard fans reaction to the reveal and knew they could charge that much. This is the sort of thing that happens when there are no alternatives. Companies charge more, they make more conservative design decisions, consumers hurt.
Which is why I hope Sony finds some way to undercut the 3DS. Not likely, but if they did it, it would completely fuck up Nintendo's game plan.
 

Amir0x

Banned
H_Prestige said:
I think Nintendo just does whatever it wants to do, whether or not they're getting their ass kicked or dominating.

NGP will be $250-300 at launch. Anything beyond that is simply wishful thinking given the highly conservative nature of the device and the hints Sony has dropped about their pricing strategy.

highly conservative

wishful thinking if it's more than $300?

Man you have some WEIRD fucking ideas lol
 
Amir0x said:
highly conservative

wishful thinking if it's more than $300?

Man you have some WEIRD fucking ideas lol

The processing cores inside are run of the mill. Every 2011 smartphone/tablet is using the same tech. OLED is nothing unique. What exactly about this device is so out there?
 

Boney

Banned
I wouldn't really worry about it getting support or not. Just don't make those terribad portable nut type of games.
 

Amir0x

Banned
OldJadedGamer said:
Who knows, it' could be $250 with a forced value pack of headphones and a case for $75-$100 dollars more.

We already know it's going to come in two different versions - one with 3G and one without. Not unlikely to see a huge price increase on the 3G version

H_Prestige said:
Every 2011 smartphone/tablet is using the same tech.

False. The rest of your commentary is now clearly fantasy
 

Hellion

Member
Yousuke Hayashi (Tecmo Koei/Team Ninja)
He's interested in the system's specs and online environment.
Until now, they've developed games under the idea that people differentiate between games that are played in the home and on the go. However, in the future, you could be able to continue playing one game on both NGP and PS3.
He'd personally buy the system whatever the price, but as a developer he wants the price to be affordable enough that many players can buy it
Master Ninja style.
 
And even if Sony somehow manages to match 3DS at $250 (which would genuinely shock me), Nintendo will just respond by launching a new $250 bundle SKU including Mario Kart or another big first-party title. There is, in short, little to nothing that Sony could plausibly do pre-launch that would lead Nintendo to see NGP as enough of a threat to justify a price cut or any other drastic changes to its strategy.

If 3DS sales over the course of 2011 or against the NGP launch are underwhelming, then anything could happen. But right now, that doesn't seem too likely.
 
Amir0x said:
We already know it's going to come in two different versions - one with 3G and one without. Not unlikely to see a huge price increase on the 3G version

Right, but with the original PSP they tacked on another $50 bucks in the US and UK if you wanted the extras or not. Who knows if they do the same here to both versions.
 
Amir0x said:
We already know it's going to come in two different versions - one with 3G and one without. Not unlikely to see a huge price increase on the 3G version



False. The rest of your commentary is now clearly fantasy

Ok fine, not every. But extremely common. Iphone/ipad and Galaxy S devices are based on it.
 

gcubed

Member
H_Prestige said:
Ok fine, not every. But extremely common. Iphone/ipad and Galaxy S devices are based on it.

my pentium pro was based on the core i5 i have

a little too extreme probably
 

Gunsmithx

Member
I think the only reason you should see the wifi version not be overpriced is due to the fact they will probably overprice the 3g one. I have a hard time thinking, given sony comments about not having another ps3 situation, that both wifi and 3g ones would be over 300. That said I think the 3g will be 350+ easy, the question will be if you can get a subsided one from a carrier.
 
Amir0x said:
You need viable competition to force Nintendo to not be a shithead company as they are naturally inclined to be.

PSP only barely made a burp back in Japan, and in the US the thing is shit.

If Nintendo continues to dominate in the handheld space, we'll continue to be held back by their usually cheap-ass decisions. We need alternatives that are viable and at the very least moderately successful. Hell, even given PSP's low status, I do not doubt for a second there were one or two 3DS decisions that were natural responses to some of the PSP's old features.

If NGP is priced as high as some of these people are thinking (and I'm thinking), then it'll be a failure and no one will make games for it and the market will be shackled by Nintendo once more.

The PSP did pretty well in Japan, at least, and Japan is what informs most of Nintendo's decisions (sometimes unfortunately). That said, Sony is not really Nintendo's only competition.

And with that in mind, I don't really see how the handheld space was "shackled" at all by the Nintendo DS. It did a lot of inventive things and expanded the space, as well as provided one of the best gaming libraries of all time. What's the issue?
 
It's interesting to see how much support the NGP appears to be getting from Japanese developers, though it's not unexpected. But I think that it will be a different situation in the US, where most people prefer console games. I'm personally a portable fan, but the fact is that many people in America want to sit down and play games on a big screen. The NGP has some amazing features and I can see it doing very well overseas, but will Western developers want to put the time and money into developing console-level titles for a system with a different/smaller userbase? With multiplatform titles, the majority of consumers will gravitate towards the console versions anyway. I believe I've heard a bit of talk about certain publishers avoiding the console for similar reasons.

I guess what I'm getting at is that it would be interesting to see western devs' comments on the matter and how they'd compare/contrast
 
gcubed said:
my pentium pro was based on the core i5 i have

You really think taking an iphone 5 and adding 2 extra cores is the same difference?

Ok fine, you can all continue the fantasy. NGP will cost $350-500 at launch and will be sold at a loss. There is simply too much tech stuffed in there.
 

jhawk6

Member
H_Prestige said:
I think Nintendo just does whatever it wants to do, whether or not they're getting their ass kicked or dominating.

NGP will be $250-300 at launch. Anything beyond that is simply wishful thinking given the highly conservative nature of the device and the hints Sony has dropped about their pricing strategy.


Yeah, no real shot of $250 for NGP. I'm thinking north of $350
 

Snakeyes

Member
Yeah, I'll wait until some actual games come out of all this enthusiasm. Sorry for the pessimistic outlook but devs say stuff like that all the time, especially if the platform maker has given them a little incentive to do so on the side.

Kojima on 3DS: "I've been waiting all my life for a system this powerful."

Riiiight...
 

Amir0x

Banned
timetokill said:
The PSP did pretty well in Japan, at least, and Japan is what informs most of Nintendo's decisions (sometimes unfortunately). That said, Sony is not really Nintendo's only competition.

And with that in mind, I don't really see how the handheld space was "shackled" at all by the Nintendo DS. It did a lot of inventive things and expanded the space, as well as provided one of the best gaming libraries of all time. What's the issue?

It held back handheld gaming technology by over six years; all the biggest games went to its N64-era crapware technology and all 3D games that came to the platform unanimously and without exception suffered for it. Other features, such as online functionality, were also complete fucking terrible.
 

AAK

Member
You guys realize that thing operates via an OLED screen with a Quad-core processor in it right? Knowing that how the heck can not be in the smartphone range of prices.
 

RurouniZel

Asks questions so Ezalc doesn't have to
Seriously, if they want the NGP to be successful in the West, the absolute best thing they could do would be to include an HDMI out on the system so that all games could be outputted to an HD television.

Granted, it'd have to be a long cord for that to be comfortable...
 
RurouniZel said:
Seriously, if they want the NGP to be successful in the West, the absolute best thing they could do would be to include an HDMI out on the system so that all games could be outputted to an HD television.

Granted, it'd have to be a long cord for that to be comfortable...

Lack of hdmi isn't going to make or break this thing.

And for all we know maybe Sony didn't include it because they would rather sell an optional dock with hdmi out ;)
 
Ezalc said:
So what do the good Japanese developers say?

Zing!

Cyberconnect2 is good...surely you didnt miss the greatest game of this generation that they released, the phenomenally epically awesome Naruto Shippuden Ultimate Ninja Storm 2! Im ready for them to work their Naruto Shippuden wonders on the NGP...surely one of the main reasons why Im gonna get this device on Day 1, just as an investment for a gloriously bright Naruto future! Dattebayo!
 

StevieP

Banned
Because selling the system at a loss worked so well for Sony's bookkeepers when it came to the PS3. They're still suffering for that.
 
StevieP said:
Because selling the system at a loss worked so well for Sony's bookkeepers when it came to the PS3. They're still suffering for that.

No it didn't work out so well for the ps3. But it didn't cause any problems for the ps1, the ps2, or the psp. The ps3 was a poorly managed disaster.
 
H_Prestige said:
Ok fine, you can all continue the fantasy. NGP will cost $350-500 at launch and will be sold at a loss.

This strawman position is absurd, yes, but your certainty in your lowballed estimate is also pretty absurd.

It's true that the NGP utilizes well-understood mobile phone technology in order to keep costs down. It's also true that it's using tech that's ahead of the standard mobile curve, partially in order to hedge against obsolescence for as long as possible: quad-cores are not currently planned for general release for either the CPU or GPU architecture used by the NGP until 2012, for example. Similarly, it has a similar overall build approach to a mobile phone, but as a dedicated gaming system it will incur costs that don't follow for such general-purpose devices -- a game system will generally utilize much faster (and more expensive) RAM configurations, for example.

A lot of people have suggested a device that can be sold at launch for $300-350 at somewhere between a tiny profit and a moderate but not extreme loss, and I think that's what we're looking at. The benefits of the mobile-esque architecture are really going to come in a year or two down the line, when Sony will be able to reduce the cost (and therefore, either boost the profit margin or chop the price) of the device very quickly as its parts hit mass adoption.

StevieP said:
Because selling the system at a loss worked so well for Sony's bookkeepers when it came to the PS3.

It worked out great for the PS1 and PS2. The problem with the PS3 was how expensive it was to the consumer, how huge the loss they were taking on it was (something like $250 right at launch), and what a bad price-dropping roadmap they had in place (so they couldn't turn that high launch price around without taking even more huge losses.) Launching a system at something like a $30 loss at launch and aggressively cost-reducing the internals so in a year you're selling it at a profit is still a feasible model, just not the swing-for-the-rafters approach.
 

Boney

Banned
Amir0x said:
It held back handheld gaming technology by over six years; all the biggest games went to its N64-era crapware technology and all 3D games that came to the platform unanimously and without exception suffered for it. Other features, such as online functionality, were also complete fucking terrible.
That's your view on the DS legacy? Or like one example of the bad..
 

Gvaz

Banned
crazy monkey said:
34800 is $425 29800 is $363
For that matter I wouldn't pay any more than $200 so I guess I'm not the market for this little toy.

Too bad too because I might have bought it if it was more useful than the PSP (Got that, disappointed with it) :(
 
I can only imagine what would happen if this thing came in at $400.
I can also imagine what would happen if it came in at $299 or under.

Its like the difference between rainbows and sewage.
 
Amir0x said:
It held back handheld gaming technology by over six years; all the biggest games went to its N64-era crapware technology and all 3D games that came to the platform unanimously and without exception suffered for it. Other features, such as online functionality, were also complete fucking terrible.

It held back gaming technology by introducing different play methods through touchscreen technology? How about the two-screens model, which allowed for interesting new mechanics? The touchscreen was a vital change to the gaming handheld model.

Nintendo's choices as far as graphics hardware also led to a battery life that dwarfed the competition's, which until the 3DS was always Nintendo's methodology, and a huge part of why Nintendo's handhelds came out on top. Your personal tastes might be for cutting-edge graphics, but most consumers would rather have a reasonable battery life. It's unfortunate that neither handheld will have that next generation, at least until potential new models come out.
 

jeremy1456

Junior Member
Amir0x said:
It held back handheld gaming technology by over six years; all the biggest games went to its N64-era crapware technology and all 3D games that came to the platform unanimously and without exception suffered for it. Other features, such as online functionality, were also complete fucking terrible.

So if you really believe that then why did you encourage it by purchasing the system?

Do you just go out and purposefully buy things that you obviously hate?
 
I don't buy it.

Japanese developers largely ignored the online play of the PSP, I doubt they'll change their tune with PSP2.

In fairness, most developers ignored online play for the PSP despite it launching with some amazing Western online games. Then the console just got ignored completely in the West. :\

Hey Akari Uchida, you know what those touch pads would be great for?

Rumble Roses! :3
 
StevieP said:
Because selling the system at a loss worked so well for Sony's bookkeepers when it came to the PS3. They're still suffering for that.

They sold the PS3 for a loss of $400 early on by some estimates. That was ludicrous.

A loss of $70 or so on each system sold can be recouped pretty easily though.
 
H_Prestige said:
The PSP's network capabilities were pretty weak. No proper PSN integration and only WiFi B.

I'm still not counting on hardware / software improvements changing the minds of Japanese developers.

It's going to be interesting to see. As of now I'm not remotely interested in what the PSP2 has to offer in terms of software; but in fairness we don't know entirely what's coming. Just a lot of uninspired ports / side quests of PS3 shovelware. :\
 

Why For?

Banned
I can totally see this thing costing at LEAST $499AU.

I mean the PSPGo released at $449 here. I'm thinking it'll actually hit closer to $599AU which would be incredibly lolworthy.
 
Top Bottom