greencoder
Member
On PC, of course.
So you americans don't call it Full HD?Europe with its retarded Full HD moniker lol. Whats 4K then? Fuller HD? Its like the Full House comeback.
Thank you'll. I thought it was around 2012.
So you americans don't call it Full HD?
Remember "HD ready"?I am European, lol. I don't think I ever see Americans use the phase.
on consoles yeah....beginning of last gen.
768p master raceRemember "HD ready"?
Around 8-10 years ago? It's still used by most users according to Steam's statistics.On PC, of course.
Sadly 1080p still isn't the standard for consoles but we're pushing 4k/faux-k and RT.
Gimmme dem bells and whistles, competent AI, physics and destruction before you nudge up my res.
Sadly 1080p still isn't the standard for consoles but we're pushing 4k/faux-k and RT.
Gimmme dem bells and whistles, competent AI, physics and destruction before you nudge up my res.
Gosh darn laptop users!I guess your best bet is just to look at steam surveys on the Wayback Machine. For example the most popular resolution was
2011 January 1680x1050 https://web.archive.org/web/20110210112400/http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/
2011 April 1920x1080 https://web.archive.org/web/20110515095236/http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/
So according to Steam anyway at some point in 2011 between January and April 1920x1080 started to become the most popular resolution.
It's not even close according to Steam:I'd say 1440 is or is becoming the standard right now. 4k just isnt worth it imo.
crazyIt's not even close according to Steam:
- 1920 x 1080 - 65.67%
- 1366 x 768 - 9.14%
- 2560 x 1440 - 6.75%
- 1440 x 900 - 2.99%
- 1600 x 900 - 2.31%
- 3840 x 2160 - 2.30%
- 1680 x 1050 - 1.73%
There is still quite a big price difference between 1080p and 1440p gaming monitors. in the UK the cheapest 1440/144 monitor is about £300 compared to 1080/144 at £150.crazy
On PS4 in 2013 pretty much, save for the odd game. And then the 4K push happened rather quickly after it. On PC for much longer, I think during the 360 gen.
Europe with its retarded Full HD moniker lol. Whats 4K then? Fuller HD? Its like the Full House comeback.
This exactly. PC gamers require 60fps minimum and until recently 4k60 was not really viable for the majority of games. As 4k60 becomes more standard (on PC) more people will start adopting. Many have made the half way move at 1440p.According to Steam, almost 70% of users still use 1080p as their primary display resolution (Link).
I have two 1440p screens on my PC and love them (I was an early adopter). The resolution is a pretty big deal though as it allows people to get away with a lower-tiered GPU. Wouldn't surprise me in the least if it becomes much more popular, although I don't think it will overtake standard 16:9 aspect ratios as the most popular.
While true, I personally own a 1080p144 screen (and a 4k60fps), not gonna buy a 1440p, I jsut want to skip that resolution fully. I'm getting a new PC right now and I will have 2 options - to play at 4k60 or at 1080p144, max details of course, I think it's a good balance. So yeah, owning a 1080p screen doesn't mean low tier hardware, since high refresh rate screens exist (and my friend has a 1080p240 screen too).According to Steam, almost 70% of users still use 1080p as their primary display resolution (Link).
I have two 1440p screens on my PC and love them (I was an early adopter). The resolution is a pretty big deal though as it allows people to get away with a lower-tiered GPU. Wouldn't surprise me in the least if it becomes much more popular, although I don't think it will overtake standard 16:9 aspect ratios as the most popular.
People way off with the dates. When 360 launched in 2005 at 720p, Many PC gamers were already playing at 1080p. Sure it wasnt all PC gamers, but mid to high end rigs were playing at 1080p.
Its not crazy really. The vast majority of PC gamers view 60fps as console gamers view 30fps, as in its the minimum they will accept. high refresh montiors are prevelant, and the VAST majority of PC gamers play at 60+fps.crazy
Yes most monitors back then were 4/3, but you get what i meant.Back then I think a lot of people actually had a 16:10 monitor, something like 1680x1050
I think the TV industry basically just led to the market getting swamped with panels in 16:9 format.
1440p is nowhere close to 1080p on PC. 1080p is like 10x more popular then 1440p at least according to steam stats. 4K will be much more popular in more artistic circles like design and photography than even 1440p.I'd say 1440 is or is becoming the standard right now. 4k just isnt worth it imo.
As much as I love 1440p for gaming, I don't like anything but 16:9 ratio for anything else. There are some games also I prefer in 16:9. It is a bit of a trade-off so I understand fully.While true, I personally own a 1080p144 screen (and a 4k60fps), not gonna buy a 1440p, I jsut want to skip that resolution fully. I'm getting a new PC right now and I will have 2 options - to play at 4k60 or at 1080p144, max details of course, I think it's a good balance. So yeah, owning a 1080p screen doesn't mean low tier hardware, since high refresh rate screens exist (and my friend has a 1080p240 screen too).
When 1080p monitors became affordable and lower resolution monitors started to become phased out.
1440p is about to become the new 1080p.