• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Who's life would you rather? Stan Lee vs. Hugh Hefner

Status
Not open for further replies.

Switters

Member
Stan Lee. So I can get rid of Spider Man.

Some would argue that Spider Man was the best it ever was under Lee's control. It wasn't until the 90's that petey and crew started sucking.

This is such a slanted poll. It's like asking if you'd rather be George Clooney or Rush Limbaugh. A real catch 22 poll should be if you'd rather be Stan Lee or a paralyzed Larry Flynt. Then you could make some pro vs. con comparisons. But to answer the poll in its present form: Hef all the way.

Two huge contemporaries that had an amazing impact on our world is slanted? Your dick is slanted.

Why so many people in here gotta be so full of shit? C'mon just stop. You don't have to prove anything to us. It's Heff and you know it.

LOL. Wrassle/Sports-GAFfers are my favorite joke accounts.
 

pirata

Member
Well, since I'm gay, I'd have to go with Stan. Also, from the little I've gleaned of Hugh, he seems a tad creepy.
 
To have played a role in creating a collection of characters and worlds that excite the imagination of kids and adults the world over for more than 50 years?

Stan Lee. Without question.
 

andthebeatgoeson

Junior Member
A lifetime of pussy isn't worth the experimentation. I'm not taking a dick up my ass for anything. Nor am I going to suck a dick. Do I have to take all of their life? Can I just delete some parts? Shannon Tweed and the rest of those bunnies are tempting but I have to draw a line.
 
Like Stan Lee couldn't pull tail over the years, yeah right. Hugh drowns in it though.

Stan made an entire generation believe they could be superheroes. Hugh helped millions of young boys realize they'd become young men.

Both a noble profession.

Still, I'd pick Stan Lee. Hugh didn't invent women. Plus I'd rather visit the Playboy Mansion than live there. Must get awfully loud with all the fake screams.
 
I wouldn't want to be Stan Lee because his creations and accomplishments are not my own. Becoming him wouldn't actually mean anything.

On the other hand, getting to plow S-grade vag all day erry day while living life in the swag lane is a more universal concept.
 
Some arsehole who coerced women into bed on the basis he would exploit them as wank-fodder for sad lonely men? Yeah, fuck that. I've some morals.
 
hughhef.jpg


I dunno. Hugh looks kind of morose and tired of all the fast women and sexy parties.

Maybe he wishes deep down inside that he could trade it all in for the life of a comic book writer.
 

xenist

Member
Hefner of course. Is this a serious question? Besides all the banging, he is one of the major motivators for social change of the 20th century.

The ones choosing Lee should hang their heads in shame and fuckin' educate themselves.
 

CorvoSol

Member
That's a little *ahem* naive. The internet is full of free digitized comics. Sad but true and the industry has taken a hit because of it. As a future publisher myself, I find this worrisome.

See, I know that, but it isn't anywhere near as devastating as free porn is to Heff's industry. And amateur webcomics are less than a threat because the good ones never update and the bad ones are awful. That only leaves what, the pirated ones? Everything's pirated online now, so all the hits all the industries take cancel out.
 

charsace

Member
Stan Lee is an influential comic book publisher and has a reputation among art students.

Hugh is the publisher of the world's most popular mens magazine. And he gets to hump a lot of beautiful women.

TOUGH CHOICE.

Lee is loved by fans. People that have worked with him don't talk as warmly about him.
 

Switters

Member
I must apologize to GAY and GIRL GAF for not really providing them a dog in this fight. My next battle will be all inclusive. Amelia Earheart vs. Adam Lambert.

ZvsIj.jpg
VS
ctEBX.jpg


I find it really surprising that people don't understand why some people would rather have lived Stan's life, or it should be such an obvious answer.
 
To have played a role in creating a collection of characters and worlds that excite the imagination of kids and adults the world over for more than 50 years?

Stan Lee. Without question.

I honestly thought you were going to go with Hugh after that first sentence.
 

poisonelf

Member
100% Stan Lee.

I have no desire whatsoever to be drowned by adult-business women who mostly dislike me but need me for promotion and cash, rub shoulders with the decadent elites in private parties etc. It actually bores me and disgusts me as a thought.

Being a legend among people who truly love my creations (not just satisfy lust, not the same thing for me at least), creating entire sub-cultures, living through imagination and being paid shit loads for it... yeah I'd prefer that. And I really, really don't think Stan had any shortage of pretty girls.
 
I find it really surprising that people don't understand why some people would rather have lived Stan's life, or it should be such an obvious answer.

I don't need tons of women, just one good one. And I can only imagine the thrill of seeing some kid wearing a shirt of, or pretending to be, some character you had a hand in creating. To see how many people get joy from it, to possibly be somewhat responsible for someone to believe in heroes. To me, that would be amazing. I wish I could experience something like that.

I honestly thought you were going to go with Hugh after that first sentence.

I actually thought of that while I was typing, but I had to answer honestly. Would have been funny though.
 

Suairyu

Banned
Stan Lee over Hugh Heffner any day. What has Hugh Heffner really created besides a popular porn magazine? I guess that's nothing to be ashamed of really and is a pretty great accomplishment when you look at the entirety of the run and the brand, but compared to aiding in the creation of some of the most beloved characters that will live on far past my lifetime, it's pretty pathetic.
Playboy has done much more than just the centrefold.

OP called Stan Lee a cultural pioneer. That description is much more apt for the Heff. Roger Ebert says it better than I:

Ebert said:
His credentials in these areas have cost him some money and trouble. His syndicated TV program "Playboy After Dark," which he owned and controlled, showcased mixed-race singing groups and blacklisted performers like Pete Seeger at a time when networks enforced a ban on both. It also showed black and whites dancing together on a set supposed to be "Hef's Penthouse." Some stations in the south refused to carry it. The show went on the air not long after Nat King Cole's show left NBC after failing to find advertisers who would buy into a "black" show.

In New Orleans, Hefner franchised one of the first Playboy Clubs, later to learn it was forbidden by law to mix black and white patrons. He bought back the franchise, and reopened it to club members of all races. It was in that club that a black comedian performed before whites for the first time in Louisiana (although black musicians were "legal"). He was a young man from Chicago named Dick Gregory. Gregory appears in the film, recalling that he was a replacement for a white comic, Dr. Irwin Corey, and the Playboy event turned out to be a private party for 300 white businessmen. "Three hours later, I was still talking," Gregory says. "Everything turned around on that day." For his career, it certainly did.

It became a old joke that people said they read Playboy because of the articles. But Hefner tried much harder than necessary to maintain a high editorial standard. His issues #2 through #4 serialized Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451. He championed Vladimir Nabokov, Margaret Atwood, James Baldwin and Jorge Luis Borges. His Playboy Interviews were newsworthy, and his editors must have smiled when they sent Alex Haley to interview the American Nazi George Lincoln Rockwell. (Haley recalls, "I told him I'd been called 'nigger' many times, but this time I was being well paid to hear it.") "The Hurt Locker" was based on Playboy reporting.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/10/entertainment_for_men.html
 

Switters

Member
Playboy has done much more than just the centrefold.

OP called Stan Lee a cultural pioneer. That description is much more apt for the Heff. Roger Ebert says it better than I.

Well shit. Thanks for the info. One doesn't imagine a man with that image to do anything but philander around. Marvel comics did a hell of a lot to push the envelope too, let's not forget.

Hugh Hefner. He was less damaging to the culture of America.

C'mon son.
 

Suairyu

Banned
Well shit. Thanks for the info. One doesn't imagine a man with that image to do anything but philander around. Marvel comics did a hell of a lot to push the envelope too, let's not forget.
Oh, I don't forget; I just didn't like the way you laid it out in the OP. In terms of positively influencing Western culture, I would argue it's Hef who did the most.
 

enzo_gt

tagged by Blackace
Hugh Hefner's life and Stan Lee's legacy.
Basically, Hef when he was young. Make some better decisions later in life and bam easily better choice.

Basically a choice of two comparable cultural icons in magnitude only one gets 1000x more pussy.
 
Pussy or comic nerds?


Pussy.

how is it even a debate.


100% Stan Lee.

I have no desire whatsoever to be drowned by adult-business women who mostly dislike me but need me for promotion and cash, rub shoulders with the decadent elites in private parties etc. It actually bores me and disgusts me as a thought.

Being a legend among people who truly love my creations (not just satisfy lust, not the same thing for me at least), creating entire sub-cultures, living through imagination and being paid shit loads for it... yeah I'd prefer that. And I really, really don't think Stan had any shortage of pretty girls.
LOL!

virgins b easy to spot.
 

poisonelf

Member
how is it even a debate.



LOL!

virgins b easy to spot.

Really? For a moment there I literally thought I was looking at a different forum and got my tabs mixed up.

What's with some responses here, trying to prove you're 'true to yourself' by worshiping an icon of materialistic decadence and celebrity-world bullshit? Being hip and cool? I guess that's what we're supposed to aspire to.
Yeah I hate his style and all that type of society. I despise it actually, just looking at them annoys me.

Also, for the record, I'm 35, in 7-year long relationship soon to be married, and have also been through a younger (stupid) near-engagement and a bunch of casual relationships.

Perhaps the virgins here can be spotted as they're the ones going crazy over the imaginary chance of being around playmates?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom