• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Why are Marvel's Superheroines Less Popular than DC?

Let's not forget on D.C. Side the all female team (usually) birds of prey has had a few successful runs though never huge, I can't think of a marvel equivalent. To a lesser extent Gotham city sirens had a decent run.

A-Force was an attempt at an all female Avengers squad which fizzled. I think there was a Heroes for Hire book at some point with a mostly female team.
 
Marvel is misogynistic too. Ironman was a complete nobody but is now the biggest super hero movie brand. Thor is similar. You get the point. Marvel never believed in women but gave nobody brands a huge fucking chance.

This is an extreme point to take. They have A lot of women in their roster, they just have had less success when trying to push them as solo series characters. They do some good female led book (Widow, Electra and Scarlet Witch are recent ones)- but people don't always seem to respond; Mockingbird and A-Force for example.

Marvel isn't the strongest with pushing their women, but a lot of their characters originated and work well in a team dynamic in general so they've never really been developed from the ground up- Sue Storm, one of the oldest they have, and her role in the 4 is integral; but on her own, she's less engaging, much like the rest of the Four. Women play prominent roles in nearly all of their major team series. Right now Khan's Ms. Marvel (and Jessica Jones to a degree) is the closest thing they've had to a brand new woman in a long time.

Conversely, DC has a lot of what was initially gender flipped versions of their male heroes (even their independent Wonder Woman was basically 3rd string to the "big strong men" for a long long time), but they all got their own fleshed out backstories and became their own characters that stood apart over a long time.

Danvers gets so much flack because she's one of their least interesting characters, but I guess the response to her repeated solo books is enough that marvel keeps trying, in the past when they've attempted they usually end the book after sales are stagnant.
 
I think besides not having too big a push in the comics, they haven't been featured all that much outside of them. Look at how much Black Widow's popularity jumped after being in the movies. Even in cartoons before then, there hasn't been too much representation or focus on the female characters outside of X-Men. Meanwhile you have Batgirl being established in the mainstream since the 60's TV show along with Catwoman and being a staple since, Wonder Woman getting her own live action show in the 70's and being a main member on Superfriends, Supergirl had her own movie even if it was mostly forgotten, Harley Quinn getting a big focus in both cartoons and comics since being introduced. So on so forth. Hard to say that about many Marvel females (again, outside of X-Men). Outside of the relatively better representation push of the last 10 years or so, what other multimedia Marvel superhero females are there with decent representation? Invisible Woman I guess?
 
Let get one thing straight : Next to tv and movies, NOBODY reads comics.

So the easiest way for characters to be popular is to appear outside of comics, like a 70's tv show or a CBS/CW tv show with a cute actress in the main role.

X-men aside, Quake, Elektra and Jessica Jones are probably the most famous Marvel heroines because well .. they appeared outside of comics =P

She Hulk, Squirrel Girl, SpiderGwen and Kamala have HUGE potential for movies, specially because they tap into genres ignored by the superhero genre, like court dramas and YA Women
 
DC's female superheroes and villains are icons and Marvel's aren't? I give the DCAU a lot of credit but I give it a lot of credit for a lot of things.

Ha the point of this thread, I hope could have worded it poorly is to find out why. Like I accept DC's is more well-known, but why is that.
 
The two movies she's been in, she's only said 5 minutes of material each?

She's also a pretty straightforward "levitation" character. Her actual powers make her somebody that can alter probability or reality (much like Domino, whose mutation can influence "luck").

Basically at her full extent she would've curb stomped Tony's team on her own.

But they also nerfed Gamora and Drax hardcore.
 
Thank God you said animated. It's funny how a popular characters like Harley Quinn/X-23 can come from a cartoon but modern Marvel doesn't take advantage of the medium.

Clearly someone isn't watching Avengers Assemble!

Avengers-Secret-Wars-TV-Artwork.jpg
 
Thank God you said animated. It's funny how a popular characters like Harley Quinn/X-23 can come from a cartoon but modern Marvel doesn't take advantage of the medium.

It's one of the BIG advantages DC has had for years due to their partnership with WB animation. You'd think Disney would now provide the same access to quality animation but nope. Disney don't care.
 
Its pretty simple, I think. They haven't pushed them in the MCU yet.

I mean, think about it this way, if you ask the average person to name a female superhero from Marvel they'd say 'Black Widow', she's currently their most famous superhero to a mass audience.

Now, for perspective: DC is only really massively popular in the US. Outside of the US people know who they are, sure, and know Batman and Superman but growing up in the UK it was always Marvel that was the most famous and everyone wanted to be (anecdotal, I know), that's why if you look at the sales data for superhero merch, Spider-Man is massive abroad even compared to Superman and Batman. I know who Wonder Woman is but I really have no relationship or understanding of her beyond the basics. That's changed now that the movie is out.

Marvel has great Super-heroines, I'm sure, but they've yet to push them in the MCU, the series which is undoubtedly the vehicle for making even unknown superheroes household names.

Harley Quinn's popularity after Suicide Squad still alludes me though, no idea how that happened.

Simple:

Harley was already popular before Suicide Squad.
 
She's also a pretty straightforward "levitation" character. Her actual powers make her somebody that can alter probability or reality (much like Domino, whose mutation can influence "luck").

Basically at her full extent she would've curb stomped Tony's team on her own.

But they also nerfed Gamora and Drax hardcore.

Somebody else more knowledgable will have to chime in, but I'm not sure how powerful Scarlet Witch was in her early appearances. I'm much more familiar with her modern power set which is the full blown reality warping but I'm not sure if that's always been the case or if her powers have always been as game breaking as her contemporary power set.
 
It's one of the BIG advantages DC has had for years due to their partnership with WB animation. You'd think Disney would now provide the same access to quality animation but nope. Disney don't care.

The irony is Marvel does and has had more shows airing than DC for about 5 years now

At most DC has had 2 shows at a time
GLTAS/Young Justice
Teen Titans Go/Beware the Batman
Teen Titans Go/JLA

Whereas Marvel has had 3-4
Avengers EMH/Ultimate Spider-man
Avengers Assemble/Ultimate Spidey/Hulk Agents of Smash
Avengers Assemble/Ult Spidey/GoTG
Avengers Assemble/Spider-man/GoTG
 
She Hulk, Squirrel Girl, SpiderGwen and Kamala have HUGE potential for movies, specially because they tap into genres ignored by the superhero genre, like court dramas and YA Women

Squirrel Girl is getting a Freefrom TV show (with others), the She Hulk rights lie with Universal, Spider Gwen is with Sony and God knows when they will get to her and Kamala would require a complete and total change of the character and her origin story.
 
The irony is Marvel does and has had more shows airing than DC for about 5 years now

At most DC has had 2 shows at a time
GLTAS/Young Justice
Teen Titans Go/Beware the Batman
Teen Titans Go/JLA

Whereas Marvel has had 3-4
Avengers EMH/Ultimate Spider-man
Avengers Assemble/Ultimate Spidey/Hulk Agents of Smash
Avengers Assemble/Ult Spidey/GoTG
Avengers Assemble/Spider-man/GoTG

They just mostly suck :-(

We haven't had a good animated Marvel show since EMH
 
I don't remmeber Marvel having anything animated in the last 40 years that had a female superhero as a main character. They might have, but it wasn't noteworthy.

Meanwhile DC has had Super Friends and the DCAU. Barbara Gordon got a big boost in popularity thanks to Batman: The Animated Series.
 
The irony is Marvel does and has had more shows airing than DC for about 5 years now

At most DC has had 2 shows at a time
GLTAS/Young Justice
Teen Titans Go/Beware the Batman
Teen Titans Go/JLA

Whereas Marvel has had 3-4
Avengers EMH/Ultimate Spider-man
Avengers Assemble/Ultimate Spidey/Hulk Agents of Smash
Avengers Assemble/Ult Spidey/GoTG
Avengers Assemble/Spider-man/GoTG

Problem is, only EMH was worth writing home about.

I don't understand why they can't get animation right. Throw enough money at the creators involved to get a premium product.
 
Simple:

Harley was already popular before Suicide Squad.

Yep. She was the #1 Halloween costume in 2015, a year before Suicide Squad came out. It was primarily the SS version, but you know something is hot when people are dressing up as a character a year out from the movie.

Wonder Woman, Batgirl, Poison Ivy, Catwoman, and Supergirl are the same way. You can sell costumes and merchandise for them anytime, they don't need a corresponding TV show or film to sell that stuff.
 
Clearly someone isn't watching Avengers Assemble!

Avengers-Secret-Wars-TV-Artwork.jpg

That art is atrocious.

The irony is Marvel does and has had more shows airing than DC for about 5 years now

At most DC has had 2 shows at a time
GLTAS/Young Justice
Teen Titans Go/Beware the Batman
Teen Titans Go/JLA

Whereas Marvel has had 3-4
Avengers EMH/Ultimate Spider-man
Avengers Assemble/Ultimate Spidey/Hulk Agents of Smash
Avengers Assemble/Ult Spidey/GoTG
Avengers Assemble/Spider-man/GoTG

Doesn't the Marvel stuff mostly suck tho?
 
Marvel is misogynistic too. Ironman was a complete nobody but is now the biggest super hero movie brand. Thor is similar. You get the point. Marvel never believed in women but gave nobody brands a huge fucking chance.

Well, marvel couldn't use x-men, spidey, F4 so they were forced to go the avengers route
 
I said I think it's because of the cartoons. BTAS, STAS, JL, JLU, etc.
X-Men TAS
Spider-man TAS
X-Men Evolution
Avengers EMH



That art is atrocious.



Doesn't the Marvel stuff mostly suck tho?
Ha my point is... I think just making a product doesn't help elevate a character. It has to be something that fans can latch onto.

And Marvel for the longest time has gone with least-common denominator for their animation output. Aimed squarely at kids who don't care with no real desire to "Graduate" their fans
 
A ton of Marvel's superheroine roster is rooted in team books, which makes it harder for them to break out as individual superstars. DC's, on the other hand, tend to be independent spinoffs of existing franchises (Supergirl, Batgirl, Harley), or straight up solo acts like Wondy.

Ultimately I guess it mostly comes down to one company having Wonder Woman and the other one not; she's most of the mindshare difference, honestly.
 
Marvel is actively holding back their biggest females because they can't use them in the MCU. If DC Didn't have access to movie rights for Harley and WW, they'd probably be squashed as well.
 
Batgirl and Supergirl are basically banking off their more popular make counter parts.

Rather have different female heroes all together tbh.

I'd hate if we had Ironwoman or Captain Amerigirl.

But I do think Marvel should back females that aren't Danvers.
 
DC actually tried outside of comics, unlike Marvel who gave up after the X-Men cartoon show.

Even just look at the movies. We're four movies into the DCEU and have both a Wonder Woman film and a Suicide Squad movie largely associated with Harley Quinn. They also have upcoming films such as Batgirl, Wonder Woman 2, Gotham City Sirens, and Suicide Squad 2.

Meanwhile, the MCU has been going since 2008, has 16 films, and we're not expected to get a female lead movie until 2019.
 
X-Men TAS
Spider-man TAS
X-Men Evolution
Avengers EMH


Ha my point is... I think just making a product doesn't help elevate a character. It has to be something that fans can latch onto.

And Marvel for the longest time has gone with least-common denominator for their animation output. Aimed squarely at kids who don't care with no real desire to "Graduate" their fans

It just sucks. They used to make awesome animated shows, and then they just disappeared. Loved all four of those shows. Even when Spiderman could get iffy.
 
The only female Marvel superheroes I as a causal comic book reader am aware of are;

Spider-Woman,
Silk,
Spider-Girl,
(Urgh) Spider-Gwen,
Ms Marvel,
Captain Marvel,
Black Widow,
Black Cat,
Invisible Girl,
Madam Web,
She-Hulk,
Scarlet Witch,
Storm,
Jean Grey,
(urgh) Jackpot,
Psylock,
Silver Sable,

Though I just tend to stick with Spider-Man so most of them came into my radar via other medium or when they appeared in Spider-Man but DC however I am aware of some of them due to my exposure to the DCAU.

There is another that has a ton of potential but might be lost in limbo between Sony and Marvel: Spider Gwen.

Nah Spider-Gwen is boring, Silk is the better character that Marvel should try and bring into the big big screen.
 
Squirrel Girl is getting a Freefrom TV show (with others), the She Hulk rights lie with Universal, Spider Gwen is with Sony and God knows when they will get to her and Kamala would require a complete and total change of the character and her origin story.

Um, why?
 
I think almost all popular female heroes in marvel are X-Men. But isn't X-Men now almost extinct in marvel? They are pushing inhumans super hard aren't they? To replace mutants. How is that working out for them?
 
DC is so much better at having their sidekick/legacy and "genderflipped" characters break away and have success as their own characters.

Ms Marvel is like the big exception for Marvel. Miles was another success which can be partly attributed to the fact Ultimate gave them the freedom to actually kill off Peter for good and put all the eggs in Miles. Where as a Riri Williams is a ticking time bomb ready to fade away when Tony comes back in full force.
 
Squirrel Girl is getting a Freefrom TV show (with others), the She Hulk rights lie with Universal, Spider Gwen is with Sony and God knows when they will get to her and Kamala would require a complete and total change of the character and her origin story.

Translation : Squirrel Girl was trown one step back, She Hulk cannot get her own movie so she will not appear in any other, SpiderGwen is with Sony and Kamala would require basic comic to movie adaptation
 
DC is so much better at having their sidekick/legacy and "genderflipped" characters break away and have success as their own characters.

Ms Marvel is like the big exception for Marvel. Miles was another success which can be partly attributed to the fact Ultimate gave them the freedom to actually kill off Peter for good and put all the eggs in Miles. Where as a Riri Williams is a ticking time bomb ready to fade away when Tony comes back in full force.
They're also not doing a good job following up on Ms. Marvel.

Where's her solo or Champions cartoon? What about a Champions game? Is there a huge merchandizing push? Why isn't she in the MCU?
 
X-Men TAS
Spider-man TAS
X-Men Evolution
Avengers EMH

Haven't seen EMH but when I think about women from those other shows I think Mary Jane, Black Cat, Rogue and Storm. When I think of DCAU I think Harley, Batgirl, Poison Ivy, Lois Lane, Amanda Waller, Catwoman, WW, Hawkgirl, Raven, Supergirl, Black Canary, Huntress, etc. I remember great storylines and episodes with those characters that none of the marvel toons could touch. They also just do more with their female characters in general and not just cartoons.
 
As far as mainstream Super heroines on the DC side its Wonder Woman and Female anti heroes its Catwoman and Harely Quin(maybe Poison Ivy). It not many but yeah its a lot more than Marvel.
 
It is kinda hilarious how pre-MCU the proprieties Marvel most made cartoons were the ones that they own for the MCU (or fully own in spidey's case)
 
I don't remmeber Marvel having anything animated in the last 40 years that had a female superhero as a main character. They might have, but it wasn't noteworthy.

Meanwhile DC has had Super Friends and the DCAU. Barbara Gordon got a big boost in popularity thanks to Batman: The Animated Series.
Huh? The various X-Men and Avengers cartoons all featured females quite prominently, and in some case make them a POV character even. Heck even going as far back as Spidey and his Amazing Friends you have Firebird as a main character.
 
Top Bottom