You're making some false equivalencies. One, that the legacy games count as "multiplat." Two, that Vita downports register as "multiplat." I'm aware it has some legitimate multiplats, but your best experience will typically be on PS3.Considering the state of multiplat, if you own one console the other consoles "have no games". Not really sure that is a valid argument.
People should stop saying "has no games" and start saying "has no games I want to buy."
No games I want and I never have the need to play anything on the go. I play enough when I'm at home and when I'm at home I don't have a need to play on a tiny handheld.
P
Except, if it isn't your only system, there's a decent chance you've already played the majority of its games elsewhere. That is what people mean when they say no games.
PS1, PSP, PS3 down-ports, PSN games, PS2 HD remasters, and Indie games make up the majority of Vita's library.
How many exclusive Vita games are available that would make someone specifically want to own a Vita? Combine that with a high price and horrible memory cards, ponder, then understand why most people haven't bought a Vita yet.
As a disclaimer, I do own one.
well i'd say expensive while not having the "need" to have it too
How much Vita should cost for you guys buy one?
It's quite interesting that UK folk are still complaining about the price, when there's been a stealth price drop: Vita + 8Gb memory card + 10 downloadable games to fill said memory card has an RRP of £169.99.
How much Vita should cost for you guys buy one?
I want to get a Vita to play PSP games, not to play Vita games. It's too expensive for that right now, so I'm waiting at least until I have more money to waste.
Gotta be honest, you're dead on here. Especially the last part. I like the system but the people who can't see the problems you described have their heads in the sand. A lot of the pro-vita gaf seems almost delusional. One guy yesterday said it was the greatest handheld of all time. Wtf?!I own, and love, the Vita. But if someone can't understand why it's floundering at market, they're unaware of the kinds of considerations a person tends to takes when selecting a product.
- Does it have a flourishing library of games relative to other products?
- Is it priced competitively relative to other products?
- Is it seeing distinct support from the company backing it?
- Does it offer experiences unavailable elsewhere?
- Does it require secondary purchases to use in the first place?
- Does the software being made for it tend to take advantage of the platform's strengths?
- Is the product visible to those outside of an insular contingent of early adopters?
- Do you have to make threads on internet message boards to justify ownership of it?
The answers to these should help most understand why the Vita isn't in an ideal situation. Put ALL these together, and if you still can't understand, then you're on your own. I still have hope, but aside from buying games for it which appeal to me, the platform's "health" is in Sony's hands. Posts like the OP here come off as desperate, pathetic, and make me less enthusiastic about being associated with the product itself.