but why would you play ME3?
ME3 > ME1 > ME2
Even though 1 is still my fav. Love that game to pieces.
ME3 > ME1 > ME2
Even though 1 is still my fav. Love that game to pieces.
That's what indoctrination does to youThis is the most confusing post I've ever seen on GAF.
I dunno even about that tbh.The best I can say about ME1's gameplay is: at least it wasn't Alpha Protocol.
Combat:
ME3 > ME2 > ME1
Characters and dialogue:
ME2 > ME1 > ME3
Story:
ME1 > ME2 > ME3
Of course, the reason The Witcher 1 isn't as universally loved is simply because it was a Polish fantasy RPG exclusive to the PC, whilst Mass Effect was a AAA Microsoft published Western Space Opera RPG for the most popular gaming system at the time, as well as the PC. Most people probably haven't actually played The Witcher 1.
I wonder about this, too. It wasn't until Mass Effect 2 came out that I started caring about the franchise.
Vocal minority. Some people wanted a particular type of game, which ME1 tried to be (and kind of failed in a not-so-graceful way), ME2 cut the fat and gave a leaner, more polished experience when some people were hoping the fat was going to be turned into delicious crackling.
Mein rankings:
Combat:
ME3 > ME2 > ME1
Characters and dialogue:
ME2 > ME1 > ME3
Story:
ME1 > ME2 > ME3
Characters and dialogue:
ME2 > ME1 > ME3
TW1 isn't loved because the combat was total ass. It had the worst RPG combat since Planescape Torment imo. Like the combat was seriously so not fun that I stopped playing eventually, just because of it.
Vocal minority. Some people wanted a particular type of game, which ME1 tried to be (and kind of failed in a not-so-graceful way), ME2 cut the fat and gave a leaner, more polished experience when some people were hoping the fat was going to be turned into delicious crackling.
Mein rankings:
Combat:
ME3 > ME2 > ME1
Characters and dialogue:
ME2 > ME1 > ME3
Story:
ME1 > ME2 > ME3
Guys if you don't mind - this thread is not about the sequels lol. I don't care about them and they are not good WRPGs by any stretch of the imagination. Being better than them is absolutely irrelevant to the matter at hand. Please explain to me how ME1 is considered among the best or better WRPGs when IMO significantly better WRPGs were released in that same very era. I named a few.
Agree with all of this. Traversing planets in the Mako was like a puzzle meta game where it was rewarding to run into some strange base being used for nefarious things.My main reasons were because I loved the weapon crafting stuff (even though inv management could be tedious) and am one of the people who thought the Mako rover was really fun to drive. That thing was a HALO warthog with jump jets and I loved it.
The world building (especially on the Citadel) was really special, I thought. I loved that one stretch where you first get cut loose on the Citadel and there are a great chunk of meaty sidequests on the Citadel itself.
Because while the sequels have better gameplay, there's an argument to be made that ME1 nailed everything else (story, characters, music, world building, etc)
Borderline broken? Are you being serious? This is just like people calling Pokemon gen 1 broken, and it doesn't make sense. The games are perfectly playable, and you can't hit any game-breaking bugs (that I know of) unless you pretty much do it on purpose. Unrefined isn't the same as broken.
Agree with all of this. Traversing planets in the Mako was like a puzzle meta game where it was rewarding to run into some strange base being used for nefarious things.
Vocal minority. Some people wanted a particular type of game, which ME1 tried to be (and kind of failed in a not-so-graceful way), ME2 cut the fat and gave a leaner, more polished experience when some people were hoping the fat was going to be turned into delicious crackling.
Mein rankings:
Combat:
ME3 > ME2 > ME1
Characters and dialogue:
ME2 > ME1 > ME3
Story:
ME1 > ME2 > ME3
Yup, the first one also had a great soundtrack that harkened back to 80's sci fi with it's use of synth.#1
the atmosphere was better. grittier. exotic.
the universe felt vast and empty.
it was darker in tone
it played more like an rpg.
the plot was clearer, more concise.
it was less hollywood action. more suspense and intrigue.
#2
was a series of fetch quests down corridors
the rpg elements were gone
gear was set
shitty fucking minigames like mineral mining
ammo clips
#3
the story at this point was so convoluted.
the game is now a shooter.
and the ending fucking SUCKED...
Because while the sequels have better gameplay, there's an argument to be made that ME1 nailed everything else (story, characters, music, world building, etc)