Danne-Danger
Member
It's great! Nothing stands up to Machete though.dark10x said:The Ghost Writer, huh? I can't believe I forgot about that. Will have to check that out immediately!
It's great! Nothing stands up to Machete though.dark10x said:The Ghost Writer, huh? I can't believe I forgot about that. Will have to check that out immediately!
Borgnine said:You can't call Black Swan predictable because it's not trying to fool you. Everyone keeps saying how they guessed what was happening right from the beginning. I didn't know it was supposed to be a secret. We all know what's happening, so let's watch it unfold.
Battersea Power Station said:It's a modern take on one of the most famous ballets with a widely-known story...
It's like saying a Hansel & Gretel movie would be predictable: yeah, we all know what happens.
Why do you think The Black Swan was made to surprise you with its ending? It wasn't. It's just an exploration of psychosis, obsession, etc.
Well the problem for me is that I knew there was some sort of a twist (thanks to reviews)and that did anchor my whole take on the movie. Plus, the twist became evident quite quickly. Movies don't exist in a vacuum these days with the Internet.Mike Works said:Shutter Island is fucking awesome, one of the best movies of the year, and I pity anyone who can't enjoy it because they've become so conditioned to hate Shyamalan's movies that they can't appreciate the whole of a great Scorsese psychological thriller.
Thats how I felt about SI. It wasnt a bad movie, its just something I've seen about a billion times that in no way seems to innovate (be it the way in which it's told, characters, visual texture) or at least put a twist (no pun intended) on the same tale.RSTEIN said:Well the problem for me is that I knew there was some sort of a twist (thanks to reviews)and that did anchor my whole take on the movie. Plus, the twist became evident quite quickly. Movies don't exist in a vacuum these days with the Internet.
However, even if I didn't know about the twist, or even if there was no twist, it wouldn't change my opinion because the whole movie is just so boring. There's no energy behind the lens (if that makes sense?). To quote Bud Fox from Wall Street, it was like having sex with the Wall Street Journal.
Black Swan is the opposite. It just oozes with energy. It takes your breath away.
I think that is perhaps the only thing that can be agreed upon.Snowman Prophet of Doom said:I will say that Black Swan has by far the best acting of the three films.
RSTEIN said:Well the problem for me is that I knew there was some sort of a twist (thanks to reviews)and that did anchor my whole take on the movie. Plus, the twist became evident quite quickly. Movies don't exist in a vacuum these days with the Internet.
The Social Network > Black Swan >>> Shutter Island >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> InceptionCount Dookkake said:Black Swan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shutter Island >>>>>> Inception
Foreign Jackass said:And don't get me on that "It's cool to hate on Inception" thing. It was always smart and in good taste to hate Inception, since it's a shitty, boring movie. The haters (myself included) just got completely drowned in the people repeatedly giving out love to it, saying it was the best movie of all time, 10 posts each a day.
ahoyhoy said:I always love GAF's Oscar-season revolt against highly rated Summer films. Happens every year around this time, and always produces the lolz.
Borgnine said:You can't call Black Swan predictable because it's not trying to fool you. Everyone keeps saying how they guessed what was happening right from the beginning. I didn't know it was supposed to be a secret. We all know what's happening, so let's watch it unfold.
Shutter Island is a mystery, you're trying to figure out what the hell is going on. It's just a bunch of shit that happens for 2 hours and then they suddenly peel back the curtain to explain what you've been seeing, and you're just like... ok.
I can't speak of Black Swan, as I haven't seen it yet, but reading your post completely brings me back to feeling pity for people who went in seeing Shutter Island solely anticipating a twist.RSTEIN said:Well the problem for me is that I knew there was some sort of a twist (thanks to reviews)and that did anchor my whole take on the movie. Plus, the twist became evident quite quickly. Movies don't exist in a vacuum these days with the Internet.
However, even if I didn't know about the twist, or even if there was no twist, it wouldn't change my opinion because the whole movie is just so boring. There's no energy behind the lens (if that makes sense?). To quote Bud Fox from Wall Street, it was like having sex with the Wall Street Journal.
Black Swan is the opposite. It just oozes with energy. It takes your breath away.
You called thatHavok said:I enjoyed Shutter Island, but they telegraphed the twist so blatantly every single step of the way that it lacked any impact for me at the end. I called it after I saw the trailer, and while predictability isn't horrible, it took enough away from the payoff at the end that it soured the experience just a bit.
Mike Works said:Shutter Island is fucking awesome, one of the best movies of the year, and I pity anyone who can't enjoy it because they've become so conditioned to hate Shyamalan's movies that they can't appreciate the whole of a great Scorsese psychological thriller.
I just re-watched it for the first time this weekend, still great.
Mike Works said:You called thatfrom the trailer?DiCaprio was a patient and Kingsley had set up an elaborate role-playing experiment in an effort to allow him to come to terms with reality
really agree with this post. i went into shutter island knowing the twist and it didn't spoil the film for me at all. people went in with the wrong expectations.Mike Works said:I can't speak of Black Swan, as I haven't seen it yet, but reading your post completely brings me back to feeling pity for people who went in seeing Shutter Island solely anticipating a twist.
The mood in Shutter Island is so fucking enjoyable- from the island's first introduction, to the random patients, to the WW2 flashbacks/dreams... god it's great. I honestly can't fathom someone complaining that there's no "energy" (behind the lens) in the movie. The concentration camp scenes, the dream sequence with his wife, the interactions with the head of the island... it's just not a complain I can comprehend.
And for the record, I thought DiCaprio was much better in Shutter Island than he was in Inception, though that's partially due to him having a better character/material to work with in Shutter Island.
Another great movie, forgotten. Plot was pretty obvious, but Polaski shot the hell out of that film.dark10x said:The Ghost Writer, huh? I can't believe I forgot about that. Will have to check that out immediately!
What I thought was brilliant is that you think you get it pretty quick - LeoBlader5489 said:Give me a break. I like Shutter Island, but it is no way a great, or even good, psychological thriller. It requires zero thought, spoon feeds everything to the audience in scenes of *pure* exposition (a lot of which isn't even necessary to begin with), and--unlike Black Swan or Inception--offers nothing visually during this exposition. There's nothing psychological about it.
The latter is a stretch, but the former? Come on. The trailer makes it pretty clear thatLeo is Patient 67.
Xrenity said:What I thought was brilliant is that you think you get it pretty quick - Leo- but in the end there's so much more to it.must be 67, he is/is gonna be a patient
Yeah, because Inception had an unpredictable and original ending amirite? FWIW i like dShutter Island's ending a lot more than Inception's (which was a disappointment).Borgnine said:Because if your movie is going to end with a predictable twist you need to make the journey to the twist worth watching. Shutter Island failed to do this.
inception has so many plot holes that it shouldn't even get the kind of recognition it gets.Vieo said:Inception is the superior movie based on plot originality alone.
It may "require zero thought" after the movie, but you're just straight up wrong otherwise. Think back to the dream sequence where Leo talks to his dead wife in his apartment. Or to the one where he dreams of Patient 67 and her dead children. Do those scenes spoon-feed anything to the audience? Would you consider them pure exposition? Would you argue that the image of his wife crumbling to ash in his arms or a small avalanche of corpses frozen within ice aren't visually enticing?Blader5489 said:Give me a break. I like Shutter Island, but it is no way a great, or even good, psychological thriller. It requires zero thought, spoon feeds everything to the audience in scenes of *pure* exposition (a lot of which isn't even necessary to begin with), and--unlike Black Swan or Inception--offers nothing visually during this exposition. There's nothing psychological about it.
The latter IS the answer. The former could be guessed by fucking anyone just from reading the most basic synopsis of the movie, let alone watching the trailer, let alone watching the movie. People claiming that they "guessed the ending" to this movie are such a joke to me. Shutter Island's "twist" is NOTThe latter is a stretch, but the former? Come on. The trailer makes it pretty clear thatLeo is Patient 67.
Well the main difference between Shutter Island and Inception was that Inception was fun to watchviakado said:inception has so many plot holes that it shouldn't even get the kind of recognition it gets.
preferred cup of tea i suppose.Korey said:Well the main difference between Shutter Island and Inception was that Inception was fun to watch
shuyin_ said:Yeah, because Inception had an unpredictable and original ending amirite? FWIW i like dShutter Island's ending a lot more than Inception's (which was a disappointment).
Edit: that said, Inception is better executed and more fun/thrilling to watch. But when it comes to endings, Shutter Island > Bubonic Plague > World War 2 > Inception
I'm inclined to believe many people's opinions on the film changed as time passedUltimoo said:Was Inception really disliked so much on GAF? Then again, the only thread that has any Inception discussion is the OT but that's mostly filled with plot comments and high praise, where do the inception haters hide for half the year then?
Count Dookkake said:I preferred Inception when it was called The Cell, which I preferred when it was called Dreamscape.
Ultimoo said:Was Inception really disliked so much on GAF? Then again, the only thread that has any Inception discussion is the OT but that's mostly filled with plot comments and high praise, where do the Inception haters hide for half the year then?
I don't think many people hate Inception. Most consider it a good movie; just not the amazing experience it was supposed to be. Coming from the director of Memento and The Prestige, it certainly failed to meet expectations.Ultimoo said:Was Inception really disliked so much on GAF? Then again, the only thread that has any Inception discussion is the OT but that's mostly filled with plot comments and high praise, where do the Inception haters hide for half the year then?
movie of the forever?Ultimoo said:Was Inception really disliked so much on GAF? Then again, the only thread that has any Inception discussion is the OT but that's mostly filled with plot comments and high praise, where do the Inception haters hide for half the year then?
Prototype-03 said:It was too easy to figure it out. I figured it out 1/4 way in what was happening. It definitely has a better storyline than Inception, but Inception executed a lot better. I haven't watched Black Swan, so I have no idea with that one.