http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/movies/a8986489/moonlight-was-robbed-of-its-moment/
The Academy Awards did the best possible thing in the worst possible way last night, when it conferred Moonlight the Oscar for Best Picture.
...
But in the middle of the La La Land team giving their round of acceptance speeches, they were told that the award had actually gone to Moonlight, and that team was then invited on stage as an afterthought. In the shuffle, host Jimmy Kimmel tried to assuage the clear disappointment of the La La Land'ers saying, ”I think you guys should keep it anyway." That's not how this works, Jimmy Kimmel. That's not how any of this works!
It is both entirely obvious and absolutely necessary to say that this incident is an apt metaphor for thinking about the politics of race and diversity in America. It has taken multiple decades of struggle to even arrive at a universe where a movie with the emotional and artistic complexity of Moonlight, a movie that puts black characters and communities at its center, would have a shot at multiple Oscars. Then it won the evening's biggest prize of all, but only after being told it lost. And then the film's creators had to share the stage with La La Land. The moment was unfortunate for everyone involved, but it was most unfortunate for Moonlight.
...
This debacle brought into stark relief just exactly how messy it is and will continue to be to make traditionally white institutions more diverse and inclusive. In many cases, it will look like black people coming on stage to take away the very awards that white people presumed they would win and prepared themselves to receive. This is the scary part of what it means for white people to challenge white privilege: it means sometimes they will lose. More than that, it means they will have to endure the humiliation of losing when they were so entirely sure they had won.
Part of what it requires to do the work of diversity is to recognize that there are some moments you simply cannot mess up. This was one of those moments. Although PricewaterhouseCoopers, the accounting firm that oversees the tabulation of Oscars ballots, has taken responsibility for the mix-up, imagine how it feels to the talent of Moonlight to not have had the fullness of their moment. Imagine how the mistake feels to those of us who have rarely seen ourselves represented in the awards ceremony. The carelessness and haphazardness with which Moonlight's moment was treated is indicative of how institutional racism continues to work, even after people of color have overcome a significant barrier.
Institutional racism is often hard to see because we can't point to an individual person who had bad intentions. Thus we are often taught to think that structural discrimination isn't real. But institutional racism isn't about a single actor or intent; it's about impact. Sunday night's comedy of errors is only laughable because it's an awards show. In the lives of everyday black people, this kind of carelessness shows up when a supervisor fails to celebrate the promotion of a black employee, while the promotion of a white counterpart is the subject of copious congratulation — it may have been an honest oversight, but the impact is harmful.
...
Although Horowitz handled the mix-up with grace, and Moonlight director Barry Jenkins acknowledged as much, it is the graciousness with which Jenkins and the entire Moonlight team handled the botching of their well-deserved moment that is worthy of our applause. Much like Jimmy Kimmel, however, Americans are socially conditioned to feel the most empathy for what white folks are losing rather than for what black folks are rightfully, finally winning. Certainly Kimmel was not being malicious when he said to the La La Land producers, ”I think you should just keep it anyway." He felt bad that anyone should have to lose in such a public way. But notice that what Kimmel didn't say is, ”Let's get Moonlight up here right now and let them have their moment." His empathy, like that of many others, went towards the people who looked most like him on stage.
Read more
i think the article makes a lot of good points, and i think people are wrong to think that any of what happened was malicious, intentional, or conspiratorial. the article is saying that you can look at the handling of the event, and how everyone reacted and have a glimpse of institutional racism happening in real time.
This is what I mean by not engaging what the fuck we be saying.
The title of the article is 'Why It's Important to Recognize That "Moonlight" Was Robbed Of Its Moment'. Read that back a few times.
NOBODY is saying that the shit was planned. Please stop bringing it up as if that's our problem. The point of the article is to:
1. Recognize that while the gaffe could have happened to anyone, it's especially bad because of the circumstances
2. Recognize that in many eyes this win can't be separated from LLL when it deserves to stand on its own
3. Recognize the micro aggressions acted out by Kimmel
These points were NOT hard to grasp from the article. But nobody took the time to engage it with any sort of nuance or any sort of empathy for black people. You all just said that it wasn't a big deal, it was a honest mistake, and that we should get over ourselves for "reaching".
Nobody is telling you to agree with anybody. What's insulting is the instant dismissal of our concerns. And if you're upset that I put yt ppl in it, then build a bridge and get over it, because most of you all just played into it at the beginning of this thread like I said.