.OH boo hoo. Try being German and having every second game be about your ancestors that everyone wants to play as in mp. Also they got awesome panzers and airplanes.
.OH boo hoo. Try being German and having every second game be about your ancestors that everyone wants to play as in mp. Also they got awesome panzers and airplanes.
OH boo hoo. Try being German and having every second game be about your evil ancestors.
I agree and here's why - because communism as defined by Marx and Engels has never worked in real life, and the Soviet Union was proof since it was just another dictatorship. The way I see it Nazi germany and the USSR were both totalitarian systems in which all power came from the state or one higher authority(Hitler & Stalin), not from individuals. Both systems did not allow for parliamentary democracy and freedom of speech. Both relied heavily on suppression of dissent, and did not allow for a free discourse since both systems claimed to be the only truth.
Y'know, atleast germans seem to have found a proper way of dealing with Nazi war crimes and atrocities
Russians approved a declaration blaming Stalin and other Soviet officials for the massacre.
OH boo hoo. Try being German and having every second game be about your evil ancestors.
I would say no German really cares about that, because they know that the majority of Nazis, even if they just followed orders, were following a bad ideology.
Company of Heroes is not a historical representation of the World War II. It's not a history sim. It takes the most exaggerated/stereotypical traits of each army and make them a gameplay mechanism trying to reach a balance of making it fun and entertaining.
Sure; except the developers specifically claimed it was historically accurate.
I found it interesting. Makes some good points.
Could you please elaborate on that a bit more, I'd love to hear how the USSR was a shining example of communism. How about North Korea too?Except that it worked in the USSR from 1920 - 1956. Except it worked in Vietnam. Except it worked in Cuba. Except it worked in China.
Another example of socialist utopia. I guess all these Cubans going through the waters of the Florida Straits on homemade rafts and boats must be nuts then. Why would they risk their lives to get out of cuba and into the US? Poor misguided fools, someone should explain to them how awful capitalism is.Cuba has an incredibly impressive social system. Envious, almost. Majority of people are politically aware, they do not tolerate racism, Cuba manages its entire economy without exploitation, free high quality education, free high quality healthcare, excellent community and social togetherness.
Well, you'd be right if it weren't for one tiny little detail - rejection of political pluralism in communism. In the USSR there was only one legal, ruling political party. Cuba and China? Same thing, single-party countries. No diversity, no choice, no freedom.We live in Total systems everywhere in which power is vested in the authority of the State.
Parliamentarism is no more or less democratic than the Soviet system. In both systems we vote for local government, and the parties on a national level push the candidates that they've approved of internally and then we get to "vote" on someone who may represent us at some point in time.
Nobody said that. But I do agree with you, because Stalin and Hitler were not alone, they had a large following of people as passionate and genuine about their beliefs as these self-proclaimed Leaders/Dictators of the People. While Germans have, rightly, castigated themselves as a nation for their collective sins during the Nazi era, are Russians collectively any less responsible for Stalins war crimes? That's what really boggles my mind, because so many people suffered under the terror and repressions of the Stalin period, so many were wrongly convicted, many killed(both Russians and citizens of their former satellite states) and yet surveys conducted in the past years show up to almost 50% of Russians agreeing that Stalin had a positive role in the life of their country. Russians already know that Stalin was a tyrant and a murderer but the way I see it their attitude toward him is dictated more by anti-Western rhetoric in Russian society then historical facts - like the idea that the West is trying to deprive them of their glory and minimize their role in the victory over Germany, and arguably I can actually understand that.The idea that Hitler and Stalin personally shot people is as silly as the idea that Truman personally dropped the bombs on Japan.
Oh, and I thought the civil unrest in Germany in the 60's was because East Germany sealed itself off behind walls, chained fences, barbed wires and minefields to prevent the massive emigration and defection of people from the authoritarian communist Eastern Bloc.No they haven't. The civil unrest in Germany in the 60s and 70s was because America literally put the Nazi's back into power. The German state has supported Neo Nazis the world over.
Maybe you should read up on that a bit more. An investigation by a Slovenian team of journalists from 2012 revealed that many countries - including Russia, which had voted for the arms embargo imposed by the United Nations Security Council, were actively involved in violating it. Shamefully also Polish ex-military intelligence service officers were participating in arms smuggling to the affected conflict zones. German bankers were providing financing through proxy companies, russian oligarchs and ex-KGB officials were selling vast quantities of weapons(including hundreds of anti-aircraft and anti-armour missiles), Brittish company Racal delivered military communications equipment shortly before Slovenia broke off from Yugoslavia, but somehow I cannot find informations regarding the US arming Fascist paramilitaries, nope. In the end lets not forget that these were illegal operations conducted by arms smugglers and shady businessman, not by Governments.The Balkan genocide in the 90s was a direct result of Germany, Britain, and the US arming Fascist paramilitaries and sending them to fight Socialist Slavs and Muslims. Yugoslavia was a largely peaceful Communist country without a scandalous history, but because of their political alignment the West endorsed genocide against them.
Oh yes, he made life better for an 'overwhelming' majority just as Hitler did. All it took was to get rid of all the unwanted ones like jewish people, gypsies, homosexuals, criples, etc. and pretty much everybody else who didn't fit into his worldview. It was Stalin afterall who said "Death is the solution to all problems. No man - no problem".Russians more and more approve of Stalin's programs because the historical fact that he made life better for an overwhelming majority without the massive issues of crime, poverty, drug abuse, joblessness, and corruption that modern Russia faces.
I'm from Eastern Europe and have never ever heard something as ridiculous as what you just wrote.There are two funny sayings from my Eastern European friends.
The Communist Horde was terrible. They invaded and left hospitals, schools, and industry in their wake.
Could you please elaborate on that a bit more, I'd love to hear how the USSR was a shining example of communism.
Another example of socialist utopia. I guess all these Cubans going through the waters of the Florida Straits on homemade rafts and boats must be nuts then. Why would they risk their lives to get out of cuba and into the US? Poor misguided fools, someone should explain to them how awful capitalism is.
Well, you'd be right if it weren't for one tiny little detail - rejection of political pluralism in communism. In the USSR there was only one legal, ruling political party. Cuba and China? Same thing, single-party countries. No diversity, no choice, no freedom.
Russians collectively any less responsible for Stalins war crimes?
Russians already know that Stalin was a tyrant and a murderer but the way I see it their attitude toward him is dictated more by anti-Western rhetoric in Russian society then historical facts - like the idea that the West is trying to deprive them of their glory and minimize their role in the victory over Germany, and arguably I can actually understand that.
Oh, and I thought the civil unrest in Germany in the 60's was because East Germany sealed itself off behind walls, chained fences, barbed wires and minefields to prevent the massive emigration and defection of people from the authoritarian communist Eastern Bloc.
informations regarding the US arming Fascist paramilitaries
All it took was to get rid of all the unwanted ones like jewish people, gypsies, homosexuals, criples, etc.
It was Stalin afterall who said "Death is the solution to all problems. No man - no problem".
There were schools, hospitals and industry long before the Wehrmacht and Red Army marched into Poland.
you don't know much about german history if you believe this. but if it's any consolation for you turning a blind eye on the nazi backrounds of some high politicians, judges etc. was only one of the reasons for the unrest and later terroristic acts in germany. so Zuhzuhzombie!! isn't 100% correct on this one. the building of the wall on the other hand, wasn't one of the reasons.Oh, and I thought the civil unrest in Germany in the 60's was because East Germany sealed itself off behind walls, chained fences, barbed wires and minefields to prevent the massive emigration and defection of people from the authoritarian communist Eastern Bloc.
i'm not sure if i understood you correctly, so please clarify.The German state has supported Neo Nazis the world over.
Access to hospitals, education, housing, land and, outside of famine and war, quality of life in Eastern Europe rose exponentially until the 70s when, like the rest of the world, they started facing economic problems.
We don't have much pluralism in the USA either. Any candidate not vetted by big business has no chance of entering national politics.
It's almost like they're not letting foreign politics influence what they personally experienced in their own country. I wonder why that could be.
???
The USSR didn't have a policy of active discrimination against any of those groups. Homosexuality was taboo, but it was so everywhere in the 40s.
Stalin never said that.
Russians more and more approve of Stalin's programs because the historical fact that he made life better for an overwhelming majority without the massive issues of crime, poverty, drug abuse, joblessness, and corruption that modern Russia faces.
i'm not sure if i understood you correctly, so please clarify.
From Ukraine... And most of the things that I'm saying are not even from the first sources. They are from OFFICIAL documents released by Soviet Union. For example 144,000 soldires were OFFICIALLY court marshalled and executed. (That's an insane number as is) There are a lot more documents that show how much Soviet leadership cared about its own population.
Anyway this is the last thing that I will write. I don't think that I can change your mind, but what is making me angry is the fact that you are defending cruel government that has nothing to do with your country. Your people never experienced the evils of that regime. Even in 1980s you could be prosecuted for telling a joke about communist party. My parents were PROHIBITED by the school to go to church.
P.S. just for you general knowledge. Just because you label something as communism does not make it into communism. China is "communist" nation with capilalism pretty much responsible for economic expansion. Technically communist government should be almost non existent but in Soviet Union there was the same cruel leader for decades. You can't bild your argument on labels...
Communists in many countries are extremely misinformed, their party gives them the most biased books to read about Stalin etc...I wouldn't bother with him and rest assured that I agree with you 100% at least![]()
Yeah its one of those things that are well impossible for us rich westerners to imagine. Even in Estonia many people living standards are close to african and that was one of the most advanced soviet republics. Last week I spent 5 nights in an old house with electricity only in the 1st floor, wooden stove, no running water, no indoor toilet, no possibility to wash/take a shower. As a 1st world inhabitant it was quite a shock to me while not so uncommon in Estonia.
Imagine how its like in Russia, people are still living in the autharchic 15th century on the countryside.
My wifes Ingrian grandmother spend time in both german and soviet prison camps during the WW2 as well as exile in Siberia so I knowthe stories. Life wasen't worth a shit, especially if you weren't a Russian but of some "suspicious" nationality like Finns, Poles, Germans, Estonians, or Ingrians.
Exactly
Also winter in some of those countries is like a post apocalyptic wasteland![]()
Everything highly centralized and government-run.Access to hospitals, education, housing, land and, outside of famine and war, quality of life in Eastern Europe rose exponentially until the 70s when, like the rest of the world, they started facing economic problems.
No, it means that Communism is a flawed political and economic system because people will not work as hard for the benefit of strangers as they will for themselves or their families.What's the point in bringing up North Korea? Does Somalia's existence mean the rest of the non socialist world is also terrible?
Partially, what you are referring to is economic migration, as in people looking for a new start in a wealthier, more developed country with better opportunities. I was referring to people who often risk their lives on dangerously crude and overcrowded boats to escape not only poverty, but also opression from the Communist apparatus.You mean like how Haitians, Mexicans, Colombians, Peruvians, etc also illegally immigrate from capitalist countries into the USA?
You certainly have more pluralism than most communist countries which are de facto one-party states.We don't have much pluralism in the USA either. Any candidate not vetted by big business has no chance of entering national politics.
It doesn't matter what political ideology they were following. Sending people to labor camps where they died of starvation and overwork, imprisoning them and then executing is just as despicable as what the Nazis did. But fyi, the NKVD in their repressions did concentrate on national minorities and Soviet citizens of foreign origin.Why should they? The USSR's political ideology didn't exist around racial superiority and the extermination of "lesser" people.
I didn't say anything about West Germany, neither did you in your previous postWhy would there be civil unrest in West Germany over East Germany building the wall?
I wasn't refering to just the USSR. My point is that there were similarities in Hitlers and Stalins methods, and how they treated ethnic minorities as well as political opponents.The USSR didn't have a policy of active discrimination against any of those groups.
Article 121 of the Soviet Union criminal code made male homosexuality a crime punishable by up to five years in prison with hard labor.Homosexuality was taboo, but it was so everywhere in the 40s.
You are correct and that was my mistake quoting Rybakov, I apologize.Stalin never said that.
I was talking about the Soviet invasion from 1939, not 1920. But since you're mentioning this, we did pretty well in 1920 considering we just regained independence back in 1918, facing economic dificulties due to massive destruction left after WWI, the exploitation of the Polish economy by the German and Russian occupation, and the sabotage performed by retreating armies. We did pretty well till 1939.Poland was a feudal, agrarian state before the 1920s. It had no industry and little of everything else.
I'm quite aware of the student movement and how it empowered the anger of the spoiled psychopaths from the RAF about post-war denazification in West and East Germany. Although I wouldn't go as far as he did and call it a civil unrest(neither did it culminate in one).you don't know much about german history if you believe this. but if it's any consolation for you turning a blind eye on the nazi backrounds of some high politicians, judges etc. was only one of the reasons for the unrest and later terroristic acts in germany. so Zuhzuhzombie!! isn't 100% correct on this one. the building of the wall on the other hand, wasn't one of the reasons.
What? I mean, seriously. What? While there are theories and speculation that part of the reason for the two bomb drops in Japan were to demonstrate that the US had the bomb it was not the sole reason, nor was the war over by any means at that point. The Japanese had been driven to their home soil and were prepared to defend it long enough to force a cease-fire under more beneficial terms to themselves at the cost of many more lives, both Japanese and American. Reports differ on exact figures but they still had a large army, familiarity with the battlefield, and the willingness to press civilians into armed militias.
All of these factors were contributors to the decision to drop the bombs. Whether or not the death toll in an invasion would have been higher is one of the greatest military debates of the last century and will likely never have a definitive answer.
Come on, don't try to defend the a-boms ore the fire bombs on civilian cities. what the Americans did was genocidal and so did the Japanese.
Everything highly centralized and government-run.
Nationalised hospitals and medical practices - neat idea if it were not for the Bolsheviks who after the October revolution decided to brand all doctors as rotten bourgeois and enemies of the people forcing many to leave the country. Salaries in the health industry were throughout the years among the lowest in the country, and by the late 50's medical care stopped actually being free because underpaid personal became less covert in accepting bribes from patients in exchange for medical services, supplies and drugs. The overall state of the health industry was way behind the West.
I'd also hardly consider collective flat blocks which were built quickly, with an emphasis on quantity over quality, and in underdeveloped neighborhoods, with poor systems of public transportation, an achievement.
Their agriculture was unproductive due to the climate, lack of proper transport infrastructure and poor worker productivity and inneficient operation of collective farms.
I could go on and on. There were certainly some achievements but nothing was certainly free and as great as you make it out to be.
No, it means that Communism is a flawed political and economic system because people will not work as hard for the benefit of strangers as they will for themselves or their families.
Partially, what you are referring to is economic migration, as in people looking for a new start in a wealthier, more developed country with better opportunities. I was referring to people who often risk their lives on dangerously crude and overcrowded boats to escape not only poverty, but also opression from the Communist apparatus.
You certainly have more pluralism than most communist countries which are de facto one-party states.
It doesn't matter what political ideology they were following. Sending people to labor camps where they died of starvation and overwork, imprisoning them and then executing is just as despicable as what the Nazis did. But fyi, the NKVD in their repressions did concentrate on national minorities and Soviet citizens of foreign origin.
I didn't say anything about West Germany, neither did you in your previous post
I wasn't refering to just the USSR. My point is that there were similarities in Hitlers and Stalins methods, and how they treated ethnic minorities as well as political opponents.
Article 121 of the Soviet Union criminal code made male homosexuality a crime punishable by up to five years in prison with hard labor.
ARTICLE 121. Citizens of the U.S.S.R. have the right to education. This right is ensured by universal, compulsory elementary education; by education, including higher education, being free of charge; by the system of state stipends for the overwhelming majority of students in the universities and colleges; by instruction in schools being conducted in the native Ianguage, and by the organization in the factories, state farms, machine and tractor stations and collective farms of free vocational, technical and agronomic training for the working people.
You are correct and that was my mistake quoting Rybakov, I apologize.
He did say though that a concentration camp is an excellent idea in regards to the eradication of counter-revolutionaries in Estonia.
I was talking about the Soviet invasion from 1939, not 1920. But since you're mentioning this, we did pretty well in 1920 considering we just regained independence back in 1918, facing economic dificulties due to massive destruction left after WWI, the exploitation of the Polish economy by the German and Russian occupation, and the sabotage performed by retreating armies. We did pretty well till 1939.
I'm quite aware of the student movement and how it empowered the anger of the spoiled psychopaths from the RAF about post-war denazification in West and East Germany. Although I wouldn't go as far as he did and call it a civil unrest(neither did it culminate in one).
At least Russians get mentioned n games about WWII. Hell Canadians were fighting in the war since it began and we never get mentioned. Shit we fought in many of the important battles and we are never even given a passing mention in any WWII media.
At least Russians get mentioned n games about WWII. Hell Canadians were fighting in the war since it began and we never get mentioned. Shit we fought in many of the important battles and we are never even given a passing mention in any WWII media.
Royal Canadian Artillery was that tree, to be precise.I believe the expansion for Company of Heroes 1 that added the British had one of its three sections as Canadians.
To make it simple the allies were gray, Soviets were black with a little gray and the nazis was pitch black. Some of the cruelest scum to walk the earth especially when it comes towards not Germans.
What the hell are you talking about? The USSR was a nightmare, Vietnam abandoned Communism for state-capitalism, Cuba is finally starting to do the same. And while I wouldn't say Cuba is as bad as most Americans think taking it up as some paradise is laughable at best. These countries were shit under "communism". Again the only long term example of actual Communism I can think of are the kibbitz in Israel.Except that it worked in the USSR from 1920 - 1956. Except it worked in Vietnam. Except it worked in Cuba. Except it worked in China.
Blah
blah
blah
Access to hospitals, education, housing, land and, outside of famine and war, quality of life in Eastern Europe rose exponentially until the 70s when, like the rest of the world, they started facing economic problems.
img said:
The facts: Soviet Union was an imperialist, racist, nationalist, murderous, barbaric, communist, cruel regime which did in fact militarilly invade, occupy, subjucade and murder people belonging in other nationalities and even its own.
They commited a shitload of attrocities and were one of the aggressors of WW2.
However the Nazis were extraordinarilly racist, extraordinarilly barbaric and had they won, the fate of eastern europeans and Russians would be unimaginably terrible indeed. Of course when it comes to places like Poland both the Soviets and the nazis fucked with them.
To make it simple the allies were gray, Soviets were black with a little gray and the nazis was pitch black. Some of the cruelest scum to walk the earth especially when it comes towards not Germans.
Soviet Union does not deserve white washing, its victims certainly deserve more than that. Nevertheless the people who died fighting against the Germans, especially people in the Soviet union payed a big blood price also need their role to be awknowledged.
You sir are full of bullshit, you are either on a right political party that use this kind of propaganda or an anticommunist, because my father hospitalised in USSR in 1984 because he broke his angle in a motorcycle accident. The injury was so bad that the doctors in my country wanted to severe his leg. But my grandfather who was an active communist sent my father to the USSR. In 1984 they used organic transplant to fix his shutter angle bone, he lived for free for 6 month because of the specific treatment and physiotherapy and because he felt obligated to the doctors and it is a Greek "habit" to pay large amount of "black" money to the doctors, the same doctors not only he did NOT accept the money but he pass my father a full lecture about the oath of Hippocratis and said that as a Greek it was his duty to know what being a doctor is. My father is a hardcore anticommunist but to this day he says that if it wasn't a soviet doctor to save his leg now he would be a leg "shorter".
On the other front on education and agriculture you are again full of bullshit, the Soviets were the first to send a rocket in orbit around the moon and the first man in space, Yuri Gagarin in 1961!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Gagarin
After being devastated the 80% of the industrial block of production in WW2. Even JFK said about that on the University speech about Peace. After the Cuban missile crisis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_University_speech
You dare now say about JFK he was a Stalin apologist...
Really have you ever see how the capitalistic system treats immigrants, and you talk about oppression, you sir sure are ignorant.
You are so full of lies that the article on 121 on Soviet Union is about is the right on FREE education.
http://www.departments.bucknell.edu/russian/const/36cons04.html
It is beyond my mind that you fall for in a simple mistake as to SPREAD SO MANY lies and you did not even bother look for if it is real... Or you said some random number to make your lies more formal to the uneducated. Now do your self a favour and stop posting. For the rest of you check the link to the constitution of the Soviet Union about homosexuality oppression or persecution or send them in Goulaks in Siberia... America in the day's of Macarthy is not the same as in the Soviet Union.
[edit]Even on criminal code 121 is not REAL this was the thesis about homosexuality in the USSR.Views on LGBT rights and homosexuality in general throughout communist history have ranged from acceptance to apathy to condemnation.While homosexuality has sometimes been labeled by communists as "one of the effects of capitalist sociality"[1][2] and the product of the bourgeoisie,[3][4][5] many communists, especially in recent times, have argued that Gay Liberation is a key issue according to Marxism.[6][7][8] With few exceptions, Communist attitudes towards homosexuality have in recent times evolved largely in correlation with modern westernization in general.[citation needed]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism_and_homosexuality
What are you babble in about my god I will not even bother answering this LIES. You are a tool clearly, as I said I will not post again in this thread but I felt some facts should be corrected about Goebbels new apprentice propaganda.
This is the ONLY good Communist leader who ever existed. He actually did everything that the Bolsheviks intended. He fed the people, his collectivization techniques had his country from being a massive food importer to exporter within a year. He gave his people free healthcare. And most of all he didn't enjoy killing his citizens. That's right it worked once...until he was assassinated four and a half years later.
I'll bet the CIA had something to do with that.
(I just watched Oliver Stone's documentary series on America lol)
Pretty sure the French took him out iirc.
Royal Canadian Artillery was that tree, to be precise.
Well that escalated quickly.You sir are full of bullshit, you are either on a right political party that use this kind of propaganda or an anticommunist...
I don't quite understand what you are trying to prove here. I've read the whole transcript of his speech, I know what it is about, but do you? I don't think so...After being devastated the 80% of the industrial block of production in WW2. Even JFK said about that on the University speech about Peace. After the Cuban missile crisis.
I mean I dislike the Soviet Union but prior astronauts?ITT: People who know little to nothing about russian history but claim otherwise.
Well that escalated quickly.
Your father was lucky he had an active communist in his family, otherwise his situation would've been worse.
Party members and loyalists were always receiving special treatment compared to the rest of the population.
As for Gagarin, everyone knows that the Soviets were the first to get both a satellite and human in orbit, which were pretty admirable accomplishments at that time. But they did not achieve this because of how gloriously advanced science in the USSR was compared to the US, nope, their main advantage was that maintaining even minimal levels of safety was a completely foreign concept to them and they treated humans like expandable and replaceable resources. There are more than a few people including scientists and historians(unfortunately also conspiracy nutjobs) who contend that Gagarin wasn't actually the first man in space, he was just the first one to survive. And that, theoretically, there are some cosmonauts(bodies) still out there hurtling across space. However, the Soviets did have one advantage on their side, mainly their ability to cover up every single failure and destroy all evidence of incompetence, which is why most of the cited evidence to support these theories is generally not regarded as conclusive.
I don't quite understand what you are trying to prove here. I've read the whole transcript of his speech, I know what it is about, but do you? I don't think so...
As for homosexuality in the USSR, Stalin had Article 121.1 added to the entire Soviet Union criminal code in 1933(NOT the constitution of the USSR which you cited), this was the law and remained intact until after the dissolution of the Soviet Union.
http://www.refworld.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/rwmain?docid=3ae6ad788c
Please educate yourself, and most importantly learn to read and to comprehend what you are reading because you are citing sources without actually understanding them. You are citing an wikipedia article proving that communism in modern times has changed its attitude towars homosexuality yet there's no denying there that the USSR under Stalins rule had a generally negative and repressive stance on this issue. "myzhelozhestvo" (a man lying with another man) was punished with up to five years of imprisonment, and psychiatry which made it possible to also forcibly confine lesbian women in a psychiatric clinic. These people were receiving mind-bending drug treatments before being forced to register with a local psychiatrist as mentally ill. Once they were registered, any chance of a professional career or even of getting a driver's license was denied to them.
Please read up on that topic before you label someone as "full of bullshit".
In the 1999 World Legal Survey, a comprehensive overview of legal issues related to homosexuals, the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA), quoting a book entitled Sociolegal Control of Homosexuality, states that:
Until 1993 consensual anal intercourse between adult males was punishable under Article 121.1 of the Russian Federation criminal code by imprisonment of up to five years. Lesbian relationswere not criminalised.
I mean I dislike the Soviet Union but prior astronauts?
They got ahead in the space game because they stole Nazi scientists, like America, and they started researching space shit earlier than America did.
Oh yes, they treated Laika so well and ofcourse the Soviet government initially claimed, she was euthanised prior to oxygen depletion. Except that's not true at all. In 2002 it was revealed that Laika wasn't euthanized, but that she died within hours of the Sputnik 2 launch. The capsule turned out to be something of a rush job because the thermal insulation system broke right away after start. Poor Laika, whose little doggy heart was already beating at four times its resting rate, found herself in a cabin that was 104 degrees Fahrenheit. Her body shut down from stress and heat within five to seven hours of her launch.Hahahahaha, please send Laika my regards because Soviets treated dogs better than humans in their space programmes and next time you visit space please send me a soviet cosmonaut that is in orbit around the planet...
Atleast the US didn't make a secret out of their failures in the space programm. The Soviets on the other hand couldn't accept failures because it hurt the propaganda of their glorious communist state - for example Bondarenko and Nelyubov, first one died in a similar accident like Apollo 1 due to fire in a sealed, high-oxygen environment, second one was a drunk who commited suicide. Their deaths were kept a secret, removed from records and their faces airbrushed out from official pictures.You now because soviets send Apollo 1 like NASA to their graves because they had total disregard about human life and safety for the biggest step the human kind ever did... I do not say here that NASA disregard human life in their space programmes but that shits happen when you explore something for the first time.
How? I allready pointed out how, by totaly neglecting individual human rights, exploiting and stealing resources from satellite countries, etc.Simple really to people with common sense, how is it possible to a war devastated country after 16 years and Stalin's "persecutions" to balance the economy, fix their production line, built schools and universities and create a space programme to send animals and humans into space.
And this relates how exatcly to the crimes commited by the Soviets?As of JFK peace speech it is you who don't understand what he is saying, admitting about the devastations the USSR suffered and respect their position about their interests as U.S.A would protects theirs. It was a competition of systems for superiority and a war that capitalists from all over the world could not afford to lose.
Boy oh boy you're still denying this law existed? Please look up 'The Criminal Code of the USSR' from William Elliott Butler, or if you need everything in a nutshell just take a look into the wiki entry on LGBT history in Russia under Stalins rule.Please take your fedora avatar and lie to someone else, the article about the UNHRC
states
ENLIGHTEN US!ITT: People who know little to nothing about russian history but claim otherwise.
Why should they? The USSR's political ideology didn't exist around racial superiority and the extermination of "lesser" people. The USSR's war crimes are similar to the British, French, or the US and no one expects them to apologize.