There's still no excuse for this not being built into the system.
There's still no excuse for this not being built into the system.
Never!I'd rather have Wifi built in, which it does. Wifi > Ethernet in 2012.
I'd rather have Wifi built in, which it does. Wifi > Ethernet in 2012.
No, Ethernet is still superior to WiFi in 2012. It's faster, more reliable, and not susceptible to interference or drop outs.
Forget that, I want to know what's the excuse for Ethernet being slower than WiFi....
I'd rather have Wifi built in, which it does. Wifi > Ethernet in 2012.
Always go official.
Ran a test on various devices in the house and got:
Wii U: 13.1 Mbps (wi-fi)
Mac: 65.3 Mbps (ethernet)
Mac: 28.5 Mbps (wi-fi)
Big difference. Used www.bandwidthplace.com
Wii U over WiFi
bandwidthplace.com: 7.3 Mbps down
testmy.net: 7.8 Mbps down
Wii U over Ethernet
bandwidthplace.com: 5.1 Mbps down
testmy.net: 3.4 Mbps down
What.
For comparison's sake: Laptop over WiFi
bandwidthplace.com: 10.8 Mbps down
testmy.net: 11.3 Mbps down
So yeah, don't use the ethernet adaptor unless you don't have wifi.
I think it's likely the latter...
That speedtest is nowhere near what I should be getting for both down and up speeds
I'd rather have Wifi built in, which it does. Wifi > Ethernet in 2012.
I think it's likely the latter...
That speedtest is nowhere near what I should be getting for both down and up speeds
Is the Wii U b, g, or n?
Is the Wii U b, g, or n?
Holy crap, they still sell the e-Reader. Their online store really is a blast from the past.
All three.
me tooForget that, I want to know what's the excuse for Ethernet being slower than WiFi....
Any Wii compatible adapter should work on Wii U as well.
Just not a or n 5GHz.
So basically it'll only do b/g. Heh, crazy in this day and age. I could see the Wii only being b/g, but I figured Nintendo would go b/g/n for the Wii U.
No, it'll do n 2.4ghz, just not n 5 ghz.
Didn't know there was an official one
Any USB ethernet adaptor will do... particularly the Wii one
I don't think they're totally accurate, but I think it's kinda telling in comparing the numbers against each other though. For me, I'm getting 1.5 to 2.0mbps for ethernet, 10mbps for WiFi and then 15mbps for my PC. SpeedTest tells me I get 17.5mbps for my PC. I also know I can't get an HD signal through ethernet for Amazon Instant Watch. I think the site is good enough to tell that there's a problem.
Measure your speed vs WiFi. You'll find out it's slower.
I've never had a problem using the wireless for any of my consoles. I'm not sure why people make such a big deal out of it. Perhaps if you'd like to stream videos it might make a difference, I guess, but we stream Netflix in HD perfectly fine on the WiFi of the 360.
The official Nintendo adapter is limiting you to 1.5 to 2.0 mbps?
I wonder if some of the older adapters were USB 1.0, not USB 2.0?
I don't think so. I have an official adapter I got a couple of months after the Wii first released and an official adapter I ordered a couple of weeks before the Wii U released. Both are the same and slower than Wi-Fi.
bandwidthplace.com
Wii U: 6Mbps
PC: 10Mbps
speedtest.net
Wii U: N/A
PC: 25Mbps
Conclusion: Bandwidthplace is a crappy place to test, speedtest.net requires flash so no Wii U support. Better test would likely be to take internet tests out of the equation and host a test on a local computer to run via the Wii U's browser.
A good way to check it isn't browser related would be to download the same game twice, once over Ethernet and once over Wifi.Good to know it's not just me. Seems we're left to wonder if the U's wifi (and ethernet apparently) just sucks or the the browser can't process speedtests.
Best way to test is to download a large file and time how long it takes to download on wifi and ethernet.
That'll give you an idea of consistency over a long period which is what you want for online gaming.
Wii-U browser does not allow downloads, except from the e-shop?
Wii-U browser does not allow downloads, except from the e-shop?
Don't, op. USB is fucking awful for speeds.
Edit: As I now see people have discovered.
USB2 shouldn't bottleneck 100Mbit/s Ethernet considering its effective throughput is 280Mbit/s.Don't, op. USB is fucking awful for speeds.
Edit: As I now see people have discovered.
Reminds me of GameFAQs circa 2003.
Even though you're wrong, the real trick was making you think it's an either/or choice.I'd rather have Wifi built in, which it does. Wifi > Ethernet in 2012.
Conclusion: Bandwidthplace is a crappy place to test, speedtest.net requires flash so no Wii U support. Better test would likely be to take internet tests out of the equation and host a test on a local computer to run via the Wii U's browser.