• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Wii U Ethernet Adapter

Ran a test on various devices in the house and got:

Wii U: 13.1 Mbps (wi-fi)
Mac: 65.3 Mbps (ethernet)
Mac: 28.5 Mbps (wi-fi)

Big difference. Used www.bandwidthplace.com

Wii U over WiFi
bandwidthplace.com: 7.3 Mbps down
testmy.net: 7.8 Mbps down

Wii U over Ethernet
bandwidthplace.com: 5.1 Mbps down
testmy.net: 3.4 Mbps down

What.

For comparison's sake: Laptop over WiFi
bandwidthplace.com: 10.8 Mbps down
testmy.net: 11.3 Mbps down

So yeah, don't use the ethernet adaptor unless you don't have wifi.

Good to know it's not just me. Seems we're left to wonder if the U's wifi (and ethernet apparently) just sucks or the the browser can't process speedtests.
 
I think it's likely the latter...

That speedtest is nowhere near what I should be getting for both down and up speeds

I'd be inclined to agree, but the wildly different Wifi and Ethernet values (on Wii U) nckill noted perhaps suggest the browser's not entirely to blame and something screwy is going on with the general connectivity.
 
I think it's likely the latter...

That speedtest is nowhere near what I should be getting for both down and up speeds

It's noticeable in the Amazon app too. That's what first made me wonder if something was wrong.

Amazon Instant Watch
Ethernet - 2 bars, no HD
WiFi - Full Bars, HD
 
I think someone stated earlier it has to do with the max bandwith of USB. And apperntly, some third party USB adapters are version 1.x instead of 2.x.
 
Any Wii compatible adapter should work on Wii U as well.

The Nyko adapter I purchased not even two months ago for the Wii works just fine on the Wii U.
I don't have a router though. I've never needed one, and would never use WiFi for the PS3 or 360. Simply not worth it. So I'm not going to waste money on one just for the Wii U, when I won't be needing it for fighting games, and any other game that I would need to be online for will have enough speed (even if it's slower, it's still stable) through the USB.
 
Didn't know there was an official one

Any USB ethernet adaptor will do... particularly the Wii one

I think they have to use the same "asix ax88772" chipset the official USB Adapters use.

I have a $16 TRENDnet branded adapter from Amazon that works. I could've got a cheaper no name brand one from China via ebay, but I've heard those can sometimes have MAC addresses with all 0's, so that wouldn't have worked for me.


I get the same speed results on my PC's direct ethernet connection and my Wii U's usb ethernet. Almost identical results. About 3.7Mb for each one.

I'm not sure that site is as accurate as
http://www.speedtest.net/
which gives me about 4.4Mb on my PC, but I can't use speedtest.net on my Wii U

Keep in mind, my DSL line is only 5Mb... So if it's limiting someone's cable at some speed above that... I wouldn't be able to tell you.

I don't think they're totally accurate, but I think it's kinda telling in comparing the numbers against each other though. For me, I'm getting 1.5 to 2.0mbps for ethernet, 10mbps for WiFi and then 15mbps for my PC. SpeedTest tells me I get 17.5mbps for my PC. I also know I can't get an HD signal through ethernet for Amazon Instant Watch. I think the site is good enough to tell that there's a problem.



Measure your speed vs WiFi. You'll find out it's slower.

The official Nintendo adapter is limiting you to 1.5 to 2.0 mbps?

I wonder if some of the older adapters were USB 1.0, not USB 2.0?
 
I've never had a problem using the wireless for any of my consoles. I'm not sure why people make such a big deal out of it. Perhaps if you'd like to stream videos it might make a difference, I guess, but we stream Netflix in HD perfectly fine on the WiFi of the 360.

On a side note, as people are talking about how old that website looks, this is the website for the historical museum in my hometown:

http://www.bountifulutah.gov/HistoricalCommission/A_index01.html

The most notable aspect is that it says it was last updated in April 2012. Yes, folks, somebody updated this site this year, and it still has flashing colorful gifs and a big "Click here" button that also flashes. I'm so proud of my hometown and their historical museum. They're truly performing their duty to preserve relics.

EDIT: Make that THREE identical flashing "Click here" buttons. And if you DO click it, you're treated to more.

EDIT 2: Just clicked through to the staffing and found this gem: "Museum Website (for comments or questions send E-mails to: TomsGrafix@aol.com."
I'll tell you what, I will hire TomsGrafix@aol.com for my next project, particularly if I need it to include parentheses left open.
 
I've never had a problem using the wireless for any of my consoles. I'm not sure why people make such a big deal out of it. Perhaps if you'd like to stream videos it might make a difference, I guess, but we stream Netflix in HD perfectly fine on the WiFi of the 360.

Simply using a microwave will kill your connection.
 
The official Nintendo adapter is limiting you to 1.5 to 2.0 mbps?

I wonder if some of the older adapters were USB 1.0, not USB 2.0?

I don't think so. I have an official adapter I got a couple of months after the Wii first released and an official adapter I ordered a couple of weeks before the Wii U released. Both are the same and slower than Wi-Fi.
 
I don't think so. I have an official adapter I got a couple of months after the Wii first released and an official adapter I ordered a couple of weeks before the Wii U released. Both are the same and slower than Wi-Fi.

This is why I'm considering getting a 3rd party adapter.
 
bandwidthplace.com

Wii U: 6Mbps
PC: 10Mbps

speedtest.net

Wii U: N/A
PC: 25Mbps

Conclusion: Bandwidthplace is a crappy place to test, speedtest.net requires flash so no Wii U support. Better test would likely be to take internet tests out of the equation and host a test on a local computer to run via the Wii U's browser.
 
bandwidthplace.com

Wii U: 6Mbps
PC: 10Mbps

speedtest.net

Wii U: N/A
PC: 25Mbps

Conclusion: Bandwidthplace is a crappy place to test, speedtest.net requires flash so no Wii U support. Better test would likely be to take internet tests out of the equation and host a test on a local computer to run via the Wii U's browser.

It's not crappy if you're comparing relative speeds. There's clearly a difference between Ethernet and WiFi, and Ethernet is clearly slower.
 
Best way to test is to download a large file and time how long it takes to download on wifi and ethernet.

That'll give you an idea of consistency over a long period which is what you want for online gaming.
 
Good to know it's not just me. Seems we're left to wonder if the U's wifi (and ethernet apparently) just sucks or the the browser can't process speedtests.
A good way to check it isn't browser related would be to download the same game twice, once over Ethernet and once over Wifi.

These Ethernet figures look really wrong and smell of USB bullshit.

Edit: beaten.
 
Best way to test is to download a large file and time how long it takes to download on wifi and ethernet.

That'll give you an idea of consistency over a long period which is what you want for online gaming.

Wii-U browser does not allow downloads, except from the e-shop?
 
Hmm. I think it took me about 30-35 mins to download the 1733MB of NSMB U on a Rocketfish USB adapter. Maybe I'll transfer my my game over to my HDD and redownload it on Wifi when I get home.
 
Don't, op. USB is fucking awful for speeds.

Edit: As I now see people have discovered.
USB2 shouldn't bottleneck 100Mbit/s Ethernet considering its effective throughput is 280Mbit/s.
If USB2 intrinsically created bottlenecks to the extents shown ITT, you'd think these PC wifi USB adapters would be known for hampering Wifi speeds. AFAIK they aren't.

It's still very possible the way the console manages USB could be responsible for this though.

Anyway, this is all a bit baffling from a consumer standpoint considering one would want Ethernet for higher and more reliable speeds.
 
I was a little annoyed to discover that it didn't have Ethernet built in (I wired every room in my house for Ethernet) but was planning on picking up the adapter later. After reading this, I don't think I'm going to bother.
 
Does anyone know of a cheap (unofficial) adapter where the retailer ships international? The Amazon link is no good to me.
 
Conclusion: Bandwidthplace is a crappy place to test, speedtest.net requires flash so no Wii U support. Better test would likely be to take internet tests out of the equation and host a test on a local computer to run via the Wii U's browser.

I get near identical results on Bandwidthplace (24.12 mbps down, 3.55 mbps up) and Speedtest.net (25.17 mbps down, 3.75 mbps up). I've tested both sites multiple times, on multiple days, using both the ethernet and Wi-Fi connections on my desktop.


So my Wii U results should be fine with Bandwidthplace, right?

I tested just now and got 12.3/3.28 with Wi-Fi and 6.21/3.02 with ethernet.
 
Top Bottom