It's ironic, considering that one of my favorite "sanity effect" tricks that (ahem) Eternal Darkness pulls on you is when the game suddenly stops after a few hours and you see a message that reads something like "Thank you for playing! Continue your adventure in Eternal Darkness 2, coming soon." Five years later, Too Human does the same thing -- except seriously.
stephentotilo said:I'm sure Kohler meant to say that the game comes out on Aug. 19.
I just posted my preview on the MTV blog, based on 3 hours of play: http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2008/06/30/too-human-preview/
Yeah me neither, so is 10 hours good or bad. How fast was the previewer? I guess play time is pretty relative for such games?
Too Human is not an RPG either, unless you think Diablo is an RPG.
Not sure which one I clicked on, but it was the one where he fights a big mechanical thing.
I was tenative on the game before, but that just removed any doubt. No. Thanks.
Game doesn't even show the boss emerging - some debris gets tossed in from off-screen, then the robot jumps out. And there's no feedback at all when he's attacked - he stands there soaking it up, no movement whatsoever, even for the big special attack. It just looked....dumb. The animation in general has appeared quite poor, but that entire battle was simply terrible. It didn't look like he was fighting a boss, it looked like he was fighting a big monolith that soaks up damage.
WrikaWrek said:This game was delayed like 2 years.
The animations and GUI are exceptionally shitty.AgentOtaku said:
rhino4evr said:I'm pretty sure I'll "try it" the question was will i "buy it"
based on this preview alone, I would asy no, but of course ill wait to hear more before making my final decision.
WrikaWrek said:This game was delayed like 2 years.
Y2Kev said:I may seem hard on this game, but that's only because I'm a total loot whore. Diablo is one of my favorites, and I do want to enjoy this. Still, I have several fundamental issues I will need to sort out out for myself.
Those videos don't look too hot.
just made it even worse for myself by reading that article...I can't wait for Too Human.
It really bothers me how those who are skeptical of the game don't take into account the game as a whole. I'm sure the rough animation will be fixed but none of that really troubled me. Too Human's presentation is just too kick ass that it reminds me of games that are considered classics but aren't exactly remembered for their gameplay but for how well their different aspects were put together.
However, I'm not saying TH won't have great gameplay; on the contrary, I believe the gameplay will be awesome from what I read and heard form the previews, especially with all the RPG elements, classes and customizations implemented.
Anyway, I'm looking forward to upcoming previews and the mentioned cutscene, and congratulations on the site update.
Nolan. said:In Dyack's post that I quited during that time he even denied that it would miss 07.
AgentOtaku said:
Nolan. said:Why are you so sure it's down to ms and not their own mistakes.?
I know Baldur's animation is bad, but I was marveling at the boss itself. I hadn't seen any footage of boss fights, so it surprised me. It was...incomplete.Zenith said:this is how the game has always looked. nothing's changed in the new batch of vids.
WrikaWrek said:It's just incredible. The team isn't small (120 people right?), rumors say the budget isn't small, the game was delayed for a long period of time, it has like 4 years of dev time, and they can't even come out with something that at least looks polished?
I don't understand. There's a word for that, incompetence.
WrikaWrek said:It's just incredible. The team isn't small (120 people right?), rumors say the budget isn't small, the game was delayed for a long period of time, it has like 4 years of dev time, and they can't even come out with something that at least looks polished?
I don't understand. There's a word for that, incompetence.
GhaleonEB said:I know Baldur's animation is bad, but I was marveling at the boss itself. I hadn't seen any footage of boss fights, so it surprised me. It was...incomplete.
Kabuki Waq said:wow ppl buy games that just sound OK now?
standards seem to be lowered this gen.
dejan said:Diablo 3 in it's current early stage looks more polished than this.
Spirit of Jazz said:To be honest the major issue with SK is they can't animate action in scenes or gameplay for shit. It doesn't matter how huge the teams are, whoever's directing the action obviously can't do their job and for some reason hasn't been fired. The one hope I'll have is a lot of that staff were dedicated to modelling equipment and altering the combat instances based on characters stats to make it worthwhile to play until you're 50...
domokunrox said:Standards are not lowered. Only the 360 owners have lowered their standards because nothing else good is going to come out for them Except Fallout 3 (multiplatform) and Gears of War 2.
Kabuki Waq said:I would like to think a Dev wont just give up on their product and rush it out ...and then post on GAF in the hopes of getting some publicity.
sky said:*Squints*
Can the camera be zoomed in?
It's hard to see what's going on... on a SD set this might be a serious problem.
Worm_Buffet said:Even after Dennis tried being a pompous self-important muppet here, people are still against him.
What more can he do?
domokunrox said:Standards are not lowered. Only the 360 owners have lowered their standards because nothing else good is going to come out for them Except Fallout 3 (multiplatform) and Gears of War 2.
10 hours is pretty bad. By the end of the review he made it seem like its going to get reviews between 4.0-8.9 depending on how much dopamine they get injected while they play the game.
All I'm going to say is, that I called this game out for what its going to be months ago. Mediocre.
Worm_Buffet said:Even after Dennis tried being a pompous self-important muppet here, people are still against him.
What more can he do?
Blimblim said:Got the preview build today, but since MS is getting retarded since a few months with the media restrictictions, I'm not going to do any videos.
yoopoo said:Can't see the vids, but is the camera worthy of being patented? Cause Dyack was pimping the camera a lot...so was EGM.
yoopoo said:Can't see the vids, but is the camera worthy of being patented? Cause Dyack was pimping the camera a lot...so was EGM.
We are limited to 4*1 minutes of video. Notice that it is exactly what gamevideos didFrancias Castiglione said:Are you restricted from showing later levels or anything like that?
Is that because of E3, or just a new policy? Because it's really stupid.We are limited to 4*1 minutes of video. Notice that it is exactly what gamevideos did![]()
Blimblim said:We are limited to 4*1 minutes of video. Notice that it is exactly what gamevideos did![]()
mabuza said:silly me for thinking this piece of shit couldnt get any more shittier. well done SK, you've outdone yourselves.
Blimblim said:We are limited to 4*1 minutes of video. Notice that it is exactly what gamevideos did![]()
Bullshitdomokunrox said:Standards are not lowered. Only the 360 owners have lowered their standards because nothing else good is going to come out for them Except Fallout 3 (multiplatform) and Gears of War 2.