Pushing for better instead of settling for the status quo. Its why we've made so much progress these last few decades.Perfect being the enemy of the Good.
The liberal movement personified and this is why we keep taking Ls worldwide.
Pushing for better instead of settling for the status quo. Its why we've made so much progress these last few decades.Perfect being the enemy of the Good.
The liberal movement personified and this is why we keep taking Ls worldwide.
Frankly it doesn't matter what these characters were created to represent, it's what they evolved into representing. And I fail to see how modern Wonder Woman currently represents any of what you have laid out here. If we were to continuously judge a character based on their inception someone like Batman would be a considered a gun toting murderer.
I can't see conservatives anywhere caring about this to any extent. But you're right, it's conjecture on my part.
But it smells to me like classic good intentions gone wrong for greater ideological purity.
Perfect being the enemy of the Good.
The liberal movement personified and this is why we keep taking Ls worldwide.
Pushing for better instead of settling for the status quo. Its why we've made so much progress these last few decades.
Ignorance is a terrible excuse. You shouldn't listen to people who are uneducated in what they're complaining about, that makes zero sense. Opinions aren't valid or logical simply because people have them, and uneducated opinions deserve to be challenged, not rewarded with change.Just because she represents that to you, doesn't mean she represents that for everybody else. How many people who oppose this have actually read the comics? As somebody said, they just see the same image that's been there for decades; a busty coke bottled shaped White woman with an American flag wrapped around as a bathing suit with knee high boots.
Sorry to hear that.
... My mom got me my first comics because she grew up, before Wonder Woman, with Batgil. And Batgirl was pretty awesome.
![]()
Pushing for better instead of settling for the status quo. Its why we've made so much progress these last few decades.
Ignorance is a terrible excuse. You shouldn't listen to people who are uneducated in what they're complaining about, that makes zero sense.
And again, it perpetuates the idea that it's alright to judge based on appearance and not personal character.
I'm not missing them, I'm deeming the ones complaining about her figure invalid because it's obvious that the people claiming what you're saying are saying it from a place of ignorance and are judging a character based on things irrelevant to the conversation. It's like racists who say Obama is a horrible President, and when pushed to give examples why, they have no answer. Because all they're doing is judging him on his looks and have never bothered educating themselves on his actions to improve the country.But that's why I brought up context along with that image of Wonder woman. It all goes together. The problem when you're arguing in a vacuum is you miss all these other issues compounded along with it that created a certain segment to be opposed to it and distill it down to something simplistic and respond to it simplistically.
I'm not missing them, I'm deeming the ones complaining about her figure invalid because it's obvious that the people claiming what you're saying are saying it from a place of ignorance and judging a character based on things irrelevant to the conversation. It's like racists who say Obama is a horrible President, and when pushed to answer why, they have no answer. Because all they're doing is judging him on his looks and have never bothered educating themselves on his actions to improve the country.
People who have no idea who Wonder Woman is outside of how she looks shouldn't even be acknowledged in a debate on if she's a good representative of the UN or not. Because the reasons of why she was picked as an ambassador have zero to do with how she looks.
Imagine if this was a real person, who had done a lot of good for the world, undeniably helped people, and people criticised the pick because she had large breasts and never educated themselves on her accomplishments. Do you think that those are people who deserve to be listened to?
I imagine in both those instances the companies were footing the bills for the events etc. Also a sure fire way to make the news. So why not do this honorary stuff if it has a chance to raise awareness?I don't even understand what the hell an honorary ambassador is and why we need fake people to fill these positions. Just find a real scientist lady or something. This and angry birds makes the UN look ridiculous and these positions completely meaningless in my eyes.
It's not a horrible example. In both situations, despite the fact that they could educate themselves, people are deeming someone unfit for their title based on surface level judgement because they don't care to examine the person on their character or actions. There are people who only expose themselves to Obama at a surface level and hold untrue opinions on him based on how he looks.Man, you made a really awful argument with the Obama example and distilled it down to just ignorance despite the effort I went into about context. People have been exposed to Wonder Woman even at merely a surface level, and there's a certain segment of people who don't think she's a good enough representative to be an honorary ambassador for the UN for all woman. You disagree, apparently the UN agreed with those other people.
It's not a horrible example. In both situations, despite the fact that they could educate themselves, people are deeming someone unfit for their title based on surface level judgement because they don't care to examine the person on their character or actions.
They're remarkably similar situations.
I imagine in both those instances the companies were footing the bills for the events etc. Also a sure fire way to make the news. So why not do this honorary stuff if it has a chance to raise awareness?
It's also not like honorary positions are limited. If they didn't give it to some scientist lady before they wont do it now either.
AND movies. Big ones too.Men get movies and TV shows, women get TV shows.
Right, and it's consistently improved since then. It's better than it has ever been and is still steadily improving.That's because historically female representation in comics (and the comic industry) has been unbelievably bad. The same is true for movies.
Squirrel Girl, Captain Marvel, Ms. Marvel, Hawkeye (female), Thor (female), Gwenpool, Jessica Jones, She-Hulk, Silk, Spider-Gwen, Wolverine (female), Iron Heart, Black Widow, Scarlet Witch, Supergirl, Harley Quinn, Batgirl, Superwoman, Wonder Woman, Mother Panic, Shade, Raven, and Green Lantern (female) all had solo titles released THIS MONTH. That excludes non-solo girl-centric books like Birds of Prey, Uncanny Avengers, and A-Team.The argument was that these characters were getting a big push. They're not. There's no Storm solo movie, she's not front and center of the Marvel universe, I'm not even sure she still has a solo series. How many of the characters you explicitly mentioned have a solo series running anyway?
There is, and I think (fingers crossed) if Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel make bank, we'll see the floodgates open and get a ton more female-driven superhero films.The only characters that come to mind are Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel, who are at least getting solo movies. Maybe Harley Quinn, given how extremely popular and successful the character is. I know the comic book industry is trying to reach out to female audiences, so if you were trying to say that in *general* there was a big push to get women into comics I might agree.
Which has been one of the main points of debate throughout this whole thread and situation.The only similarities is White Supremacy, one being a reaction to a Black man in the highest office; and the other fighting against it as a representation of all women.
Which has been one of the main points of debate throughout this whole thread and situation.
They're also similar because in both situations uneducated people are voicing uneducated opinions and expecting to have their opinion taken seriously.
AND movies. Big ones too.
Squirrel Girl, Captain Marvel, Ms. Marvel, Hawkeye (female), Thor (female), Gwenpool, Jessica Jones, She-Hulk, Silk, Spider-Gwen, Wolverine (female), Iron Heart, Black Widow, Scarlet Witch, Supergirl, Harley Quinn, Batgirl, Superwoman, Wonder Woman, Mother Panic, Shade, Raven, and Green Lantern (female) all had solo titles released THIS MONTH. That excludes non-solo girl-centric books like Birds of Prey, Uncanny Avengers, and A-Team.
There is, and I think (fingers crossed) if Wonder Woman and Captain Marvel make bank, we'll see the floodgates open and get a ton more female-driven superhero films.
If you deem it harmful you're part of the problem, especially in this situation. You're literally putting a female characters looks over her mind and ideals in a situation where she is being praised for her ideals. A woman should be able to dress however she wants and judged solely on her actions. Her image shouldn't even be an issue in the first place. She shouldn't need to have her thoughts and actions "Shield" how she looks because how she looks shouldn't be something that needs shielding because it's not important. That's the definition of sexism. This would not even be an issue if we were talking about a man who has made a career of dressing in a way that entices women.The uneducated part is where I have issue. I guarantee the people who have issue with Wonder Women are more educated than those who hate Obama merely because he's Black. You keep using content of character to shield Wonder Woman and divorcing her image, as if that in and of itself can't represent something people deem harmful.
I still don't see how making him ethnically ambiguous blows his cover has a kid raised on a farm. Are we saying that other ethnic folks can't be raised on a farm?
well this sure is a headline
"UN drops Wonder Woman over her looks"
https://twitter.com/i/moments/808691573944885248
://///
i hate spin. nothing is ever presented fairly.
I don't even understand what the hell an honorary ambassador is and why we need fake people to fill these positions. Just find a real scientist lady or something. This and angry birds makes the UN look ridiculous and these positions completely meaningless in my eyes.
Consider this my official bid for Kamala Khan.
I can't see conservatives anywhere caring about this to any extent. But you're right, it's conjecture on my part.
But it smells to me like classic good intentions gone wrong for greater ideological purity.
Her readership is less than half of the people who protested this. She's not even in the top thousand list.
Now Emma Frost...
If you deem it harmful you're part of the problem, especially in this situation. You're literally putting a female characters looks over her mind and ideals in a situation where she is being praised for her ideals. A woman should be able to dress however she wants and judged solely on her actions. Her image shouldn't even be an issue in the first place. She shouldn't need to have her thoughts and actions "Shield" how she looks because how she looks shouldn't be something that needs shielding. That's the definition of sexism.
Your point about being more educated about WW than Obama also seems pretty baseless. Comics are a niche medium and outside of a movie appearance last year, which showed absolutely none of what she's being praised for, she hasn't had any conduit to the public outside of a few cartoons and a TV show in the 70s.
The island is still in the Bermuda triangle. Doesn't matter if you're free if you live in a tropical place you will get darker the longer you live there from sun exposure. Unless they just stay inside all the time or constantly doing male fantasy shit like rubbing sunscreen on each otherIt's based on Greek mythology. Gal Godot is probably a good representation for that region.
Meh. As I said, I'm torn on this. Representation for women is good. But WW has such a checkered past, questionable patriotic design, and being a white, and scantily clad- I can see how it would be offensive to other women around the world.
Some women firmly believe in the patriarchal model, dislike America for good reasons, are not white/ have had cultures that suffered under white imperialist rule, and believe women should dress modestly. Her modern interpretation is a good progressive role model, despite her origins, but she does not represent all women in the world.
Many simple see her American clade white superheroine that defers to men. Not the Roman/Greek Goddess who is the champion of a matriarchal society that fights for justice and equality.
It says more about truth of human society than it does about Wonder Women. Women on the whole are not seen as equals to men around the world. And it gets worse when you go down the color scale from white to black.
At least men of color can look back to history to see examples where their male ancestors were at the top of the world. Women of any race have no societies they can look back on and be proud of. Sure, there are hiccups in history of a few women rising to the top. But history the world has been controlled and governed by male ideals since the beginning.
Comics and society are making progress- but we are a long ways away from the equality some posters here think exists in the real world. Comics are fantasy.
In the real world, were still arguing about equal pay for equal work while ignoring the old boys system entrenched in businesses around the world. Feminism is a dirt word. We haven't come close to true equality a western society yet and males are pushing back claiming they are victims of prejudice.
Well, I wasn't sure if you were generalizing.We were talking about superhero movies. You keep trying to sugarcoat the situation. Heck, you even bring up animated movies, movies that are not yet released and movies where the solo lead status is debatable, even if I would agree about TFA.
Well, I mentioned Starfire, Raven, Black Canary, Big Barda, Storm, Rogue, Black Cat, Scarlet Witch.I asked about the characters you explicitly mentioned as examples of great original female characters, not about female characters in general. I'm decently aware of comic books, even if I do not purchase too many.
I will say though that I wasn't aware of Mother Panic, Shade, Raven or the Green Lantern one.
Excluding the ones they made that nobody liked.I hope so. I'm very sceptical though and not nearly as optimistic as others. After all it will have taken the industry leader (of comic book movies) 20 movies (and eleven years) to make one with a female solo lead.
![]()
Large breasted white woman with impossible proportions?
Looks can represent something but that doesn't mean that how even a character looks should over shadow their actions. Again, this is a problem exclusive to women when talking about gender. Breast implants and other plastic surgery represent idealized beauty, but that doesn't suddenly mean I should view that womans looks as more important than her throughts and opinions.No I meant more educated in general. LOL
You're crazy if you don't believe Wonder Woman's imagery hasn't been in the mainstream for decades. The majority of people who know who Wonder Woman never read a comic book, yet alone a Wonder Woman comic book.
Wonder Woman is not a real person. She's a fictional character that was specifically drawn that way. Don't for one instance not believe that imagery doesn't represent anything either. Such as idealized beauty, strength, American exceptionalism, the male idea of how woman empowerment should look like, etc...
Lul, it doesn't mention his pants because of course! Why can't Superman outfit be sleeveless shirt and swimming trunks. He's neigh unbeatable he could wear anything because Clark Kent is a square and would also never wear itI'm just saying both Superman and Wonder Woman are essentially invulnerable, only one of them wears short skirts, or previously tight short shorts and tube tops
vs
Looks can represent something but that doesn't mean that how even a character looks should over shadow their actions. Again, this is a problem exclusive to women when talking about gender. Breast implants and other plastic surgery represent idealized beauty, but that doesn't suddenly mean I should view that womans looks as more important than her throughts and opinions.
And yes, her imagry has been in the mainstream for decades, but it's almost always been exclusively that, imagry. Very little of what has made it to the main stream has been anything of substance about her character.
Most people who know who Wonder Woman is probably couldn't tell me very much about her actions or character, but even people who disagree with Obama have at least a cursory knowledge of where he stands on some issues. That knowledge might be skewed in a certain way because of the media but I guarantee that if you went out on the street and ask people to tell you either an Obama policy or a Wonder Woman storyline, you would almost definitely come out with more people knowing where Obama stands on some issues.
First off, I didn't mean to imply that I thought that you had an issue with this. If you thought that I apologize.Man, drop the awful analogy to Obama. I don't think people's issues with Wonder Woman are derived from not reading her comic book. LOL It's bigger than that.
For the record, I like Wonder Woman and can see her as an ambassador for women. I'm also a Black American Man too and have always grown up with that image so it's normalized for me. For other women and people from other countries, perhaps that's not the case and whatever issues they have with Wonder Woman are much more glaringly obvious to them than somebody like me and you.
I was half tired and read it as Luna.What's Moon Girl got to do with FFXV?
First off, I didn't mean to imply that I thought that you had an issue with this. If you thought that I apologize.
As for you other points, I think it is an issue of not reading and understanding her character. Whatever issues they might have could very well come from ignorance of the character and judgement of her based on her appearance. I simply do not think that people who are ignorant to a subject deserve to have their opinion listened to about that subject. People who are ignorant of global warming have some wild ideas about how it doesn't really exist and is a conspiracy or some other such nonsense. Whatever issues they see with the concept of global warming are glaringly obvious to them, but that doesn't mean that their issues are reasonable or logical to people who took the time to educate themselves on the concept.
First off, I didn't mean to imply that I thought that you had an issue with this. If you thought that I apologize.
As for you other points, I think it is an issue of not reading and understanding her character. Whatever issues they might have could very well come from ignorance of the character and judgement of her based on her appearance. I simply do not think that people who are ignorant to a subject deserve to have their opinion listened to about that subject. People who are ignorant of global warming have some wild ideas about how it doesn't really exist and is a conspiracy or some other such nonsense. Whatever issues they see with the concept of global warming are glaringly obvious to them, but that doesn't mean that their issues are reasonable or logical to people who took the time to educate themselves on the concept.
Either that or they do know everything about the character and still put more value (Positively or negatively) on her looks than her actions, which is something else I see as unreasonable and unacceptable.
Sorry, you havent done a very good job at explaining why they're false equivalencies.No need to apologize, I don't think you implied that; I was just setting the record straight with my personal opinion. LOL
You keep making false equivalencies to being uneducated to political issues that unfortunately don't help your argument.
I don't think it's that difficult to understand why some people dislike the imagery of Wonder Woman as an honorary ambassador for women in the United Nations.
I don't mean ignoring them completely. You do your best to try to educate uneducated people. I meant ignore them when it comes time to make a decision.By completely ignoring them, you close a bridge where understanding can happen thereby creating a group of people who can grow with thier ignorance and eventually come to haunt everyone. Closing off a discuss is what breathes extremists
Absolutely, real life women can and should hold roles for female empowerment and equality for the U.N. But the "honorary" embassador role is strictly created for fictional characters. Why can't we have both? Fictional characters have the ability to cross boarders and boundaries that real people can't. They're universally accessible and can be reformed as needed. Wonder Woman was created for female empowerment during WWII but these petitioners are fixating on a 70's or 90's version. 75 years of power and progress and they've reduced her to pretty lady in a bathing suit. Way to strip her of her power and position, just another woman who's lost her job. I created the art for the U.N. with a full understanding of who she is and how much reach she has and what she means to millions of people. The purpose of this initiative was so incredibly positive, with the best of intentions and knowing how perfectly Diana fit into this role. Personally I find it a shame but I'm really disappointed we won't get the full roll out if the plan. Way to suck the potential fun and accessibility out of an important issue.
Sorry, you havent done a very good job at explaining why they're false equivalencies.
Personally i always found weird to pick fictional characters for this sort of thing.
If you deem it harmful you're part of the problem, especially in this situation. You're literally putting a female characters looks over her mind and ideals in a situation where she is being praised for her ideals. A woman should be able to dress however she wants and judged solely on her actions. Her image shouldn't even be an issue in the first place. She shouldn't need to have her thoughts and actions "Shield" how she looks because how she looks shouldn't be something that needs shielding because it's not important. That's the definition of sexism. This would not even be an issue if we were talking about a man who has made a career of dressing in a way that entices women.