• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Worst Blu Ray Transfers

Livingskeletons

If I pulled that off, would you die?
Heat is supposedly a bad Blu Ray transfer, I've never seen it on the format myself.


What are some poor or mediocre Blu Ray Transfers?
 
Disney's The Sword in the Stone is abysmal. I blind-bought it because their animation transfers are usually excellent.
 
Predator

Predator+Blu-ray+Comparison.jpg
 
I remember that hearing that Fifth Element had such a poor BR release, that they had to rerelease it a year later.
The same thing happened with Gladiator. There was a HUGE uproar about it.
 
How bad are we talking about?

http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Sword-in-the-Stone-Blu-ray/44743/

However, having carefully analyzed the film three times on three different displays, then poring over dozens of screenshots, it's become clearer and clearer that the choices made over the course of remastering the film for high definition have only made things worse. Much, much worse. This is, without a doubt, the bottom of the barrel when it comes to the animated presentations Disney has released on Blu-ray.
 
Butch Cassidy is real bad, I'd love to own it, but there isn't a good release.

I think Predator isn't too, bad. I went in expecting horrific, wasn't as bad as I'd been led to believe.
 
Aladdin sequels
Yup Disney crops all of their animated films that were animated in 4:3 it seems, except for the platinum edition ones that people actually give a shit about.

The unfortunate thing about Sword in the Stone is there was actually a really good HD master of that available on iTunes, but when the blu came out they replaced it. Hooray.
 
Canada got screwed over by Alliance for blu-ray transfers, its been a while but if I remember correctly they only had the rights to distribute TV versions of the films so the aspect ratios were off, they were usually only 1080i, generally looked bad and had poor audio. The worst part? There were good transfers of the films being made for the US but they just didn't sell those ones in Canada, I'd assume it was some licencing deal but I do remember them releasing the good US versions later.

The films I remember off the top of my head were Sin City and The Butterfly Effect (which only had the alternate ending on the disc)
 
Heaven & Earth looks terrible.
House of Flying Daggers, too.

A lot of Paramount catalog titles (like Top Gun and The Untouchables) have a DNR that looks kinda bad in screenshots but godawful in motion. It's like they took the grain from one frame of each shot and then had the characters move through it. The grain pattern just ripples and warps around anything that's moving.

And almost every Universal movie from the '90s looks pretty gross, even big titles like the Jurassic Park movies.
 
Why do major studios implement DNR? Why not just keep the grain? It gives me a headache to think about all the people who must be watching DNR'd movies on TVs with DNR post processing enabled.

Those Disney transfers are an absolute travesty.
 
Are people looking at the caps being posted in this thread before they say Star Wars?

There's a magenta push on the Star Wars blus (and a green tint to Fellowship of the Ring) but they're nowhere near as fucked as Tremors, Sword in the Stone, Robin Hood, Predator, etc. etc.

Also, this thread is fucking heartbreaking. Upscaled DVD looks better than some of this shit. Hell, projected LASERDISC would be preferable to whatever they did to Robin Hood.
 
What's up with that Tremors screen cap? Am I seeing DNR and sharpening both pumped to absurdly high levels?
 
Shit, I had heard about what happened with Robin Hood, but I didn't realize it was that bad. I know Disney films from that era was a little rougher in terms of the drawings, but they went way the fuck overboard with trying to "fix" that film.
 
Why do major studios implement DNR? Why not just keep the grain? It gives me a headache to think about all the people who must be watching DNR'd movies on TVs with DNR post processing enabled.

Those Disney transfers are an absolute travesty.

Focus testing. The majority of people associate film grain with bad quality/ugly. Doesn't make them right, just makes them the biggest pile of money.
 
Focus testing. The majority of people associate film grain with bad quality/ugly. Doesn't make them right, just makes them the biggest pile of money.
Is this the official reason? There is a lot about the home video market that is a complete mystery to me.
 
Top Bottom