bean breath said:
Isn't it a major downgrade for a former WWE champion like the Miz to form a tag team and try to get the tag titles? Isn't that basically like him going after the intercontinental title?
not really.
Traditionally it hasn't been all that uncommon for someone to jump from the upper card to the mid card after losing the WWF/E title, or from the mid card to the upper card to challenge for the WWF/E title after a successful IC title reign. You even had two established singles competitors teamng up for the tag division for a while (two very well known teams you might remember are Owen and Yokozuna, or the Power Trip, HHH and Austin).
It's jus tthat for a while now there's been very little mobility between divisions because:
#1: bad booking.
#2: loss of credibiility of most of the titles due to #1.
#3: The need to constantly keep Orton and Cena in the main title picture.
#4: A tendency to have a long series of matches and rematches between the same 2 individuals for the same title in a very poorly booked fashion. This includes the stupid rematch clauses that WWE invokes 100% of the time now as the main impetus for booking decisions. It used to be that if, say, Punk beat Cena for the title, Cena would invoke his rematch clause the next night on raw, and the RAW main event would involve cena losing to Punk cleanly with a run in aftewards ,or through some kind of clever shenanigans by Punk, or someone losing due to interference/countout meaning no title change, allowing them to bury the hatchet on oldfeuds while setting up new ones. Or triple threat matches between Punk Cena and the guy who interfered.
Now, cena loses to punk, cena comes out the next night on RAW, invokes his rematch clause, and cena vs punk 2 gets booked for the next PPV. Cena wins the title back after Punk has a 21 or 28 day reign. PUnk comes out the next night on RAW and invokes HIS rematch clause, and THAT match gets booked for the NEXT PPV, with some kind of stipulation like it's a ladder match or falls count anywhere or something along those lines. Cena wins that match and after 3 or 4 months of feuding between the same two guys ,we end up back where we started, with cena having the title. Punk then gets swapped out for Del Rio or R Truth or Miz or something like that and the cycle continues.
An alternate take on this with the same basic result involves one or more of the PPVs involving a non-clean finish (like a ref screw up or outside interference when the ref is n't looiing) whichis used as justificationn for another rematch (see Christian vs. Orton)
It's bad booking that results in unnatural feuds with no impetus other than contractual clauses and "rules." There's no story. It doesn't build up a feud naturally, and it also draws out the length of existing feuds so very little happens in the product.
Because big organizations like WWE and WCW are always touring and performing on the road, they tend to adopt more mundane, simple styles of in ring action, to reduce the physical wear on their bodies. Consequently, they end up relying on the stories to draw, rather than performances. The time for performances is on PPV events (and the payoff for stories).
When you book things the way I described above, the stories are non-existant.
WWE needs to get away from using "rematch clauses" as the stories behind all of their title feuds. That's why the Nexus storyline remained mostly fresh (until the 2 or 3 months of wade challenging for the title which involved the bad booking I described above), and it's why the MitB and Summerslam title feuds stood out mor ethan anything WWE has done in the last 5 years, because therre were stories behind them, and it was personal (Punk did a great job in making things personal, and Cena did a good job responding and adapting to punk's style, making sure that the personal vendetta stood out and wasn't thrown under the rug. Especially during the contract signing for summerslam. ) They also need to move people around a bit more. Crazy Truth vs Cena was great because it involved someone fresh and helped blend the mid and upper cards a bit, even though WWE didn't follow thorugh with it.
It's that dynamic aspect to the storytelling that makes things great, and it's why the Smackdown Six flourished under paul heyman. And if you can build stories around performances themselves, that helps shoot people to the stratosphere. See Austin vs. Hart, the various Angle vs. Benoit matches, or the best of seven series between Benoit and Booker T.