krypt0nian said:I cannot believe people are still "debating" the HDD.
Its included.....fight about something else.
LIES!
krypt0nian said:I cannot believe people are still "debating" the HDD.
Its included.....fight about something else.
Onix said:How is this plan any better releasing with 2 SKU's from the beginning? At launch, its going to be mostly hardcore gamers that pick up the console. The mainstream audience won't be buying the thing for at least a year or so. If at that point, there is a cheaper version (sans HDD) available - that's the one they'll pick up.
You'll now have a split market, with the non-HDD version likely being the majority sold in a couple of years.
Mrbob said:Would you consider $399 'affordable'?
Because Peter Moore said the Xbox 360 would be affordable while the PS3 will not. Now, if MS thinks 399 is affordable they think the PS3 will be priced at 499. MS can try their scenario, but if Sony comes in with the PS2 at 299 or 349 MS is fucked. In the eyes of the consumers MS just gouged them by dropping 100 bucks in 6 months, hdd or no hdd.
meelk said:Juice is out of his mind.
$299, 20 gig hard drive, there is no doubt.
MS knows this is its ONE big year to sell systems, they will NOT attach a $349-399 price point to this system.
When you are wrong, and VERY wrong juice, we will know who to go directly to and laugh at.
mrklaw said:yeah. They can always take a bigger loss early on (in their 'free' year), and then keep the price at that level for longer, effectively balancing out to the same overall loss over 2-3 years.
impirius said:![]()
It's so simple, you dolts!
$ 300 system (single SKU)
+ 60 game
------------------
$ 360 purchase
:lol Unfortunately the way most retailers work the bundles will be more like this:impirius said:![]()
It's so simple, you dolts!
$ 300 system (single SKU)
+ 60 game
------------------
$ 360 purchase
---- said::lol Unfortunately the way most retailers work the bundles will be more like this:
$300 system
+ $60 game
+ $60 game
+ $60 game
+ $35 controller
-------------------
$515 purchase + tax and/or shipping
I seriously doubt you will find many retailers who are bundling only 1 game at launch.
---- said:When I was trying to buy a PSP back in March there were maybe 2 major retailers who were not bundling. Walmart was.
Walmart still is...
http://www.walmart.com/search/searc..._constraint=0&ics=20&ico=0&ref=+125866.183467
juice said:It's better to start out with one SKU, because that way there will be no possibility of Xbox 360s sitting on the shelf because it's not the one that's in stronger demand. Since there's no way to predict just how popular each SKU would be, it's entirely likely that you'd have leftover inventory after the all-important holiday season. Because hype and branding is even more important than the revenue generated by sales during the launch stage, it's not worth the risk of trying to guess how to apportion two different SKUs. In a worst case, you might have half your inventory sitting on shelves through Christmas unsold (as I said previously), and that would probably permanently stunt the adoption of the 360. While it would also open the door to Sony releasing their console later, it would be because the 360 branding was hurt badly enough that it ceased to be an entirely "hot, hard to find item" before it was a week old.
Onix said:You miss my point. I'm not saying they should have two SKU's at launch ... I'm saying they should NEVER have two SKU's. My point is that even if you did it from the beginning, it wouldn't change much. In either case, it'll suck.
There is a way to predict how popular a SKU would be in your scenario. Unless there is a VERY significant advantage to the HDD version, the mainstream is going to buy the SKU that's cheaper - ie. no HDD. If developers even consider this scenario as a possibility, few will put any sort of major development behind HDD features ... therefore there is no significant advantage to the HDD version ... therefore few buy it ...
A circle is created that prevents any major exploration of what an HDD can do due to poor sales. If Microsoft has any brain, not only will they never bring out an HDD-less 360 ... they will TRUMPET this fact to the press, consumers, and especially developers/producers.
Ruas said:whats a SKU?
Barnimal said:god this is stupid.
ALL OF THE LAUNCH 360s WILL HAVE A HARD DRIVE AND THERE IS ONLY 1 SKU!!!ALL OF THE LAUNCH 360s WILL HAVE A HARD DRIVE AND THERE IS ONLY 1 SKU!!!ALL OF THE LAUNCH 360s WILL HAVE A HARD DRIVE AND THERE IS ONLY 1 SKU!!!
Amir0x said:Jesus Christ, shut the fuck up Barnimal. Why the hell are you still allowed to post? That was the most annoying thing EVER.
Edit: Oh my God, why did you quote the entire thing krypt0nian!? ugh...
Amir0x said:Jesus Christ, shut the fuck up Barnimal. Why the hell are you still allowed to post? That was the most annoying thing EVER.
Edit: Oh my God, why did you quote the entire thing krypt0nian!? ugh...
Barnimal said:FU. go cry somewhere else.
krypt0nian said:Stupid post to counter Juice's obsessive campaign.
It was quoted for truth.
Amir0x said:If you had to encourage Barnimal's ridiculous post, you should have just quoted one little segment of it. Barnimal's fucking idiotic post is officially as bad as anything Juice has posted in this thread now.
krypt0nian said:No worries, Ami! Taken care of.
Barnimal said:stupid post for the stupid people who truly believe there will be a 360 without a hard drive. if you dont like me then put me on your ignore list. its that simple.
If my campaign is so stupid and obsessive, then why can't anyone here do a point-by-point rebuttal? Why hasn't anyone looked at all of the dozen or so reasons I've laid out and addressed more than one of them?
It's because you're all a bunch of fucking sheep who don't think for yourselves or know a goddamned thing about business.
Whether what I said here ends up playing out or not has no bearing on whether it's a better idea than taking such a big hit by launching at $299 with a hard drive. The Xbox 360 is expensive as balls to produce. The CPUs have got to be mindnumbingly price, so does the GPU, and there's a good chunk of RAM in there too, hard drive aside. The original console only had the hard drive and an expensive GPU. It skimped on RAM (64MB was pretty lousy even in 2000), and are you so soon to forget that it runs with a streamlined Celeron?
Something has to give if Microsoft intends to make money.
Barnimal said:ok. sorry bro. i will admit my post was alittle excessive but it just gets annoying reading about this whole thing in a diff thread every day when its already been officially said that every 360 will have a hard drive.![]()
![]()
Barnimal said:ok. sorry bro. i will admit my post was alittle excessive but it just gets annoying reading about this whole thing in a diff thread every day when its already been officially said that every 360 will have a hard drive.![]()
![]()
Amir0x said:I hear you. Everyone has their pet peeves.
And Juice: The reason no one is having a point by point rebuttal is because no matter how "ridiculous" it seems from a business point of view, it has been confirmed and re-confirmed from EVERYONE that the launch XBX360 will have a harddrive and that there will only be one SKU. So what is the point in debating something that was put to death months ago?
Juice said:DO YOU READ?
This thread is not about the Xbox 360 launching sans hard drive! It's about it launching at a price point higher than $299, in order to open up the possibility of (a) offering a hard drive free version and sell with less of a loss and (b) not bleed EVEN MORE than they did on the original console.